Literature DB >> 23433595

Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus: a prospective tandem study.

Maria Giacchino1, Ajay Bansal, Raymond E Kim, Vikas Singh, Sandy B Hall, Mandeep Singh, Amit Rastogi, Brian Moloney, Sachin B Wani, Srinivas Gaddam, Sharad C Mathur, Michael B Wallace, Vijay Kanakadandi, Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian, Neil Gupta, Prateek Sharma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New endoscopic imaging techniques, such as autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI), have been developed to improve the detection of neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus (BE).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of AFI and magnification NBI to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the interobserver agreement.
DESIGN: Prospective tandem study of eligible patients.
SETTING: Single, academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with a history of confirmed BE were prospectively enrolled.
INTERVENTIONS: The BE segment was examined under high-definition white-light endoscopy, and the presence of visible lesions was recorded. Subsequently, AFI and magnification NBI were performed in tandem on areas of the BE segment away from visible lesions; images obtained by these 2 systems were graded according to the color of reflected light and surface patterns, respectively. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the end of the procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AFI and NBI patterns for the detection of HGD/EAC and interobserver agreement.
RESULTS: Of the 42 patients enrolled, 14 (33%) had HGD/EAC. On patient-based analysis, AFI alone had a sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 50%, 61%, and 71%, respectively, and the overall accuracy for the detection of HGD/EAC patients was 57%. By using magnification NBI in tandem fashion, the sensitivity and NPV improved to 71% and 76%, respectively, with a decrease in specificity to 46% and in overall accuracy to 55%. The 2 techniques had moderate interobserver agreement for both the patterns and prediction of histology. LIMITATIONS: Uncontrolled study performed at an academic center by expert endoscopists in a high-risk population.
CONCLUSIONS: By using a multimodality endoscope, both AFI and magnification NBI had limited clinical accuracy and moderate overall interobserver agreement. AFI does not appear to be useful as a broad-based technique for the detection of neoplasia in patients with BE.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433595     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of in vivo vital-dye fluorescence endoscopic imaging for the detection of Barrett's-associated neoplasia.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Michelle H Lee; Alexandros D Polydorides; Daniel G Rosen; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a pilot ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Yutaka Tomizawa; Prasad G Iyer; Louis M Wongkeesong; Navtej S Buttar; Lori S Lutzke; Tsung-Teh Wu; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Recent developments in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Magnus Halland; David Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Swathi Eluri; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Endoscopic modalities for the diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Neel Sharma; Supriya Srivastava; Florian Kern; Wa Xian; Teh Ming; Frank McKeon; Khek Yu Ho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Emerging optical methods for surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Matthew B Sturm; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Recurrent intestinal metaplasia after radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic findings and anatomic location.

Authors:  Cary C Cotton; W Asher Wolf; Sarina Pasricha; Nan Li; Ryan D Madanick; Melissa B Spacek; Kathleen Ferrell; Evan S Dellon; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Improved biopsy accuracy in Barrett's esophagus with a transparent cap.

Authors:  Bai-Li Chen; Xiang-Bin Xing; Jin-Hui Wang; Ting Feng; Li-Shou Xiong; Jin-Ping Wang; Yi Cui
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  In vivo white light and contrast-enhanced vital-dye fluorescence imaging of Barrett's-related neoplasia in a single-endoscopic insertion.

Authors:  Yubo Tang; Jennifer Carns; Alexandros D Polydorides; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 10.  Gastrointestinal diagnosis using non-white light imaging capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Gerard Cummins; Benjamin F Cox; Gastone Ciuti; Thineskrishna Anbarasan; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Sandy Cochran; Robert Steele; John N Plevris; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.