Literature DB >> 24379583

Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a pilot ex-vivo study.

Yutaka Tomizawa1, Prasad G Iyer1, Louis M Wongkeesong1, Navtej S Buttar1, Lori S Lutzke1, Tsung-Teh Wu1, Kenneth K Wang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate a classification of endocytoscopy (ECS) images in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and evaluate its diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
METHODS: ECS was applied to surveillance endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens of BE ex-vivo. The mucosal surface of specimen was stained with 1% methylene blue and surveyed with a catheter-type endocytoscope. We selected still images that were most representative of the endoscopically suspect lesion and matched with the final histopathological diagnosis to accomplish accurate correlation. The diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of the new classification scheme were assessed in a blinded fashion by physicians with expertise in both BE and ECS and inexperienced physicians with no prior exposure to ECS.
RESULTS: Three staff physicians and 22 gastroenterology fellows classified eight randomly assigned unknown still ECS pictures (two images per each classification) into one of four histopathologic categories as follows: (1) BEC1-squamous epithelium; (2) BEC2-BE without dysplasia; (3) BEC3-BE with dysplasia; and (4) BEC4-esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE. Accuracy of diagnosis in staff physicians and clinical fellows were, respectively, 100% and 99.4% for BEC1, 95.8% and 83.0% for BEC2, 91.7% and 83.0% for BEC3, and 95.8% and 98.3% for BEC4. Interobserver agreement of the faculty physicians and fellows in classifying each category were 0.932 and 0.897, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate classification system of ECS in BE. This ex-vivo pilot study demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; Dysplasia; Endocytoscopy; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Interobserver agreement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379583      PMCID: PMC3870511          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang; Richard E Sampliner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies.

Authors:  Erinn Downs-Kelly; Joel E Mendelin; Ana E Bennett; Elias Castilla; Walter H Henricks; Lynn Schoenfield; Marek Skacel; Lisa Yerian; Thomas W Rice; Lisa A Rybicki; Mary P Bronner; John R Goldblum
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Herbert C Wolfsen; Julia E Crook; Murli Krishna; Sami R Achem; Kenneth R Devault; Ernest P Bouras; David S Loeb; Mark E Stark; Timothy A Woodward; Lois L Hemminger; Frances K Cayer; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Ultra high magnification endoscopy: Is seeing really believing?

Authors:  Aman V Arya; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-10-16

5.  Endocytoscopic visualization of squamous cell islands within Barrett's epithelium.

Authors:  Nicholas Eleftheriadis; Haruhiro Inoue; Haruo Ikeda; Manabu Onimaru; Akira Yoshida; Toshihisa Hosoya; Roberta Maselli; Shin-Ei Kudo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16

6.  Endoscopic in vivo evaluation of tissue atypia in the esophagus using a newly designed integrated endocytoscope: a pilot trial.

Authors:  H Inoue; K Sasajima; M Kaga; S Sugaya; Y Sato; Y Wada; M Inui; H Satodate; S-E Kudo; S Kimura; S Hamatani; A Shiokawa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation.

Authors:  E Montgomery; M P Bronner; J R Goldblum; J K Greenson; M M Haber; J Hart; L W Lamps; G Y Lauwers; A J Lazenby; D N Lewin; M E Robert; A Y Toledano; Y Shyr; K Washington
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Magnifying chromoendoscopy of the esophagus: in-vivo pathological diagnosis using an endocytoscopy system.

Authors:  Y Kumagai; K Monma; K Kawada
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  In vivo molecular imaging of Barrett's esophagus with confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Matthew B Sturm; Cyrus Piraka; B Joseph Elmunzer; Richard S Kwon; Bishnu P Joshi; Henry D Appelman; D Kim Turgeon; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Detailed comparison between endocytoscopy and horizontal histology of an esophageal intraepithelial squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Fujishiro; S Kodashima; K Takubo; N Kakushima; M Omata
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.429

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic imaging of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Mariam Naveed; Kerry B Dunbar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-10

Review 2.  Advances in optical gastrointestinal endoscopy: a technical review.

Authors:  Yubo Tang; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 6.603

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.