| Literature DB >> 23433428 |
Marta Moreno1, Sara Bickersmith, Wesley Harlow, Jessica Hildebrandt, Sascha N McKeon, Teresa Fernandes Silva-do-Nascimento, Jose R Loaiza, Freddy Ruiz, Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira, Maria A M Sallum, Eduardo S Bergo, Gary N Fritz, Richard C Wilkerson, Yvonne M Linton, Maria J Dantur Juri, Yadira Rangel, Marinete M Póvoa, Lina A Gutiérrez-Builes, Margarita M Correa, Jan E Conn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The molecular phylogenetic relationships and population structure of the species of the Anopheles triannulatus complex: Anopheles triannulatus s.s., Anopheles halophylus and the putative species Anopheles triannulatus C were investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23433428 PMCID: PMC3606328 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Summary data for collection localities and sample information of the complex
| | | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuto Farm (FY) | 23 | 3 | 1 | 23°63’S/64°46’W | MJD | ||
| | Lake Yuto (LY) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23°38’S/64°27’W | MJD | |
| Guayaramerin (GU) | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10°49’S/65°21’W | JEC | ||
| | Puerto Villaroel (PV) | 10 | 2 | 2 | 16°52’S/64°46’W | JEC | |
| Ceara (CE) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5°05’S/40°23’W | TFS | ||
| | Espirito Santo (ES) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1°15’N/50°54'W | TFS | |
| | Fazenda S. Joao (MT) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 16°57’S/56°36’W | TFS | |
| | Monte Negro (RO) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10°15’S/63°19’W | MAMS/ESB | |
| | Aquidauana (Pantanal do Rio Negro) (AQU) | 6 | 4 | 0 | 19°29’S/55°36’W | MAMS/ESB | |
| | Inubia Paulista (SP) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 21°39’S/50°56’W | MAMS/ESB | |
| | Camacan/Santa Luzia (Bahia) (BA) | 7 | 3 | 0 | 15°25’S/39°32’W | MAMS/ESB | |
| | Coronel Pacheco (Minas Gerais) (MG) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 21°38’S/43°19’W | MAMS/ESB | |
| | Lagoa da Confusao (Tocantins) (TO) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 10°35’S/49°41’W | MAMS/ESB | |
| | Itaituba (ITB) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4°15’S/55°59’W | MAMP/JEC | |
| | Oswaldo Cruz (OC) | 19 | 7 | 3 | 8°00’S/35°00’W | MAMP/JEC | |
| | Salobra (MS) | 20 | 9 | 4 | 20°12’S/56°29’W | TFS | |
| | Silva Jardim (RJ) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 22°39’S/42°23’W | TFS | |
| | Tartarugalzinho (TAR) | 23 | 4 | 1 | 1°30’N/50°54’W | MAMP/JEC | |
| Monitos (MO) | 22 | 6 | 4 | 9°13’N/76°08’W | NN/PA | ||
| | Santa Rosa de Lima (SO) | 27 | 5 | 4 | 10°26’N/75°21 W | NN/JP | |
| | Leticia, km12 (COSW) | 10 | 4 | 3 | 04°6'S/69°57'W | JFR | |
| | Tibu (COL) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 08°38’N/72°44'W | JFR | |
| Juan Montalvo (JM) | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0°50’N/78°51’W | GNF | ||
| Bayano (BAY) | 7 | 1 | 1 | 9°07’N/79°01’W | JRL | ||
| | Gamboa (GAM) | 29 | 4 | 2 | 9°07’N/79°42’W | JRL | |
| | Meteti (MET) | 17 | 2 | 1 | 8°30’N/79°58’W | JRL | |
| Boconoito (BOC) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 8°50’N/69°58’W | JEC/YR | ||
| | Cano Amarillo (CAM) | 15 | 6 | 2 | 8°43’N/71°34’W | JEC/YR | |
| | Casigua Zulia (CAS) | 25 | 4 | 2 | 8°44’N/72°30’W | JEC/YR | |
| | La Veguita (VG) | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8°52’N/70°0’W | JEC/EB | |
| St.Andrew/St.David, Valencia (TRI) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10°39’N/61°09’W | RCW |
Salobra (16) and Fazenda S. João (7), in Brazil, are the type localities for An. halophylus and An. triannulatus C, respectively. N, sample size of each of the genes sequenced; MJD, MJ Dantur; JEC, JE Conn; TFS, T Fernandes-da-Silva; MAMS, MA Mureb-Sallum; ESB, ES Bergo; MAMP: MAM Povoa; NN, N Naranjo; PA, P Aviles; JP, J Pinto; JFR, JF Ruiz; GNF, GN Fritz; JRL, JR Loaiza; YR: Y Rangel; EB: E Brown; RCW, RC Wilkerson.
Figure 1s.l. sampled localities. The locality numbers correspond to those in Table 1. Black dots represent Anopheles triannulatus s.l., black and white triangles represent An. halophylus and An. triannulatus C type localities, respectively. The map depicts the k = 9 groups yielded by SAMOVA software and supported by AMOVA analysis.
Figure 2Tree topology MP, ML and BI of the mitochondrial gene of the complex. Both procedures produced trees of similar topology, with only branch support values above 70% shown. Bayesian posterior probability is above the branch and Maximum Likelihood bootstrapping (percentage) is below the branch. Anopheles albimanus, Anopheles darlingi, Anopheles nuneztovari and Anopheles marajoara were used to root the tree.
Figure 3Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on the of the complex. Black circles represent An. triannulatus C and black triangles An. halophylus. Anopheles albimanus (AALB) and Anopheles darlingi (ADAR) were used to root the tree.
Figure 4Minimum spanning network of the 33 haplotypes of the gene (A) and for the 11 haplotypes of ITS2 (B) from the complex (without intron). The area of each circle is proportional to the frequency of the haplotype. Black squares represent missing or unsampled haplotypes and each segment connecting haplotypes represents one mutation.
Figure 5Bayesian analysis of the concatenated + gene + ITS2 alignment. Support values for common branches are represented above branches estimated using a partition for each gene: GTR + I + G for the COI gene (all positions), GTR + G for the white gene and HKY for the ITS2 model of evolution. The outgroup Anopheles darlingi was used to root the tree.
Description of shared haplotypes for the complex
| Yuto Farm (FY) | 23 | E | |||
| | Lake Yuto (LY) | 3 | E | ||
| Guayaramerin (GU) | 4 | E32(4) | E | ||
| | Puerto Villaroel (PV) | 10 | E3,E5,E6,E12(2),E13,E49,E62,E63(2) | E | |
| Ceara (CE) | 2 | D21,D22 | D | ||
| | Espirito Santo (ES) | 1 | E | ||
| | Fazenda S. Joao (MT) | 2 | E61, | E | |
| | Monte Negro (RO) | 5 | E22, E23, | E | |
| | Aquidauana (Pantanal do Rio Negro) (AQU) | 6 | D23,E17,E18,E19,E20,E21 | D,E | |
| | Inubia Paulista (SP) | 6 | E | ||
| | Camacan/Santa Luzia (Bahia) (BA) | 7 | G3,G4,G5,G6,G7,G8,G9 | G | |
| | Coronel Pacheco (Minas Gerais) (MG) | 6 | G10,G11,G12,G13,G14,E31 | G,E | |
| | Lagoa da Confusao (Tocantins) (TO) | 6 | E24, E25, E26, E27, | E | |
| | Itaituba (ITB) | 5 | E16, | E | |
| | Oswaldo Cruz (OC) | 19 | C,D | ||
| | Salobra (MS) | 20 | E | ||
| | Silva Jardim (RJ) | 2 | G1,G2 | G | |
| | Tartarugalzinho (TAR) | 23 | D2,D3,D4,D9,D10(4),D11, | D, E | |
| Monitos (MO) | 23 | B,F | |||
| | Santa Rosa de Lima (SO) | 27 | B18, | B,F | |
| | Leticia, km12 (COSW) | 10 | E36,E37(4),E38,E39,E40,E41,E42 | E | |
| | Tibu (COL) | 3 | B,C | ||
| Juan Montalvo (JM) | 6 | E33(4), E34, E35 | E | ||
| Bayano (BAY) | 7 | A | |||
| | Gamboa (GAM) | 29 | A1,A2, | A | |
| | Meteti (MET) | 17 | A | ||
| Boconoito (BOC) | 6 | B1, | B | ||
| | Cano Amarillo (CAM) | 15 | B | ||
| | Casigua Zulia (CAS) | 25 | D,C | ||
| | La Veguita (VG) | 6 | B6, | B | |
| St.Andrew/St.David, Valencia (TRI) | 2 | B |
The number in parentheses indicates the frequency of the haplotype at that site; bold numbers are shared haplotypes, plain numbers are unique haplotypes in that population and underlined numbers are An. halophylus (E8, E53) and An. triannulatus C (E7, E9).
Figure 6Haplotype network derived from 175 haplotypes from 689 bp of the gene sequences from 326 specimens of the complex. A) Geographic distribution of the COI lineages; B) Haplotypes are represented by circles and their frequency is proportional to the area. Numbers represent mutational steps between haplotypes and grey dots are median vectors. The An. darlingi and An. nuneztovari outgroup sequences (black dots) joined the network at the Colombian haplotypes and they are septed from all the Anopheles triannulatus complex individuals by more than 50 fixed differences.
Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) using in the complex
| 53.81 | 3.24 | 42.95 | |
| ΦCT =0.53*** | ΦST =0.57*** | ΦSC =0.07*** | |
| 53.13 | 3.90 | 42.96 | |
| ΦCT =0.531*** | ΦST =0.57*** | ΦSC =0.08*** | |
| 47.11 | 10.45 | 42.44 | |
| ΦCT =0.47*** | ΦST =0.57*** | ΦSC =0.19*** | |
| 37.49 | 19.18 | 43.33 | |
| ΦCT =0.37*** | ΦST =0.56*** | ΦSC =0.3*** |
1) Groups (localities number) derived from SAMOVA k = 9; 2), 3) and 4) with modifications in the groups based on SAMOVA results. ***p<0.001.
Molecular diversity and neutrality test in the main mt-DNA lineages within the complex
| A | 53 | 18 | 0.00275 | 0.841 (0.035) | 1.894 | −11.706*** | −3.223** | −3.205* | −1.802* | 0.162*** |
| B | 33 | 19 | 0.00776 | 0.960 (0.018) | 5.348 | −8.354** | −1.492 | −1.29 | −1.21 | 0.160*** |
| C | 26 | 11 | 0.00457 | 0.806 (0.071) | 3.148 | −2.558 | 0.106 | −0.0009 | 0.305 | 0.126*** |
| D | 43 | 23 | 0.00628 | 0.921 (0.030) | 4.328 | −11.479*** | −1.373 | −0.981 | −1.483 | 0.109*** |
| E | 109 | 70 | 0.0194 | 0.989 (0.003) | 13.383 | −41.832*** | −1.972 | −1.999 | −1.173 | 0.090*** |
| F | 48 | 20 | 0.00760 | 0.906 (0.029) | 5.238 | −6.361* | −2.775* | −2.748* | −1.575 | 0.109*** |
| G | 14 | 14 | 0.00636 | 1 (0.027) | 4.385 | −11.622*** | −1.588 | −1.429 | −1.265 | 0.151*** |
| 326 | 175 | 0.0242 | 0.989 (0.0017) | 16.676 | −158.48*** | −1.924 | −2.334* | −0.914 | 0.075*** |
A: Panama; B: cis-Andean Venezuela + Colombia + Trinidad-Tobago; C: Venezuela; D: NE and C Brazil + Venezuela; E: Ecuador, Colombia, Bolivia, Argentina, Brazil; F: Colombia; G: SE Brazil; N: sample size; h: number of haplotypes; π: nucleotide diversity; Hd: Haplotype diversity (SD: Standard deviation); k: average number of pairwise differences; F: Fu’s F statistic; F*: Fu and Li F test; D*:
Fu and Li’s D test; D: Tajima’s D; R: Ramos-Onsins & Rozas R test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.02; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7Observed and simulated mismatch frequency distributions under population expansion model for each major mtDNA lineages of the complex. Curves represent the frequency distribution of pairwise differences and p-values represent the probability that the variance of the simulated data set is equal to or greater than the observed data set.