Literature DB >> 23432660

Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C virus-infected patients using ethoxybenzyl-magnetic resonance imaging.

Shunsuke Nojiri1, Atsunori Kusakabe, Kei Fujiwara, Noboru Shinkai, Kentaro Matsuura, Etsuko Iio, Tomokatsu Miyaki, Takashi Joh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver biopsy is the gold standard test to determine the grade of fibrosis, but there are associated problems. Because gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid is secreted partially in hepatocytes and bile, it is possible that ethoxybenzyl-magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) correlates with liver function and liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to compare the fibrosis seen in liver biopsy samples to the signal intensity of the hepatobiliary phase measured on EOB-MRI in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients.
METHODS: Two hundred twenty-four (estimation 149, validation 75) HCV-infected patients with histologically proven liver tissue who underwent EOB-MRI were studied. Overall, fibrosis staging was 15/24/19/46/45 for F0/F1/F2/F3/F4, respectively. A 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance system was used, and the regions of interest of the liver were measured. Four methods were used: (i) relative enhancement: (post-enhanced signal intensity [SI] - pre-enhanced intensity)/pre-enhanced intensity; (ii) liver-to-intervertebral disk ratio (LI): post-enhanced (liver SI/interdisc SI)/pre-enhanced (liver SI/inter disc SI); (iii) liver-to-muscle ratio: post-enhanced (liver SI/muscle SI)/pre-enhanced (liver SI/muscle SI); and (iv) liver-to-spleen ratio: post-enhanced (liver SI/spleen SI)/pre-enhanced (liver SI/spleen SI).
RESULTS: To discriminate F0-1 versus F2-4 or F0-2 versus F3-4 or F0-3 versus F4, LI at 25 min (LI25) had the highest area under receiver operating characteristic (0.88, 0.87, and 0.87, respectively) in these four methods and also in the validation set.
CONCLUSION: LI at 25 min seems to be a useful method to determine the staging of fibrosis as a non-invasive method in HCV-infected hepatitis or cirrhosis patients.
© 2013 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23432660     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of the prognostic value of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus treated with triple or dual antiviral therapy: A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Cristina Stasi; Alessia Piluso; Umberto Arena; Elena Salomoni; Paolo Montalto; Monica Monti; Barbara Boldrini; Giampaolo Corti; Fabio Marra; Giacomo Laffi; Stefano Milani; Anna Linda Zignego
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis C by EOB-MRI.

Authors:  Shunsuke Nojiri; Kei Fujiwara; Noboru Shinkai; Mio Endo; Takashi Joh
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-27

Review 3.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: focus on liver scintigraphy.

Authors:  Cristiane Valle Tovo; Angelo Zambam de Mattos; Gabriela Perdomo Coral; Fernanda Schild Branco; Eiji Suwa; Angelo Alves de Mattos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Noninvasive diagnosis of cirrhosis: a review of different imaging modalities.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Mirko D'Onofrio; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Crosara; Stefano Canestrini; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Hyperintensity at fat spared area in steatotic liver on the hepatobiliary phase MRI.

Authors:  Emre Ünal; İlkay Sedakat İdilman; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Deniz Akata; Muşturay Karcaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Assessment of clinical signs of liver cirrhosis using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3T MRI.

Authors:  Michael Haimerl; Niklas Verloh; Florian Zeman; Claudia Fellner; René Müller-Wille; Andreas G Schreyer; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Histogram analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for quantitative hepatic fibrosis measurement.

Authors:  Honsoul Kim; Seong Ho Park; Eun Kyung Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Young Nyun Park; Hae-Jeong Park; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MRI-based assessment of liver perfusion and hepatocyte injury in the murine model of acute hepatitis.

Authors:  Katarzyna Byk; Krzysztof Jasinski; Zaneta Bartel; Agnieszka Jasztal; Barbara Sitek; Boguslaw Tomanek; Stefan Chlopicki; Tomasz Skorka
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  MR Prediction of Liver Function and Pathology Using Gd-EOB-DTPA: Effect of Liver Volume Consideration.

Authors:  Dai Shimamoto; Akihiro Nishie; Yoshiki Asayama; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Yukihisa Takayama; Nobuhiro Fujita; Ken Shirabe; Tomoyuki Hida; Yuichiro Kubo; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging.

Authors:  Yee Liang Thian; Angela M Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.