| Literature DB >> 23431242 |
Cláudio A Cunha1, Fábio S Lira, José C Rosa Neto, Gustavo D Pimentel, Gabriel I H Souza, Camila Morais Gonçalves da Silva, Cláudio T de Souza, Eliane B Ribeiro, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Cláudia M Oller do Nascimento, Bruno Rodrigues, Patrícia de Oliveira Carvalho, Lila M Oyama.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of green tea Camellia sinensis extract on proinflammatory molecules and lipolytic protein levels in adipose tissue of diet-induced obese mice. Animals were randomized into four groups: CW (chow diet and water); CG (chow diet and water + green tea extract); HW (high-fat diet and water); HG (high-fat diet and water + green tea extract). The mice were fed ad libitum with chow or high-fat diet and concomitantly supplemented (oral gavage) with 400 mg/kg body weight/day of green tea extract (CG and HG, resp.). The treatments were performed for eight weeks. UPLC showed that in 10 mg/mL green tea extract, there were 15 μg/mg epigallocatechin, 95 μg/mg epigallocatechin gallate, 20.8 μg/mg epicatechin gallate, and 4.9 μg/mg gallocatechin gallate. Green tea administered concomitantly with a high-fat diet increased HSL, ABHD5, and perilipin in mesenteric adipose tissue, and this was associated with reduced body weight and adipose tissue gain. Further, we observed that green tea supplementation reduced inflammatory cytokine TNFα levels, as well as TLR4, MYD88, and TRAF6 proinflammatory signalling. Our results show that green tea increases the lipolytic pathway and reduces adipose tissue, and this may explain the attenuation of low-grade inflammation in obese mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23431242 PMCID: PMC3569937 DOI: 10.1155/2013/635470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Composition of standard chow and high-fat diet.
| Ingredients | Standard chow | High-fat diet | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/kg−1 | Kcal/kg−1 | g/kg−1 | Kcal/kg−1 | |
| Cornstarch (Q.S.P.) | 398 | 1590 | 116 | 462 |
| Casein | 200 | 800 | 200 | 800 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 400 | 100 | 400 |
| Dextrinated starch | 132 | 528 | 132 | 528 |
| Lard | — | — | 312 | 2808 |
| Soybean oil | 70 | 630 | 40 | 360 |
| Cellulose | 50 | — | 50 | — |
| Mineral mix | 35 | — | 35 | — |
| Vitamin mix | 10 | — | 10 | — |
| L-Cysteine | 3 | — | 3 | — |
| Choline | 2.5 | — | 2.5 | — |
|
| ||||
| Total | 1000 | 3948 | 1000 | 5358 |
Body weight and absolute and relative tissue weight.
| Parameters | CW | CG | HW | HG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial weight (g) | 27.9 ± 0.9 | 27.7 ± 1.2 | 28.3 ± 1.5 | 25.9 ± 0.6 |
| Final weight (g) | 45.4 ± 3.2 | 33.5 ± 1.5* | 40.8 ± 1.3 | 33.9 ± 1.4# |
| Delta weight (g) | 17.5 ± 1.3 | 5.8 ± 1.1* | 12.5 ± 0.9 | 8.0 ± 0.7# |
| Epididymal (g) | 0.81 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | 1.45 ± 0.43$ | 0.52 ± 0.08# |
| Epididymal (%) | 1.78 ± 0.16 | 1.85 ± 0.17 | 2.89 ± 1.12 | 1.41 ± 0.19# |
| Retroperitoneal (g) | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.03* | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 0.39 ± 0.08 |
| Retroperitoneal (%) | 1.05 ± 0.21 | 0.57 ± 0.11* | 1.35 ± 0.20 | 1.14 ± 0.22 |
| Mesenteric (g) | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.28$ | 0.23 ± 0.04# |
| Mesenteric (%) | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 1.05 ± 0.23 | 2.16 ± 0.72$ | 0.65 ± 0.11# |
| Liver (g) | 1.77 ± 0.09 | 1.55 ± 0.05 | 1.79 ± 0.18 | 1.37 ± 0.06 |
| Liver (%) | 3.99 ± 0.33 | 4.73 ± 0.30 | 4.42 ± 0.49 | 4.05 ± 0.17 |
| Gastrocnemius (g) | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
| Gastrocnemius (%) | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.05 |
*P < 0.05 chow diet and green tea (CG) group versus chow diet and water (CW) group (n = 12). $ P < 0.05 high-fat diet and water (HW) group versus CW group (n = 12). # P < 0.05 high-fat diet and green tea (HW) group versus HW group (n = 12). g: grams; %: percentage.
Serum concentrations of triacylglycerol (TAG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), free fatty acids (FFA), and adiponectin in different experimental groups.
| Parameters | CW | CG | HW | HG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAG (mmol/L) | 1.58 ± 0.04 | 1.57 ± 0.03 | 1.60 ± 0.04 | 1.46 ± 0.05 |
| CT (mmol/L) | 3.12 ± 0.08 | 3.29 ± 0.13 | 3.58 ± 0.17 | 3.54 ± 0.06 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.54 ± 0.10 | 1.85 ± 0.16 | 1.81 ± 0.10 | 2.31 ± 0.13# |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | 1.11 ± 0.09$ | 0.87 ± 0.08 |
| FFA ( | 1.21 ± 0.08 | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 1.02 ± 0.11 | 1.16 ± 0.13 |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) | 82.25 ± 1.76 | 106.49 ± 2.91* | 85.82 ± 2.53 | 112.02 ± 7.64# |
*P < 0.05 chow diet and green tea (CG) group versus chow diet and water (CW) group (n = 12). $ P < 0.05 high-fat diet and water (HW) group versus CW group (n = 12). # P < 0.05 high-fat diet and green tea (HW) group versus HW group (n = 12).
Content cytokines in mesenteric adipose tissue.
| Adipokines | CW | CG | HW | HG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adiponectin (pg/ | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.37 ± 0.02* | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.04# |
| IL-10 (pg/ | 1.91 ± 0.26 | 11.27 ± 1.33* | 3.47 ± 0.50 | 5.34 ± 0.47 |
| TNF- | 2.09 ± 0.79 | 1.92 ± 0.61 | 5.80 ± 0.47$ | 2.62 ± 0.61# |
*P < 0.05 chow diet and green tea (CG) group versus chow diet and water (CW) group (n = 12). $ P < 0.05 high-fat diet and water (HW) group versus CW group (n = 12). # P < 0.05 high-fat diet and green tea (HW) group versus HW group (n = 12).
Figure 1Protein levels of HSL, ATGL, ABHD5, and perilipin A. Mesenteric adipose tissue extracts were immunoblotted with anti-HSL (a), anti-ATGL (b), anti-ABHD5 (c), and Peri A (d). The results of scanning densitometry are expressed as arbitrary units. Bars represent means ± SEM of n = 6 mice, *P < 0.05 chow and green tea (CG) group versus chow and water (CW) group, $ P < 0.05 high-fat and water (HW) group versus CW group, and # P < 0.05 high-fat and green tea (HG) group versus HW group. In (e), the representative bands of the molecules are shown. The membrane was stripped and immunoblotted with anti-α-tubulin antibody and used as loaded protein (lower panel in (e)).
Figure 2Protein levels of TLR4, MyD88, and TRAF6. Mesenteric adipose tissue extracts were immunoblotted with anti-TLR4 (a), anti-MyD88 (b), and anti-TRAF6 (c). The results of scanning densitometry are expressed as arbitrary units. Bars represent means ± SEM of n = 6 mice, # P < 0.05 when compared to the high-fat diet and green tea (HG) group versus high-fat diet and water (HW) group. In (d), the representative bands of the molecules are shown. The membrane was stripped and immunoblotted with anti-α-tubulin antibody and used as loaded protein (lower panel in (d)).