| Literature DB >> 23430520 |
Gabor E Linthorst1, Alessandro P Burlina, Franco Cecchi, Timothy M Cox, Janice M Fletcher, Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen, Roberto Giugliani, Carla E M Hollak, Gunnar Houge, Derralynn Hughes, Iikka Kantola, Robin Lachmann, Monica Lopez, Alberto Ortiz, Rossella Parini, Alberto Rivera, Arndt Rolfs, Uma Ramaswami, Einar Svarstad, Camilla Tondel, Anna Tylki-Szymanska, Bojan Vujkovac, Steven Waldek, Michael West, F Weidemann, Atul Mehta.
Abstract
The interruption of the manufacturing process of agalsidase beta has led to a worldwide shortage of this drug. In the EU, nearly all patients initially reduced their agalsidase beta dose, and many of these switched to agalsidase alfa (Replagal Shire HGT). The clinical consequences of this period of drug shortage need to be further evaluated. A gradual increase of agalsidase beta supply is now expected. This implies that patients could resume or even commence agalsidase beta treatment. Guidance for prioritization of patients is needed to support equitable distribution of agalsidase beta to EU member states. To achieve this, in absence of level I clinical evidence, a draft consensus proposal was initiated and distributed. No full consensus was achieved, as there is disagreement regarding the indications for switching patients from agalsidase alfa to agalsidase beta. Some physicians support the concept that the 1.0 mg/kg EOW dose of agalsidase beta is more effective than agalsidase alfa at 0.2 mg/kg EOW, while others believe that at recommended dose, the preparations are equivalent. In light of these difficulties and the uncertainties with respect to supply of agalsidase beta, recommendations were agreed upon by a subgroup of physicians. These current recommendations focus on prioritization of criteria indicative of disease progression.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23430520 PMCID: PMC3565660 DOI: 10.1007/8904_2012_160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JIMD Rep ISSN: 2192-8304