Literature DB >> 23428586

Expression and potential role of GATA factors in trophoblast development.

Hanako Bai1, Toshihiro Sakurai, James D Godkin, Kazuhiko Imakawa.   

Abstract

Despite exhaustive studies, molecular mechanisms governing blastocyst formation, implantation to the uterine endometrium and placentation have not been definitively characterized. GATA family proteins are a group of zinc finger transcription factors, for which gene ablations eventually result in embryonic death later in pregnancy. These findings suggested that GATA factors are not essential for early embryonic development. However, recent studies from our laboratory and others have revealed that GATA proteins are involved in the regulation of key genes expressed by the trophectoderm that underpin the transition from the morula to trophoblast, and trophectoderm maintenance. Consequently, it is important to consider the current understanding how GATA factors govern early trophectoderm development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23428586      PMCID: PMC3943230          DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2012-100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Dev        ISSN: 0916-8818            Impact factor:   2.214


In most mammals, conceptus implantation to the uterine endometrium consists of blastocyst hatching, migration, apposition/attachment, invasion, and subsequent placental formation. It is known that close to 50% of fertilized preimplantation embryos in mammals, including humans, fail to implant [1]. Although numerous transcription factors and their downstream genes involved in trophoblast development have been identified [2, 3], the regulation of trophectoderm (TE)-specific gene expression has not been definitively characterized. A lack of our knowledge on implantation mechanisms and TE-specific gene regulation may have limited the improvements in pregnancy success. GATA transcription factors are so named for their highly conserved zinc finger domains that bind to the consensus DNA sequence W(A/T)GATAR(A/G) (GATA motif), resulting in transcriptional regulation of downstream genes [4, 5]. They have been found throughout the eukaryote spectrum, including fungi and plants as well as invertebrates and vertebrates [6]. In vertebrates, including mammals, six GATA factors (GATA1 through GATA6) have been identified, and based on sequence homology and tissue distribution, these GATA factors have been divided into two subfamilies. In mice, the mRNA and proteins of all six GATA factors were detected during the embryonic development process (Table 1). GATA1, GATA2 and GATA3 regulate development and differentiation of hematopoietic lineages [7,8,9], while GATA4, GATA5 and GATA6 are involved in cardiac development and endodermal derivatives [10,11,12]. In Gata gene ablation studies, with the exception of Gata5, lack of each Gata gene resulted in mid-gestation lethality [7,8,9,10,11,12] (Table 2). For these reasons, GATA factors had been considered not important for early embryonic and/or trophoblast development.
Table 1.

GATA Transcription factor mRNA and protein expression in mice

GATA factorsRNA expression detectedMethodsutilizedReferencesProtein expression detectedMethodsutilizedReferences
GATA1E1.5 (2-cell)R[53]E6.75Im[56]
GATA2E1.5 (2-cell)R[54]E10.5Im[57]
GATA3E2.0 (4-cell)R[13]E3.5 (blastocyst)Im[13]
GATA4E1.5 (2-cell)R[53]E4.0Im[58]
GATA5E7.0ISH[55]E9.5Im[59]
GATA6E1.5 (2-cell)R[54]E4.0Im[58]

Methods: Im, immunohistochemical staining; ISH, in situ hybridization; R, RT-PCR.

Table 2.

Embryonic lethality of Gata gene knockout mice

GATA factorsLethality of knockout mouseCauseReferences
Gata1E10.5 – E11.5Embryonic erythropoiesis arrest[7]
E12.5 (Hematopoietic promoter-specific disruption)95% reduction of Gata1 mRNA maturation arrest in proerythropoiesis[60]
Gata2E10.5Failure to develop all hematopoietic lineages (severe anemia)[8]
Gata3E11.0 – 12.0Massive internal bleeding, marked growth retardation, severe deformities of the brain and spinal cord, and gross aberrations in fetal liver hematopoiesis[9]
E12.0Failure to give rise to thymocytes or mature peripheral T cells[61]
Gata4E7.0 – E9.5Lack primitive heart tube and foregut, developed partially outside the yolk sac[10]
E8.5 – E10.5Defect in rostral-to-caudal and lateral-to-ventral folding[62]
Gata5No embryonic lethalityAbnormalities of genitourinary tract (female)[11]
Gata6E6.5 – E7.5Defects in visceral endoderm function and extraembryonic development[12]
Gata4+/–Gata6+/–E13.5Abnormal vascular development[63]
Gata4+/–Gata5–/–E14.5Cardiovascular defects[64]
Methods: Im, immunohistochemical staining; ISH, in situ hybridization; R, RT-PCR. Over the past three years, GATA3 was found to assist TE differentiation in mice [13, 14], while our laboratory was discovering that GATA2 and GATA3 regulate interferon tau (IFNT) and other TE-specific gene transcriptions in ruminants [15, 16]. Because of these findings, we believe that GATA factors play roles, yet unidentified, in peri-implantation development, including both species-specific functions and those universal across vertebrate species. This review details the currently ascribed functions of the GATA factors during the peri-implantation period with emphasis on the hematopoietic group of GATA1, GATA2, and GATA3 in TE development and TE-specific gene expressions.

Trophoblast Lineage Development

The trophoblast lineage, derived from the extraembryonic trophectoderm, is the first differentiated cells arising from the pre-implantation embryos in mammals [17]. Trophoblast development and differentiation in the mouse have been well studied. The blastocyst hatches from the zona pellucida at 3.5 day post coitum (dpc) in mice [18], and trophectodermal cells that line the blastocoel cavity (mural trophectoderm) differentiate into trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) coincident with the implantation process around 5–6 dpc. Among numerous factors well studied in mice, a caudal-type homeodomain transcription factor Cdx2, expressed from 4-cell stage embryos predominantly in the outer blastomeres, has been characterized as the factor involved in the decision of TE cell lineage [13, 14, 19,20,21]. Recently, GATA3 was found to be capable of inducing trophoblast fate in embryonic stem cells and driving trophoblast differentiation in trophoblast stem cells (TS) [14]. In addition to these observations, we also confirmed that all six GATA mRNAs exist in bovine and/or ovine conceptuses during the peri-implantation periods [15, 22 and unpublished observations]. The presence of six GATA mRNAs in the bovine and/or ovine conceptuses suggests that these factors may play roles other than those already known for erythropoiesis and heart formation.

GATA-regulated Cellular Events

The GATA factor is associated with differentiation processes in various cells and tissues. GATA1 is critical for terminal maturation of erythroid and megakaryotic cells [23, 24], the early stage of eosinophil differentiation [25], and the late stage of mast cell differentiation [26]. GATA2 is expressed in undifferentiated hematopoietic cells and is involved in the maintenance of these cells at the undifferentiated state, while GATA3 is involved in the differentiation of Th2 cells from immature T cells [27]. The demise of transgenic mice seems to be unrelated to apparent defects in early TE development (Fig. 1, Table 2). However, since GATA factors have both distinct and overlapping expression and biological functions [7, 8, 28,29,30,31], it is possible that redundant expression and functions of other GATA factors might compensate for those inactivated in knockout mice.
Fig. 1.

Embryonic and extraembryonic development, and GATA transcription factor expression in mice. Early development of the mouse embryo from 0.5 dpc to 10.5 dpc is shown. Upper: Mouse conceptus developments. Following the first lineage decision to trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM), the ICM differentiates into the primitive ectoderm, which gives rise to the embryo proper and the yolk sac. After implantation, the trophoblast differentiates into subtypes consisting of trophoblast giant cells, chorionic ectoderm, and ectoplacental cone. The yolk sac membranes consist of the parietal yolk sac (trophoblast giant cells and parietal endoderm) and the visceral yolk sac (visceral endoderm and extraembryonic mesoderm). The allantoic mesoderm forms the endothelial cell lining of fetal blood vessels in the labyrinth zone. Distinct regions of the placenta include the labyrinth, the spongiotrophoblast and a discontinuous layer of trophoblast giant cells. Lower: GATA transcription factor expression in mice. Expression of GATA transcription factors in mice is shown. Days on the right indicate days post coitus (dpc) when embryonic death occurs in mutant mice for various Gata genes.

Embryonic and extraembryonic development, and GATA transcription factor expression in mice. Early development of the mouse embryo from 0.5 dpc to 10.5 dpc is shown. Upper: Mouse conceptus developments. Following the first lineage decision to trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM), the ICM differentiates into the primitive ectoderm, which gives rise to the embryo proper and the yolk sac. After implantation, the trophoblast differentiates into subtypes consisting of trophoblast giant cells, chorionic ectoderm, and ectoplacental cone. The yolk sac membranes consist of the parietal yolk sac (trophoblast giant cells and parietal endoderm) and the visceral yolk sac (visceral endoderm and extraembryonic mesoderm). The allantoic mesoderm forms the endothelial cell lining of fetal blood vessels in the labyrinth zone. Distinct regions of the placenta include the labyrinth, the spongiotrophoblast and a discontinuous layer of trophoblast giant cells. Lower: GATA transcription factor expression in mice. Expression of GATA transcription factors in mice is shown. Days on the right indicate days post coitus (dpc) when embryonic death occurs in mutant mice for various Gata genes.

GATA-regulated Genes

It is thought that GATA factors contribute to regulation of gene expression while balancing with an expression pattern and the expression level, and the expression level is important in GATAs' functions [32]. A number of genes regulated by GATA2 and/or GATA3 in trophoblast cells and placental tissues are shown in Table 3. GATA2 and GATA3 are expressed in TGC of the mouse placenta, and involved in placental development. Placentation sites lacking GATA2 have significantly less neovascularization compared with the wild-type placenta [33]. GATA2 was shown to contribute to both positive and negative regulation of mouse trophoblast cell-specific gene expressions [34]. GATA2 and GATA3 regulate trophoblast specific PL-1 (Prl3d1) and proliferin (Prl2c2) gene expression in vivo and in vitro in the mouse [33, 35], the rat [36] and the ovine [37]. We also found that GATA2 and/or GATA3 regulate TGC related factors such as PL-1, and HAND1 in bovine trophoblast CT-1 cells [16]. Furthermore, we examined whether or not GATA2 and GATA3 directly regulated TE-specific genes such as IFNT, CDX2, and PL-1 in bovine trophoblast CT-1 cells. Over-expression of GATA2 and/or GATA3 effectively upregulated these TE-specific gene-reporter constructs, transfected into bovine non-trophoblast ear fibroblast (EF) cells [15, 16]. These results are similar to previous studies in which GATA2 and GATA3 induced PL-1 transcription in transfected mouse non-trophoblast (fibroblast) cells [35]. These studies indicate that forced expression of GATA2 and/or GATA3 in non-trophoblast EF cells conditions the non-trophoblast cells to support TE-specific gene transcription. This does not preclude the possibility of other functions; GATA factors may control many other genes. In fact, DNA microarray and/or chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that GATA proteins are involved in transcriptional regulation of many genes in erythroid cells [38, 39]. For these reasons, GATA proteins should deserve deeper research into their ability to control TE differentiation and TE-specific gene transcription.
Table 3.

Genes regulated by GATA factors in the trophoblast

GATA factorsTarget gene (Symbol)SpeciesMethodsReferences
GATA2Proliferin (Prl2c2)mIm, ISH, NB[33]
GATA2Placental lactogen-I (LOC44319)sD, E, L[37]
GATA2Prolactin-like protein-A (Prl4a1)mISH [34]
GATA2P450 side chain cleavage (Cyp11a1)m, rC, E, L[65]
GATA2Placental lactogen-I (Prl3b1)rL, E[36]
GATA317β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase Type1 (HSD17B1)hC, E[66]
GATA3Caudal type homeobox 2 (Cdx2)mCh, Im, L, R, RI[13]
GATA2, GATA3Placental lactogen-I (Prl3d1)mC, D, E, ISH, NB[35]
GATA2, GATA3GnRH receptor (GNRHR)hD, E, L[67]
GATA2, GATA3Syncytin (ERVW)hD, E, L[68]
GATA2, GATA3GATA binding protein (Gata2)mCh, D, L, NB, R[47]
GATA2, GATA3Gonadotropin alpha subunit gene (CGA)hC, D, E, NB[69]

Species: h, humans; m, mice; r, rats; s, sheep. Methods: C, CAT assay; Ch, ChIP assay; D, DNase footprinting; E, EMSA; Im, immunohistochemical staining; ISH, in situ hybridization; L, Luciferase assay; NB, Northern blotting; R, RT-PCR; RI, RNA interference.

Species: h, humans; m, mice; r, rats; s, sheep. Methods: C, CAT assay; Ch, ChIP assay; D, DNase footprinting; E, EMSA; Im, immunohistochemical staining; ISH, in situ hybridization; L, Luciferase assay; NB, Northern blotting; R, RT-PCR; RI, RNA interference.

Self-regulation of GATAs in Hematopoiesis

The GATA proteins share conserved zinc finger DNA-binding domains that recognize the same GATA motif, by which they can regulate multiple developmental processes by binding to GATA motif regulatory element, and thereby, these proteins can regulate multiple developmental processes [4, 5, 40]. GATA proteins have both distinct and overlapping biological activities, and changes in occupancy in GATA protein at its binding site often affect the degree of target gene transcription [7, 8, 28,29,30,31]. During erythroid differentiation in mice, GATA1 and GATA2 directly regulate Gata2 transcription. GATA1 represses Gata2 transcription in association with four conserved GATA binding sites on the upstream region (–77, –3.9, –2.8, and –1.8 kb) along with an intron (+9.5 kb) region [41,42,43,44]. GATA2 is associated with these sites when Gata2 is in a transcriptionally active state [41,42,43,44]. The “GATA switch” is well stated by Brensnick et al. [45, 46].

Self-regulation of GATAs in Trophoblast Stem (TS) Cells and Trophoblast Cells

Besides this hematopoietic GATA switch, evidence of a GATA2/GATA3 switch has been gathered through studies of mouse TS cells. It was reported that changes in GATA2 or GATA3 occupancy occur at the –3.9 kb and +9.5 kb regions of the Gata2 gene during the differentiation process from TS cells to TGCs [47]. Binding of GATA3 directly represses the Gata2 gene in undifferentiated TS cells, and a switch in chromatin occupancy between GATA3 and GATA2 (GATA3/GATA2 switch) induces Gata2 transcription during TS cell differentiation. Recently, we also demonstrated that as bovine and/or ovine conceptus attachment begins, GATA2 and GATA3 mRNAs decrease when GATA1 mRNA increases concurrent with erythroid development (Fig. 2). Because high GATA1 mRNA appeared to coincide with reduced GATA2 and GATA3 mRNA expression at this time period, the effect of GATA1 was examined through over-expression of GATA1 in bovine trophoblast F3 cells, resulting in the down-regulation of endogenous GATA2 transcripts [22]. Although roles of GATA1 during conceptus attachment processes have not been characterized, these observations suggest that GATA1 is likely integral to conceptus development through the down-regulation of GATA2 transcription and possibly other developmentally important genes. Moreover, in situ hybridization studies revealed that both sense and antisense GATA1 [22] and GATA2 (unpublished observations) transcripts were present in trophoblast cells. It is now recognized that the natural antisense transcripts are important in governing cellular and organismal processes through transcriptional regulation [48] (see review, and references therein]. These natural anti-sense transcripts may be involved in the regulation of GATA gene transcriptions.
Fig. 2.

Embryonic and extraembryonic development, and GATA transcription factor expression in the cow. In ruminant species (bovine, ovine, and caprine), the blastocyst is formed several days after fertilization, but placentation starts on day 21, approximately two weeks later than in mice. Upper: Bovine conceptus developments. One of the unique features seen in ruminant conceptus development is trophoblast elongation. The trophoblast elongates exponentially and reaches a length of more than 150–300 mm before the initiation of its attachment to the uterine epithelium. Lower: Developmental events associated with bovine conceptuses, and GATA transcription factor expression. Arrows indicate the presence or increase (bold) in GATA expression during bovine conceptus development.

Embryonic and extraembryonic development, and GATA transcription factor expression in the cow. In ruminant species (bovine, ovine, and caprine), the blastocyst is formed several days after fertilization, but placentation starts on day 21, approximately two weeks later than in mice. Upper: Bovine conceptus developments. One of the unique features seen in ruminant conceptus development is trophoblast elongation. The trophoblast elongates exponentially and reaches a length of more than 150–300 mm before the initiation of its attachment to the uterine epithelium. Lower: Developmental events associated with bovine conceptuses, and GATA transcription factor expression. Arrows indicate the presence or increase (bold) in GATA expression during bovine conceptus development. Because trophoblast cells are unique to mammalian species, we examined the existence of the –3.9 kb and +9.5 kb regions of the Gata2 gene in several species. Interestingly, although the +9.5 kb GATA binding site of the Gata2 gene is preserved in several mammalian species, birds (Gallus gallus), and Zebra fish (Danio rerio), the –3.9 kb regulatory element is found in humans and mice, but not in birds or Zebra fish (Table 4), suggesting that the –3.9 kb GATA site functions in a trophoblast cell-specific manner.
Table 4.

Homology of candidate GATA switching sites

Species–3.9 kb region+9.5 kb region
HumansGAGATAGG --- GCTATCTGCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---TGTATCTG
MiceGAGATAGG --- GCTATCTGCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---TGTATCTG
RatsGAGATAGG --- GCTATCTGCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---TGTATCTG
CanisGAGATAGG --- GCTATCTGCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---CGTATCTG
EquineGAGATAGG --- ACTATCTGCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---TGTATCTG
BovineNo data availableCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---CGTATCTG
GallusNot foundCCTATCCG---TAGATAAG---CGTATCTG
DanioNot foundCCTATCCG---CAGATAAG---CTCCCGCC

Ruminants as an Animal Model

Rodents have been used as the primary animal models to study implantation processes. In mice, implantation occurs soon after blastocyst hatching from the zona pellucida. Within a span of a few embryonic days that extends from implantation to placentation, several dramatic and concurrent events occur in rodents. Therefore, it is difficult in rodents to delineate the underpinning molecular and accompanying cellular changes during this time period. However, in ruminants, the peri-implantation period is prolonged compared to rodents (Fig. 2), and thus, identification of key gene expression changes and developmental progression can be determined in these species. Although the duration of peri-attachment periods and types of implantation (invasive vs. non-invasive) differ, processes leading to conceptus implantation into the maternal endometrium are similar in most mammalian species [49]. In addition, the integrity of the bovine conceptus can be monitored through measurement of IFNT, the major protein implicated in the process of maternal recognition of pregnancy in ruminants [50,51,52]. For these reasons, ruminants may provide major advantages in characterizing processes associated with peri-implantation periods, possibly allowing the identification of a phenomenon and/or its gene expression overlooked in rodents.

Conclusions

Significant improvements in reproductive success are unlikely without first characterizing the complex interactions leading to successful implantation and eventual placentation. Because of mid-gestation embryonic loss in mouse gene ablation studies, GATA proteins have been considered not essential in mediating these processes. Recently, however, GATA proteins have emerged from scientific obscurity to be at the forefront of conceptus development studies. Although the various additional roles each GATA may undertake remain to be definitively established, the tantalizing insights into roles played by various GATAs provide strong impetus to clarify their effects on the peri-implantation process. There are many factors involved in the maintenance, proliferation and differentiation of the trophoblast cells. We would like to emphasize the point that GATA factors regulate the expression of trophoblast-specific factors in many species including humans, mice and ruminants during several stages of their development. More importantly, insights gained from ruminants can be applied to elucidation of molecular mechanisms associated with conceptus implantation in other mammalian species. Further research into GATA factors may allow us to more accurately identify pathways separating pregnancy success or failure, and thereby, potentially improve fertility rates in humans and in agriculturally important animals.
  69 in total

1.  RNA-seq analysis of the functional compartments within the rat placentation site.

Authors:  Kartik Shankar; Ying Zhong; Ping Kang; Michael L Blackburn; Michael J Soares; Thomas M Badger; Horacio Gomez-Acevedo
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst.

Authors:  Guoji Guo; Mikael Huss; Guo Qing Tong; Chaoyang Wang; Li Li Sun; Neil D Clarke; Paul Robson
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Gata3 regulates trophoblast development downstream of Tead4 and in parallel to Cdx2.

Authors:  Amy Ralston; Brian J Cox; Noriyuki Nishioka; Hiroshi Sasaki; Evelyn Chea; Peter Rugg-Gunn; Guoji Guo; Paul Robson; Jonathan S Draper; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Insights into GATA-1-mediated gene activation versus repression via genome-wide chromatin occupancy analysis.

Authors:  Ming Yu; Laura Riva; Huafeng Xie; Yocheved Schindler; Tyler B Moran; Yong Cheng; Duonan Yu; Ross Hardison; Mitchell J Weiss; Stuart H Orkin; Bradley E Bernstein; Ernest Fraenkel; Alan B Cantor
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Regulation of trophoblast-specific factors by GATA2 and GATA3 in bovine trophoblast CT-1 cells.

Authors:  Hanako Bai; Toshihiro Sakurai; Yohhei Someya; Toshihiro Konno; Atsushi Ideta; Yoshito Aoyagi; Kazuhiko Imakawa
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 6.  GATA switches as developmental drivers.

Authors:  Emery H Bresnick; Hsiang-Ying Lee; Tohru Fujiwara; Kirby D Johnson; Sunduz Keles
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Expression of GATA1 in the ovine conceptus and endometrium during the peri-attachment period.

Authors:  Hanako Bai; Toshihiro Sakurai; Toshihiro Konno; Atsushi Ideta; Yoshito Aoyagi; James D Godkin; Kazuhiko Imakawa
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Gata4 and Gata5 cooperatively regulate cardiac myocyte proliferation in mice.

Authors:  Manvendra K Singh; Yan Li; Shanru Li; Ryan M Cobb; Diane Zhou; Min Min Lu; Jonathan A Epstein; Edward E Morrisey; Peter J Gruber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Master regulatory GATA transcription factors: mechanistic principles and emerging links to hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Emery H Bresnick; Koichi R Katsumura; Hsiang-Ying Lee; Kirby D Johnson; Archibald S Perkins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Deterministic and stochastic allele specific gene expression in single mouse blastomeres.

Authors:  Fuchou Tang; Catalin Barbacioru; Ellen Nordman; Siqin Bao; Caroline Lee; Xiaohui Wang; Brian B Tuch; Edith Heard; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Atypical GATA protein TRPS1 plays indispensable roles in mouse two-cell embryo.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Songhua Xu; Xiuli Lian; Yang Su; Yuhuan Zhong; Ruimin Lv; Kaien Mo; Huimin Zhu; Wang Xiaojiang; Lixuan Xu; Shie Wang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Integrin α4-positive human trophoblast progenitors: functional characterization and transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  O Genbacev; N Larocque; K Ona; A Prakobphol; T Garrido-Gomez; M Kapidzic; A Bárcena; M Gormley; S J Fisher
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  In vitro modeling of early mammalian embryogenesis.

Authors:  Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Eric D Siggia; Mijo Simunovic
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-08

4.  Roles of GATA6 during Gonadal Development in Japanese Flounder: Gonadogenesis, Regulation of Gender-Related Genes, Estrogen Formation and Gonadal Function Maintenance.

Authors:  Zan Li; Xiumei Liu; Yan Sun; Jinxiang Liu; Yuezhong Liu; Mengxun Wang; Quanqi Zhang; Xubo Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Proximal GATA-binding sites are essential for human HSD3B1 gene transcription in the placenta.

Authors:  Tsai-Chun Lai; Hsiao-Fang Li; Yu-Shian Li; Pei-Yu Hung; Ming-Kwang Shyu; Meng-Chun Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Establishment of Trophectoderm Cell Lines from Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryos of Different Sources and Examination of In Vitro Developmental Competence, Quality, Epigenetic Status and Gene Expression in Cloned Embryos Derived from Them.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar Mohapatra; Anjit Sandhu; Karn Pratap Singh; Suresh Kumar Singla; Manmohan Singh Chauhan; Radheysham Manik; Prabhat Palta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Functional Conservation of the Glide/Gcm Regulatory Network Controlling Glia, Hemocyte, and Tendon Cell Differentiation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pierre B Cattenoz; Anna Popkova; Tony D Southall; Giuseppe Aiello; Andrea H Brand; Angela Giangrande
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  RASSF1A uncouples Wnt from Hippo signalling and promotes YAP mediated differentiation via p73.

Authors:  Angelos Papaspyropoulos; Leanne Bradley; Asmita Thapa; Chuen Yan Leung; Konstantinos Toskas; Delia Koennig; Dafni-Eleftheria Pefani; Cinzia Raso; Claudia Grou; Garth Hamilton; Nikola Vlahov; Anna Grawenda; Syed Haider; Jagat Chauhan; Ludovico Buti; Alexander Kanapin; Xin Lu; Francesca Buffa; Grigory Dianov; Alex von Kriegsheim; David Matallanas; Anastasia Samsonova; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz; Eric O'Neill
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Placenta-Specific Genes, Their Regulation During Villous Trophoblast Differentiation and Dysregulation in Preterm Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Andras Szilagyi; Zsolt Gelencser; Roberto Romero; Yi Xu; Peter Kiraly; Amanda Demeter; Janos Palhalmi; Balazs A Gyorffy; Kata Juhasz; Petronella Hupuczi; Katalin Adrienna Kekesi; Gudrun Meinhardt; Zoltan Papp; Sorin Draghici; Offer Erez; Adi Laurentiu Tarca; Martin Knöfler; Nandor Gabor Than
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Effects of miR-98 in intrauterine extracellular vesicles on maternal immune regulation during the peri-implantation period in cattle.

Authors:  Keigo Nakamura; Kazuya Kusama; Atsushi Ideta; Koji Kimura; Masatoshi Hori; Kazuhiko Imakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.