Literature DB >> 23427964

Early learning effect of residents for laparoscopic sigmoid resection.

Robbert Bosker1, Henk Groen, Christiaan Hoff, Eric Totte, Rutger Ploeg, Jean-Pierre Pierie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of learning the laparoscopic sigmoid resection procedure on resident surgeons; establish a minimum number of cases before a resident surgeon could be expected to achieve proficiency with the procedure; and examine if an analysis could be used to measure and support the clinical evaluation of the surgeon's competence with the procedure.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data which was prospective entered in the database. PARTICIPANTS: From 2003 to 2007 all patients who underwent a laparoscopic sigmoid resection carried out by senior residents, who completed the procedure as the primary surgeon proctored by an experienced surgeon, were included in the study. A cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) analysis was used evaluate performance. The procedure was defined as a failure if major intra-operative complications occurred such as intra abdominal organ injury, bleeding, or anastomotic leakage; if an inadequate number of lymph nodes (<12 nodes) were removed; or if conversion to an open surgical procedure was required.
RESULTS: Thirteen residents performed 169 laparoscopic sigmoid resections in the period evaluated. A significant majority of the resident surgeons were able to consistently perform the procedure without failure after 11 cases and determined to be competent. One resident was not determined to be competent and the CUSUM score supported these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that at least 11 cases are required for most residents to obtain necessary competence with the laparoscopic sigmoid resection procedure. Evaluation with the CUSUM analysis can be used to measure and support the clinical evaluation of the resident surgeon's competence with the procedure.
Copyright © 2013 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23427964     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Sigmoid resection for diverticulitis is more difficult than for malignancies.

Authors:  Maw Stam; W A Draaisma; Pcm Pasker; Ecj Consten; Iamj Broeders
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  An objective approach to evaluate novice robotic surgeons using a combination of kinematics and stepwise cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses.

Authors:  William B Lyman; Michael J Passeri; Keith Murphy; Imran A Siddiqui; Adeel S Khan; David A Iannitti; John B Martinie; Erin H Baker; Dionisios Vrochides
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J C Bolger; M P Broe; M A Zarog; A Looney; K McKevitt; D Walsh; S Giri; C Peirce; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Teaching and Training Surgeons in Robotic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Mark K Soliman; Alison J Tammany
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

6.  Recurrences and Ongoing Complaints of Diverticulitis; Results of a Survey among Gastroenterologists and Surgeons.

Authors:  M A W Stam; W A Draaisma; E C J Consten; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.588

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.