Literature DB >> 23426855

The antibody drug absorption following subcutaneous or intramuscular administration and its mathematical description by coupling physiologically based absorption process with the conventional compartment pharmacokinetic model.

Liang Zhao1, Ping Ji, Zhihong Li, Partha Roy, Chandrahas G Sahajwalla.   

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to propose a quantitative model to describe the absorption process for monoclonal antibody (mAb) following subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) administration. A hybrid model was established by coupling the physiologically based absorption process with a conventional pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) or PK model associated with intravenous infusion. Key physiological parameters evaluated include the volume distribution before systemic absorption, mAb drug clearance during lymphatic transport, the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) capacity, the intrinsic drug clearance via lysosomal proteolytic process, and the lymphatic flow rate. Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify those physiological parameters significantly impacting time to peak concentration (T(max)) or drug bioavailability. Simulation results showed that lymphatic flow rate is the only influential factor to T(max). Lymphatic transit time and drug clearance during lymphatic transport are most influential to bioavailability but not identifiable in their effects. Bioavailability is positively related to the lymphatic flow only at its low range (i.e., at <0.5-fold of the selected value of 0.043 mL/min). The rest of physiological parameters only have marginal effects on either drug bioavailability or T(max). Finally, simulation results confirmed lymphatic transport as the major route of mAb delivery.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426855     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  30 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations of therapeutic peptides.

Authors:  Lei Diao; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  A PBPK workflow for first-in-human dose selection of a subcutaneously administered pegylated peptide.

Authors:  Elliot Offman; Andrea N Edginton
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic antibodies in tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes.

Authors:  Eric Salgado; Yanguang Cao
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic (MBPK) models describe the complex plasma kinetics of three antiretrovirals delivered by a long-acting anti-HIV drug combination nanoparticle formulation.

Authors:  John C Kraft; Lisa A McConnachie; Josefin Koehn; Loren Kinman; Jianguo Sun; Ann C Collier; Carol Collins; Danny D Shen; Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Predicting monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration via whole-body physiologically-based modeling.

Authors:  Shihao Hu; David Z D'Argenio
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  In Vivo Stability of Therapeutic Proteins.

Authors:  Joachim Schuster; Atanas Koulov; Hanns-Christian Mahler; Pascal Detampel; Joerg Huwyler; Satish Singh; Roman Mathaes
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Understanding the in vivo fate of radioimmunoconjugates for nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Delphine Vivier; Sai Kiran Sharma; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.921

8.  Subcutaneous Site-of-Absorption Study with the Monoclonal Antibody Tocilizumab in Minipigs: Administration Behind Ear Translates Best to Humans.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Hans-Peter Grimm; Marie-Hélène Gouy; Susi Søgaard; Caroline Kreuzer; Uwe Wessels; Dragomir Draganov; Chris Muenzer; Tonio Hoche
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; Krishna K Machavaram; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Understanding the Monoclonal Antibody Disposition after Subcutaneous Administration using a Minimal Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Authors:  Ninad Varkhede; Laird Forrest
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.