Ninad Varkhede1, Laird Forrest1. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly administered by subcutaneous (SC) route. However, bioavailability is often reduced after SC administration. In addition, the sequential transfer of mAbs through the SC tissue and lymphatic system is not completely understood. Therefore, major objectives of this study were a) To understand absorption of mAbs via the lymphatic system after SC administration using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, and b) to demonstrate application of the model for prediction of SC pharmacokinetics (PK) of mAbs. METHODS: A minimal PBPK model was constructed using various physiological parameters related to the SC injection site and lymphatic system. The remainder of the body organs were represented using a 2-compartment model (central and peripheral compartments), with parameters derived from available intravenous (IV) PK data. The IV and SC clinical PK data of a total of 10 mAbs were obtained from literature. The SC PK data were used to estimate the lymphatic trunk-lymph node (LN) clearance. RESULTS: The mean estimated lymphatic trunk-LN clearance obtained from 37 SC PK profiles of mAbs was 0.00213 L/h (0.001332 to 0.002928, 95% confidence intervals). The estimated lymphatic trunk-LN clearance was greater for the mAbs with higher isoelectric point (pI). In addition, the estimated clearance increased with decrease in the bioavailability. CONCLUSION: The minimal PBPK model identified SC injection site lymph flow, afferent and efferent lymph flows, and volumes associated with the SC injection site, lymphatic capillaries and lymphatic trunk-LN as important physiological parameters governing the absorption of mAbs after SC administration. The model may be used to predict PK of mAbs using the relationship of lymphatic trunk-LN clearance and the pI. In addition, the model can be used as a bottom platform to incorporate SC and lymphatic in vitro clearance data for mAb PK prediction in the future.
PURPOSE: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly administered by subcutaneous (SC) route. However, bioavailability is often reduced after SC administration. In addition, the sequential transfer of mAbs through the SC tissue and lymphatic system is not completely understood. Therefore, major objectives of this study were a) To understand absorption of mAbs via the lymphatic system after SC administration using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, and b) to demonstrate application of the model for prediction of SC pharmacokinetics (PK) of mAbs. METHODS: A minimal PBPK model was constructed using various physiological parameters related to the SC injection site and lymphatic system. The remainder of the body organs were represented using a 2-compartment model (central and peripheral compartments), with parameters derived from available intravenous (IV) PK data. The IV and SC clinical PK data of a total of 10 mAbs were obtained from literature. The SC PK data were used to estimate the lymphatic trunk-lymph node (LN) clearance. RESULTS: The mean estimated lymphatic trunk-LN clearance obtained from 37 SC PK profiles of mAbs was 0.00213 L/h (0.001332 to 0.002928, 95% confidence intervals). The estimated lymphatic trunk-LN clearance was greater for the mAbs with higher isoelectric point (pI). In addition, the estimated clearance increased with decrease in the bioavailability. CONCLUSION: The minimal PBPK model identified SC injection site lymph flow, afferent and efferent lymph flows, and volumes associated with the SC injection site, lymphatic capillaries and lymphatic trunk-LN as important physiological parameters governing the absorption of mAbs after SC administration. The model may be used to predict PK of mAbs using the relationship of lymphatic trunk-LN clearance and the pI. In addition, the model can be used as a bottom platform to incorporate SC and lymphatic in vitro clearance data for mAb PK prediction in the future.
Authors: Honghui Zhou; Haishan Jang; Roy M Fleischmann; Esther Bouman-Thio; Zhenhua Xu; Joseph C Marini; Charles Pendley; Qun Jiao; Gopi Shankar; Stanley J Marciniak; Stanley B Cohen; Mahboob U Rahman; Daniel Baker; Mary Ann Mascelli; Hugh M Davis; Daniel E Everitt Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: René Westhovens; Frédéric Houssiau; Johan Joly; Daniel E Everitt; Yaowei Zhu; Deborah Sisco; Bart Van Hartingsveldt; Mary Ann Mascelli; Martin A Graham; Patrick Durez; Esther Bouman-Thio Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Michael H Weisman; Larry W Moreland; Daniel E Furst; Michael E Weinblatt; Edward C Keystone; Harold E Paulus; Leah S Teoh; Raja B Velagapudi; Peter A Noertersheuser; G Richard Granneman; Steven A Fischkoff; Elliot K Chartash Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.393