Literature DB >> 23426766

Thickness of subcutaneous fat as a risk factor for infection in cervical spine fusion surgery.

Ankit I Mehta1, Ranjith Babu, Richa Sharma, Isaac O Karikari, Betsy H Grunch, Timothy R Owens, Vijay J Agarwal, John H Sampson, Shivanand P Lad, Allan H Friedman, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Carlos A Bagley, Oren N Gottfried.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections increase the incidence of morbidity and mortality as well as health-care expenses. The cost of care increases threefold to fourfold as a consequence of surgical site infection after spinal surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of subcutaneous fat thickness in the development of surgical site infection following cervical spine fusion surgery.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of 213 adult patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion between 2006 and 2008 at Duke University Medical Center. The horizontal distance from the lamina to the skin surface at the C5 level and the thickness of subcutaneous fat were measured, and the ratio of the fat thickness to the total distance at the surgical site was determined. Previously identified risk factors for the development of surgical site infection were also recorded.
RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 213 patients developed a postoperative infection. Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) was not a significant risk factor for surgical site infection; the body mass index (and 95% confidence interval) was 29.4 ± 1.2 kg/m2 in the patients who developed a surgical site infection compared with 28.9 ± 0.94 kg/m2 in the patients without an infection. However, the thickness of subcutaneous fat and the ratio of the fat thickness to the lamina-to-skin distance were both significant risk factors for infection. The thickness of subcutaneous fat was 27.0 ± 2.5 mm in the patients who developed a surgical site infection group compared with 21.4 ± 0.88 mm in the patients without an infection (p = 0.042). The ratio of fat thickness to total thickness was 0.42 ± 0.019 in the patients who developed a surgical site infection compared with 0.35 ± 0.01 in the patients without an infection (p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis revealed this ratio to be an independent risk factor for developing a postoperative infection (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 9.97).
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the thickness of subcutaneous fat at the surgical site is a factor in the development of surgical site infection following cervical spine fusion and deserves assessment in the preoperative evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426766     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

Review 1.  Body mass index and risk of surgical site infection following spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dima Y Abdallah; Mutaz M Jadaan; John P McCabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Risk factors for surgical site infection following posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion].

Authors:  Chaohui Sang; Hailong Ren; Zhandong Meng; Jianming Jiang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-07-30

Review 3.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Diabetes and Risk of Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily T Martin; Keith S Kaye; Caitlin Knott; Huong Nguyen; Maressa Santarossa; Richard Evans; Elizabeth Bertran; Linda Jaber
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Does peritrochanteric fat thickness increase the risk of early reoperation for infection or wound complications following total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Joshua A Bell; Andrew Jeong; Daniel D Bohl; Brett Levine; Craig Della Valle; Denis Nam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

6.  Surgical site infection in overweight and obese Total Knee Arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Christopher John Wilson; Kristen Renee Georgiou; Ezekiel Oburu; Annika Theodoulou; Angela H Deakin; Jeganath Krishnan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21

7.  Tumor volume is a better predictor of post-operative wound complications compared to tumor size in soft tissue sarcomas of the proximal lower extremity.

Authors:  Michael Ziegele; David M King; Manpreet Bedi
Journal:  Clin Sarcoma Res       Date:  2016-02-22

8.  Soft-tissue thickness radiographic measurement: a marker to evaluate acute periprosthetic joint infection risk in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Laura Rey Fernández; Francesc Angles Crespo; Silvia María Miguela Álvarez; Martí Carles Bernaus-Johnson; Agustí Bartra Ylla; Lluís Font-Vizcarra
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-06-04

9.  Underweight patients are at just as much risk as super morbidly obese patients when undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Taylor D Ottesen; Rohil Malpani; Anoop R Galivanche; Cheryl K Zogg; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 10.  The Effects of Obesity on Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Keith L Jackson; John G Devine
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.