Literature DB >> 23426670

Transcription of the immediate-early gene Arc in CA1 of the hippocampus reveals activity differences along the proximodistal axis that are attenuated by advanced age.

Andrea L Hartzell1, Sara N Burke, Lan T Hoang, James P Lister, Crystal N Rodriguez, Carol A Barnes.   

Abstract

The CA1 region of the hippocampus receives distinct patterns of afferent input to distal (near subiculum) and proximal (near CA2) zones. Specifically, distal CA1 receives a direct projection from cells in the lateral entorhinal cortex that are sensitive to objects, whereas proximal CA1 is innervated by cells in the medial entorhinal cortex that are responsive to space. This suggests that neurons in different areas along the proximodistal axis of CA1 of the hippocampus will be functionally distinct. The current experiment investigated this possibility by monitoring behavior-induced cell activity across the CA1 axis using Arc mRNA imaging methods that compared adult and old rats in two conditions: (1) exploration of the same environment containing the same objects twice (AA) or (2) exploration of two different environments that contained identical objects (AB). The hypothesis was that CA1 place cells should show field remapping in the condition in which environments were changed, but the extent of remapping was expected to differ between proximal and distal regions and between age groups. In fact, neurons in the proximal region of CA1 in adult animals exhibited a greater degree of remapping than did distal CA1 cells when the environment changed, suggesting that cells receiving input from the medial entorhinal cortex are more sensitive to spatial context. However, in old rats, there were no differences in remapping across the proximodistal CA1 axis. Together, these data suggest that distal and proximal CA1 may be functionally distinct and differentially vulnerable to normative aging processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426670      PMCID: PMC3711759          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4727-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

1.  Functional integrity of NMDA-dependent LTP induction mechanisms across the lifespan of F-344 rats.

Authors:  C A Barnes; G Rao; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Spatial representation along the proximodistal axis of CA1.

Authors:  Espen J Henriksen; Laura L Colgin; Carol A Barnes; Menno P Witter; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Imaging correlates of brain function in monkeys and rats isolates a hippocampal subregion differentially vulnerable to aging.

Authors:  Scott A Small; Monica K Chawla; Michael Buonocore; Peter R Rapp; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of population coherence of place cells in hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3.

Authors:  Inah Lee; D Yoganarasimha; Geeta Rao; James J Knierim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cognitive demands induce selective hippocampal reorganization: Arc expression in a place and response task.

Authors:  Brandy Schmidt; Elham Satvat; Melissa Argraves; Etan J Markus; Diano F Marrone
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 6.  Neurocognitive aging: prior memories hinder new hippocampal encoding.

Authors:  Iain A Wilson; Michela Gallagher; Howard Eichenbaum; Heikki Tanila
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data.

Authors:  A Ennaceur; J Delacour
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1988-11-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The influence of objects on place field expression and size in distal hippocampal CA1.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Andrew P Maurer; Saman Nematollahi; Ajay R Uprety; Jenelle L Wallace; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where.

Authors:  Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat.

Authors:  R Morris
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  26 in total

1.  Sublayer-Specific Coding Dynamics during Spatial Navigation and Learning in Hippocampal Area CA1.

Authors:  Nathan B Danielson; Jeffrey D Zaremba; Patrick Kaifosh; John Bowler; Max Ladow; Attila Losonczy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Yasaman Alaghband; Ashley A Keiser; Tri N Dong; Christina M Michael; Diane Rhee; Guanhua Shu; Richard T Dang; Dina P Matheos; Marcelo A Wood
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Towards a circuit-level understanding of hippocampal CA1 dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease across anatomical axes.

Authors:  Arjun V Masurkar
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism       Date:  2018-01-09

4.  Rodent age-related impairments in discriminating perceptually similar objects parallel those observed in humans.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Sean M Turner; Lindsay A Santacroce; Katelyn N Carty; Leila Shafiq; Jennifer L Bizon; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 5.  CA1 pyramidal cell diversity enabling parallel information processing in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Ivan Soltesz; Attila Losonczy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Postsynaptic integrative properties of dorsal CA1 pyramidal neuron subpopulations.

Authors:  Arjun V Masurkar; Chengju Tian; Richard Warren; Isabel Reyes; Daniel C Lowes; David H Brann; Steven A Siegelbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Behavior-driven arc expression is reduced in all ventral hippocampal subfields compared to CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus in rat dorsal hippocampus.

Authors:  M K Chawla; V L Sutherland; K Olson; B L McNaughton; C A Barnes
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Dissociable effects of advanced age on prefrontal cortical and medial temporal lobe ensemble activity.

Authors:  Abbi R Hernandez; Jordan E Reasor; Leah M Truckenbrod; Keila T Campos; Quinten P Federico; Kaeli E Fertal; Katelyn N Lubke; Sarah A Johnson; Benjamin J Clark; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Head west or left, east or right: interactions between memory systems in neurocognitive aging.

Authors:  Inês Tomás Pereira; Michela Gallagher; Peter R Rapp
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Age-related changes in Egr1 transcription and DNA methylation within the hippocampus.

Authors:  M R Penner; R R Parrish; L T Hoang; T L Roth; F D Lubin; C A Barnes
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.