BACKGROUND: HDL size and composition vary among individuals and may be associated with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. We investigated the theoretical relationship between HDL size and composition using an updated version of the spherical model of lipoprotein structure proposed by Shen et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977;74:837-41.) and compared its predictions with experimental data from the Women's Health Study (WHS). METHODS: The Shen model was updated to predict the relationship between HDL diameter and the ratio of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) to apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) plasma concentrations (HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio). In the WHS (n = 26 772), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) was used to measure the mean HDL diameter (d(mean,NMR)) and particle concentration (HDL-P); HDL-C and ApoA-I (mg/dL) were measured by standardized assays. RESULTS: The updated Shen model predicts a quasilinear increase of HDL diameter with the HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio, consistent with the d(mean,NMR) values from WHS, which ranged between 8.0 and 10.8 nm and correlated positively with the HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio (r = 0.608, P < 2.2 × 10(-16)). The WHS data were further described by a linear regression equation: d(WHS) = 4.66 nm + 12.31(HDL-C/Apo-I), where d(WHS) is expressed in nanometers. The validity of this equation for estimating HDL size was assessed with data from cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency and pharmacologic inhibition. We also illustrate how HDL-P can be estimated from the HDL size and ApoA-I concentration. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a large-scale experimental examination of the updated Shen model. The results offer new insights into HDL structure, composition and remodeling and suggest that the HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio might be a readily available biomarker for estimating HDL size and HDL-P.
BACKGROUND: HDL size and composition vary among individuals and may be associated with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. We investigated the theoretical relationship between HDL size and composition using an updated version of the spherical model of lipoprotein structure proposed by Shen et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977;74:837-41.) and compared its predictions with experimental data from the Women's Health Study (WHS). METHODS: The Shen model was updated to predict the relationship between HDL diameter and the ratio of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) to apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) plasma concentrations (HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio). In the WHS (n = 26 772), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) was used to measure the mean HDL diameter (d(mean,NMR)) and particle concentration (HDL-P); HDL-C and ApoA-I (mg/dL) were measured by standardized assays. RESULTS: The updated Shen model predicts a quasilinear increase of HDL diameter with the HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio, consistent with the d(mean,NMR) values from WHS, which ranged between 8.0 and 10.8 nm and correlated positively with the HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio (r = 0.608, P < 2.2 × 10(-16)). The WHS data were further described by a linear regression equation: d(WHS) = 4.66 nm + 12.31(HDL-C/Apo-I), where d(WHS) is expressed in nanometers. The validity of this equation for estimating HDL size was assessed with data from cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency and pharmacologic inhibition. We also illustrate how HDL-P can be estimated from the HDL size and ApoA-I concentration. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a large-scale experimental examination of the updated Shen model. The results offer new insights into HDL structure, composition and remodeling and suggest that the HDL-C/ApoA-I ratio might be a readily available biomarker for estimating HDL size and HDL-P.
Authors: Ronald M Krauss; Kathleen Wojnooski; Joseph Orr; J Casey Geaney; Cathy Anne Pinto; Yang Liu; John A Wagner; Julie Mabalot Luk; Amy O Johnson-Levonas; Matt S Anderson; Hayes M Dansky Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2011-12-17 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Robert S Rosenson; H Bryan Brewer; M John Chapman; Sergio Fazio; M Mahmood Hussain; Anatol Kontush; Ronald M Krauss; James D Otvos; Alan T Remaley; Ernst J Schaefer Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Christie M Ballantyne; Michael Miller; Eric J Niesor; Tracy Burgess; David Kallend; Evan A Stein Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Philip Greenland; David C Goff; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Christopher T Sibley; Samia Mora Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christopher P Cannon; Sukrut Shah; Hayes M Dansky; Michael Davidson; Eliot A Brinton; Antonio M Gotto; Michael Stepanavage; Sherry Xueyu Liu; Patrice Gibbons; Tanya B Ashraf; Jennifer Zafarino; Yale Mitchel; Philip Barter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Juan G Juárez-Rojas; Ivan Torre-Villalvazo; Aida X Medina-Urrutia; Juan Reyes-Barrera; Víctor H Sainz-Escárrega; Carlos Posadas-Romero; Alejandro Macías-Cruz; Esteban Jorge-Galarza Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Gilberto Vargas-Alarcón; María Del Carmen González-Salazar; Christian Vázquez-Vázquez; Adrián Hernández-Díaz Couder; Fausto Sánchez-Muñoz; Juan Reyes-Barrera; Sergio A Criales-Vera; Marco Sánchez-Guerra; Citlalli Osorio-Yáñez; Rosalinda Posadas-Sánchez Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.599