Literature DB >> 23422789

A comment on 'A morpho-molecular prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma'.

Halil I Sahin, A Kaseb.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422789      PMCID: PMC3593531          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We read with great interest the recent study by Srivastava regarding a new staging model for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, the authors constructed a new risk model for the prognostic evaluation of HCC. In the final system, CD31, p53, AFP, CD44, tumour size and vascular invasion were included for risk score calculation. Patients were dichotomised into high- and low-score groups using the cut-off point, 3.240, which was found to be the median final score in the study population. Srivastava demonstrated significantly decreased overall survival in the high-score group and validated these results in another cohort. We would like to discuss a couple of points about the patient characteristics and risk factors included in the study. First, we feel that there is not enough description of the study population regarding the status of the underlying liver disease, which is also an independent predictor of survival in patients with HCC. The authors did not specify pertinent parameters to assess liver disease, such as the Child–Pugh score, or the incidence of cirrhosis, on the basis of imaging or pathological criteria. Second, although CD44 overexpression is a cancer stem cell marker (Zhu ) and was found to be a poor prognostic factor in HCC, it was not found to be significantly overexpressed in tumour tissue compared with in adjacent non-tumour hepatic tissue in this study. Increased expression of CD44, which was considered in this study to be a cancer stem cell marker, was also observed in inflammation and mediates tumorigenesis (Heldin ). In animal models, CD44 knockdown was shown to decrease inflammation in the liver (Kimura ). Therefore, CD44 expression in non-tumour hepatic may indicate an underlying ongoing inflammation in liver. Thus, in this study, the poor prognostic value of overexpressed CD44 may partially reflect the severity of the underlying liver disease rather than being a marker of tumour cell stemness. In conclusion, although this morpho-molecular prognostic model for HCC promisingly identified HCC patients with different risk factors, the absence of parameters pertinent to the underlying liver function will make it challenging to interpret the study results. Moreover, the role of CD44 in this staging model should be also clarified.
  4 in total

1.  Critical role of CD44 in hepatotoxin-mediated liver injury.

Authors:  Kiminori Kimura; Masahito Nagaki; Kazuhiro Kakimi; Masanao Saio; Tomomi Saeki; Yumiko Okuda; Kazuo Kuwata; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Importance of hyaluronan-CD44 interactions in inflammation and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Paraskevi Heldin; Eugenia Karousou; Berit Bernert; Helena Porsch; Koichi Nishitsuka; Spyros S Skandalis
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.417

3.  Cancer stem/progenitor cells are highly enriched in CD133+CD44+ population in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Zheng Zhu; Xiangfang Hao; Mingxia Yan; Ming Yao; Chao Ge; Jianren Gu; Jinjun Li
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  A morpho-molecular prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  S Srivastava; K F Wong; C W Ong; C Y Huak; K G Yeoh; M Teh; J M Luk; M Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reply: a morpho-molecular prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  S Srivastava; M Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.