Literature DB >> 23422094

Promoter CpG island hypermethylation of the DNA repair enzyme MGMT predicts clinical response to dacarbazine in a phase II study for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Alessio Amatu1, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Catia Moutinho, Alessandro Belotti, Katia Bencardino, Giuseppe Chirico, Andrea Cassingena, Francesca Rusconi, Anna Esposito, Michele Nichelatti, Manel Esteller, Salvatore Siena.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein removing mutagenic and cytotoxic adducts from O(6)-guanine in DNA. Approximately 40% of colorectal cancers (CRC) display MGMT deficiency due to the promoter hypermethylation leading to silencing of the gene. Alkylating agents, such as dacarbazine, exert their antitumor activity by DNA methylation at the O(6)-guanine site, inducing base pair mismatch; therefore, activity of dacarbazine could be enhanced in CRCs lacking MGMT. We conducted a phase II study with dacarbazine in CRCs who had failed standard therapies (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluoropyrimidines, and cetuximab or panitumumab if KRAS wild-type). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: All patients had tumor tissue assessed for MGMT as promoter hypermethylation in double-blind for treatment outcome. Patients received dacarbazine 250 mg/m(2) intravenously every day for four consecutive days, every 21 days, until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. We used a Simon two-stage design to determine whether the overall response rate would be 10% or more. Secondary endpoints included association of response, progression-free survival, and disease control rate with MGMT status.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled from May 2011 to March 2012. Patients received a median of three cycles of dacarbazine (range 1-12). Grades 3 and 4 toxicities included: fatigue (41%), nausea/vomiting (29%), constipation (25%), platelet count decrease (19%), and anemia (18%). Overall, two patients (3%) achieved partial response and eight patients (12%) had stable disease. Disease control rate (partial response + stable disease) was significantly associated with MGMT promoter hypermethylation in the corresponding tumors.
CONCLUSION: Objective clinical responses to dacarbazine in patients with metastatic CRC are confined to those tumors harboring epigenetic inactivation of the DNA repair enzyme MGMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422094     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  MGMT promoter methylation status in Merkel cell carcinoma: in vitro versus invivo.

Authors:  Giuseppina Improta; Cathrin Ritter; Angela Pettinato; Valeria Vasta; David Schrama; Filippo Fraggetta; Jürgen C Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Mapping clinicopathological entities within colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas: a hierarchical clustering approach.

Authors:  Charly Liddell; Laure Droy-Dupré; Sylvie Métairie; Fabrice Airaud; Christelle Volteau; Stéphane Bezieau; Christian L Laboisse; Jean-François Mosnier
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Isaac A Chaim; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

4.  Aberrant promoter methylation of the SFRP1 gene may contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Zhi Chen; Dan Liu; Yu-Xia Zhao; He-Tong Wang; Ya Gao; Ying Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-06-15

5.  ZNF695 methylation predicts a response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Takamasa Takahashi; Satoshi Yamahsita; Yasunori Matsuda; Takayoshi Kishino; Takeshi Nakajima; Ryoji Kushima; Ken Kato; Hiroyasu Igaki; Yuji Tachimori; Harushi Osugi; Masato Nagino; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Epigenome-wide association study reveals a molecular signature of response to phylloquinone (vitamin K1) supplementation.

Authors:  Kenneth Westerman; Jennifer M Kelly; José M Ordovás; Sarah L Booth; Dawn L DeMeo
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 8.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabio Coppedè; Angela Lopomo; Roberto Spisni; Lucia Migliore
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Progression of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and temozolomide resistance in cancer research.

Authors:  Guan Jiang; Ai-Jun Jiang; Yong Xin; Lian-Tao Li; Qian Cheng; Jun-Nian Zheng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 10.  Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Yoshinaga Okugawa; William M Grady; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.