| Literature DB >> 23420384 |
Sushil Kumar Yadav1, Sweety Katikala, Varalaxmi Yellisetty, Annapurna Kannepalle, Jyothi Lakshmi Narayana, Vanaja Maddi, Maheswari Mandapaka, Arun Kumar Shanker, Venkateswarlu Bandi, Kirti Pulugurtha Bharadwaja.
Abstract
A reproducible and highly efficient protocol for genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium has been established for greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Double cotyledonary node (DCN) explants were inoculated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA 4404 harboring a binary vector pCAMBIA 2301 containing neomycin phosphotransferase (npt II) gene as selectable marker, β-glucuronidase (GUS) as a reporter (uidA) gene and annexin 1 bj gene. Important parameters like optical density of Agrobacterium culture, culture quantity, infection medium, infection and co-cultivation time and acetosyringone concentration were standardized to optimize the transformation frequency. Kanamycin at a concentration of 100 mg/l was used to select transformed cells. Transient and stable GUS expressions were studied in transformed explants and regenerated putative plants, respectively. Transformed shoot were produced on regeneration medium containing 100 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l cefotaxime and rooted on ½ MS medium. Transient and constitutive GUS expression was observed in DCN explants and different tissues of T(0) and T(1) plants. Rooted T(0) and T(1) shoots confirming Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) positive for npt II and annexin 1bj genes were taken to maturity to collect the seeds. Integration of annexin gene into the greengram genome was confirmed by Southern blotting.Entities:
Keywords: Agrobacterium mediated transformation; Annexin; Double cotyledonary node; Vigna radiata
Year: 2012 PMID: 23420384 PMCID: PMC3570761 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-1-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Transformation efficiency expressed in percentage equal to number of explants regenerated and showing PCR amplification/Total number of explants infected × 100
| No. of explants infected | No. of explants regenerated on kanamycin | No. of hardened plants showing PCR amplification | Transformation efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 700 | 200 | 30 | 4.2 |
Figure 1Kanamycin kill curve.
Observed effects of different concentrations of kanamycin on DCN explant
| Kanamycin conc (mg/L) | Regeneration response |
|---|---|
| 0 | Green shoots regenerated |
| 25 | Green shoots regenerated |
| 50 | Green shoots regenerated |
| 75 | Pale green shoots were found |
| 100 | No shoots observed |
| 150 | Explants were bleached |
Figure 2Stable GUS activity in Tleaf Tseedling (transformed & control).
Figure 3(a) PCR verification of Tputative transgenics in greengram usingprimers. Lane 1: MW marker, 2: Prositive Control, 3: Negative Control, 4-10: Putative transgenic plants. (b) PCR verification of T0 transgenics in greengram using gene specific primers. Lane 1: MW marker, 2: Positive control, 3: Negative control, 4-10: Putative transgenic lines.
Figure 4PCR verification of Ttransgenics in greengram using gene specific primers. Lane 1: MW marker, 2: Positive control, 3: Negative control, 4-7: Putative transgenic lines.
Figure 5Southern blot hybridization of the Tputativetransgenic greengram plants. Leaf genomic DNA was digested with Pst I, separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% gel, blotted onto Hybond N + membrane and probed with a 941 by annexin sequence. Lane 1: Positive control (pCAMBIA 2301 + annexin digested with Pst I to release 1.5 kb fragment; Lane 2-3: Empty; Lane 4: Negative control; Lane 5-9: T0 transformants in which events 7-9 were positive.
Figure 6Schematic representation of T-DNA region of pCAMBIA 2301 havinggene (6345bp).
Figure 7Restriction enzyme sites ingene cassetter (1.5Kb).