Literature DB >> 23420229

D optimal designs for three Poisson dose-response models.

Alan Maloney1, Ulrika S H Simonsson, Marloes Schaddelee.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to find and investigate the performance of the D optimal designs for three Poisson dose-response models. Phase II dose ranging studies are pivotal in the drug development program, being used to select dose(s) for phase III. Count data is encountered in a number of clinical areas. The Poisson distribution provides an intuitive platform for modelling such data, especially when combined with random effects which allow subjects to differ in their response rates. This work investigated three Poisson dose-response models of increasing complexity. A simple E(max) model was used to describe the drug effect, and D optimal designs under a range of different parameter values (scenarios) were found. The relative performances between scenarios were assessed using: the precision of all parameters, the precision of the drug effect parameters, and the percent coefficient of variation (%CV) of the ED(50) parameter. The results showed that the D optimal designs were similar across models and scenarios, with the D optimal designs consisting of placebo, the maximum dose, and a dose just below the ED(50). However the relative performance of the optimal designs was very different. For example, with 1,000 subjects, the %CV of the ED(50) parameter ranged from 1.4 to 91 %. Performance typically improved with higher baseline counts, smaller random effects, and larger E(max). This work introduces a framework for determining and evaluating the performance of D optimal designs for phase II dose ranging studies with count data as the primary endpoint.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420229     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-013-9300-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  12 in total

1.  Sample size/power calculations for population pharmacodynamic experiments involving repeated-count measurements.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Optimal adaptive design in clinical drug development: a simulation example.

Authors:  Alan Maloney; Mats O Karlsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Performance in population models for count data, part I: maximum likelihood approximations.

Authors:  Elodie L Plan; Alan Maloney; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Optimization of the intravenous glucose tolerance test in T2DM patients using optimal experimental design.

Authors:  Hanna E Silber; Joakim Nyberg; Andrew C Hooker; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  D-optimal designs for parameter estimation for indirect pharmacodynamic response models.

Authors:  Leonid A Khinkis; Wojciech Krzyzanski; William J Jusko; William R Greco
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Population Fisher information matrix and optimal design of discrete data responses in population pharmacodynamic experiments.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Quantitative characterization of therapeutic index: application of mixed-effects modeling to evaluate oxybutynin dose-efficacy and dose-side effect relationships.

Authors:  S K Gupta; G Sathyan; E A Lindemulder; P L Ho; L B Sheiner; L Aarons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Dose-response population analysis of levetiracetam add-on treatment in refractory epileptic patients with partial onset seizures.

Authors:  Eric Snoeck; Armel Stockis
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Optimisation of sampling windows design for population pharmacokinetic experiments.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Drug-drug interaction predictions with PBPK models and optimal multiresponse sampling time designs: application to midazolam and a phase I compound. Part 2: clinical trial results.

Authors:  Marylore Chenel; François Bouzom; Fanny Cazade; Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons; France Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.