Literature DB >> 19904585

D-optimal designs for parameter estimation for indirect pharmacodynamic response models.

Leonid A Khinkis1, Wojciech Krzyzanski, William J Jusko, William R Greco.   

Abstract

This report generates efficient experimental designs (dose, sampling times) for parameter estimation for four basic physiologic indirect pharmacodynamic response (IDR) models. The principles underlying IDR models and their response patterns have been well described. Each IDR model explicitly contains four parameters, k (in) (production), k (out) (loss), I (max)/S (max) (capacity) and IC (50)/SC (50) (sensitivity). The pharmacokinetics of an IV dose of drug described by a monoexponential function of time with two parameters, V and k (el), is assumed. The random errors in the response variable are assumed to be additive, independent, and normal with zero mean and variance proportional to some power of the mean response. Optimal design theory was used extensively to assess the role of both dose and sampling times. Our designs were generated in Mathematica (ADAPT 5 typically produces identical results). G-optimality was used to verify that the generated designs were indeed D-optimal. Such designs are efficient and robust when good prior knowledge of the estimated parameters is available. The efficiency of unconstrained D-optimal designs (4 dose, sampling time pairs) does not improve much when the drug doses are allowed to differ, compared with constrained single dose designs (4 sampling times) with one maximal feasible dose. Also, explored were efficiencies of alternative study designs and results from parameter misspecification. This analysis substantiates the importance of larger doses yielding greater certainty in parameter estimation in pharmacodynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19904585      PMCID: PMC3752677          DOI: 10.1007/s10928-009-9135-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  16 in total

1.  Development and implementation of the population Fisher information matrix for the evaluation of population pharmacokinetic designs.

Authors:  S Retout; S Duffull; F Mentré
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Robust optimal design for the estimation of hyperparameters in population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M Tod; F Mentré; Y Merlé; A Mallet
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-12

3.  Simultaneous optimal experimental design on dose and sample times.

Authors:  Joakim Nyberg; Mats O Karlsson; Andrew C Hooker
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses.

Authors:  A Sharma; W J Jusko
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Comparison of ED, EID, and API criteria for the robust optimization of sampling times in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M Tod; J M Rocchisani
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-08

6.  Fitting heteroscedastic regression models to individual pharmacokinetic data using standard statistical software.

Authors:  D M Giltinan; D Ruppert
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1989-10

7.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  N L Dayneka; V Garg; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-08

8.  Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects.

Authors:  W J Jusko; H C Ko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Extended least squares nonlinear regression: a possible solution to the "choice of weights" problem in analysis of individual pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  C C Peck; S L Beal; L B Sheiner; A I Nichols
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-10

10.  Implementation of OSPOP, an algorithm for the estimation of optimal sampling times in pharmacokinetics by the ED, EID and API criteria.

Authors:  M Tod; J M Rocchisani
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

1.  An example of optimal phase II design for exposure response modelling.

Authors:  Alan Maloney; Marloes Schaddelee; Jan Freijer; Walter Krauwinkel; Marcel van Gelderen; Philippe Jacqmin; Ulrika S H Simonsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  D optimal designs for three Poisson dose-response models.

Authors:  Alan Maloney; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Marloes Schaddelee
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  The additive damage model: a mathematical model for cellular responses to drug combinations.

Authors:  Leslie Braziel Jones; Timothy W Secomb; Mark W Dewhirst; Ardith W El-Kareh
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  Lifespan based indirect response models.

Authors:  Wojciech Krzyzanski; Juan Jose Perez Ruixo
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting to assess plasma clearance of inert renal markers.

Authors:  Carl A Wesolowski; Richard C Puetter; Lin Ling; Paul S Babyn
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.745

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.