Literature DB >> 2341939

A 3-year evaluation of skeletal stability of mandibular advancement with rigid fixation.

M J Kierl1, R S Nanda, G F Currier.   

Abstract

The postsurgical changes associated with mandibular advancements using the sagittal ramus osteotomy and rigid fixation were evaluated. This retrospective study was based on examination of lateral cephalometric radiographs of 19 individuals (16 females and 3 males) with a mean age of 26.6 years. These radiographs were evaluated presurgically, immediately postsurgery, and 3 years postsurgically (2 years, 9 months to 4 years, 5 months). The mean amount of sagittal surgical advancement was 6.7 +/- 2.3 mm, and the mean amount of postsurgical relapse was 1.3 +/- 2.0 mm, representing a 14% relapse of the original surgical advancement. However, individual variation in the amount and direction of movement of the mandible was found during the follow-up period. Postsurgical relapse was found to be related to the amount of surgical advancement. Linear-regression analysis between these two variables resulted in an R2 value of 0.448. Fourteen of the subjects relapsed in the posterior direction, with 2 relapsing more than 50% of the surgical advancement. Five of the subjects moved further anteriorly, with 1 advancing as much as 50% more than the original advancement. The findings of this study suggest that mandibular advancement with the sagittal ramus osteotomy and rigid fixation does not provide consistently stable postsurgical results. However, when compared with previously reported relapse studies using nonrigid fixation techniques, rigid fixation yielded superior results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341939     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80471-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Stability of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison between positioning screws and plate.

Authors:  Nasser Nooh
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-10-29

Review 2.  The value of long-term follow-up of mandibular advancement surgery in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle.

Authors:  J P Bouwman; D B Tuinzing; P J Kostense; R A van Teeseling; H Mokhtari
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-11

3.  Evaluation of relapse after orthodontic therapy combined with orthognathic surgery in the treatment of skeletal class III.

Authors:  Inken Friederike de Haan; Robert Ciesielski; Tobias Nitsche; Bernd Koos
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients.

Authors:  Adebimpe O Ibitayo; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement: is it influenced by the magnitude of advancement or changes of the mandibular plane angle?

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Mahsa Nili; Ehsan Aliabadi; Fereydoun Pourdanesh
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-28

6.  Comparative Study of Skeletal Stability between Postoperative Skeletal Intermaxillary Fixation and No Skeletal Fixation after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: an 18 Months Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jens Hartlev; Erik Godtfredsen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Thomas Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 7.  The role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO): A systematic review.

Authors:  Maxim Van den Bempt; Shankeeth Vinayahalingam; Michael D Han; Stefaan J Bergé; Tong Xi
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.563

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.