OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of cediranib, a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study used a Simon two-stage trial design, which required at least two of 12 patients in the first cohort to be progression-free at 6 months. We enrolled a total of 35 evaluable patients who all receivedcediranib 20 mg orally daily. In a second cohort, 23 additional patients received prednisone 10 mg daily with cediranib. Endpoints included tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), vascular permeability via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and toxicity. RESULTS:A total of 59 patients were enrolled, of whom 67% had received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Six of 39 patients with measurable disease had confirmed partial responses and one had an unconfirmed partial response. At 6 months, 43.9% of patients were progression-free; the median PFS and OS periods for all patients were 3.7 months and 10.1 months, respectively. We found that the DCE-MRI variables baseline transport constant (Ktrans ) and rate constant at day 28 were significantly associated with PFS in univariate analyses, but only baseline Ktrans remained significant when considered jointly. The most frequent toxicities were hypertension, fatigue, anorexia and weight loss; the addition of prednisone reduced the incidence of constitutional toxicities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that cediranib was generally well tolerated with some anti-tumour activity in highly pretreated patients with metastatic CRPC who had progressive disease after docetaxel-based therapy. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of cediranib, a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study used a Simon two-stage trial design, which required at least two of 12 patients in the first cohort to be progression-free at 6 months. We enrolled a total of 35 evaluable patients who all received cediranib 20 mg orally daily. In a second cohort, 23 additional patients received prednisone 10 mg daily with cediranib. Endpoints included tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), vascular permeability via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were enrolled, of whom 67% had received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Six of 39 patients with measurable disease had confirmed partial responses and one had an unconfirmed partial response. At 6 months, 43.9% of patients were progression-free; the median PFS and OS periods for all patients were 3.7 months and 10.1 months, respectively. We found that the DCE-MRI variables baseline transport constant (Ktrans ) and rate constant at day 28 were significantly associated with PFS in univariate analyses, but only baseline Ktrans remained significant when considered jointly. The most frequent toxicities were hypertension, fatigue, anorexia and weight loss; the addition of prednisone reduced the incidence of constitutional toxicities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that cediranib was generally well tolerated with some anti-tumour activity in highly pretreated patients with metastatic CRPC who had progressive disease after docetaxel-based therapy. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: I F Tannock; D Osoba; M R Stockler; D S Ernst; A J Neville; M J Moore; G R Armitage; J J Wilson; P M Venner; C M Coppin; K C Murphy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gordon R Macpherson; Sylvia S W Ng; Nehal J Lakhani; Douglas K Price; Jurgen Venitz; William D Figg Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2002 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: F A Ferrer; L J Miller; R I Andrawis; S H Kurtzman; P C Albertsen; V P Laudone; D L Kreutzer Journal: J Urol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: William Kevin Kelly; Susan Halabi; Michael Carducci; Daniel George; John F Mahoney; Walter M Stadler; Michael Morris; Philip Kantoff; J Paul Monk; Ellen Kaplan; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen R Wedge; Jane Kendrew; Laurent F Hennequin; Paula J Valentine; Simon T Barry; Sandra R Brave; Neil R Smith; Neil H James; Michael Dukes; Jon O Curwen; Rosemary Chester; Janet A Jackson; Sarah J Boffey; Lyndsey L Kilburn; Sharon Barnett; Graham H P Richmond; Peter F Wadsworth; Mike Walker; Alison L Bigley; Sian T Taylor; Lee Cooper; Sarah Beck; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Donald J Ogilvie Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anna Spreafico; Kim N Chi; Srikala S Sridhar; David C Smith; Michael A Carducci; Peter Kavsak; Tracy S Wong; Lisa Wang; S Percy Ivy; Som Dave Mukherjee; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Mahadeo A Sukhai; Naoko Takebe; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Lillian L Siu; Sebastien J Hotte Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.266