OBJECTIVES: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a cytokine that plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis. VEGF is overexpressed in many human cancers, including prostate cancer, but circulating levels of VEGF in patients with prostate cancer have not been reported. In this study, we analyzed plasma concentrations of VEGF in a cohort of patients with prostate cancer and compared them with a normal population. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy, cancer-free individuals and 80 patients with prostate cancer (54 patients with localized prostate cancer and 26 patients with metastatic prostate cancer [bone or lymph node positive]) were analyzed in this study. Blood was drawn in the same fashion from all individuals and deposited in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as anticoagulant. Plasma was extracted and VEGF concentrations were determined using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. RESULTS: Median plasma VEGF was 28.5 pg/mL (interquartile range 19.3 to 57.0) in patients with metastases; 7.0 pg/mL (interquartile range 0 to 26.5) in patients with localized disease, and 0 pg/mL (interquartile range 0 to 24) in controls. These differences were statistically significant (P <0.001). When compared group by group, the metastatic group had significantly higher plasma VEGF than the localized disease group and the control group (P = 0.003 and P <0.001, respectively). There was a tendency for plasma VEGF to be higher in the localized disease group than in the control group, a trend that almost reached statistical significance (P = 0.038). Using a cutoff of 18 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of the test in differentiating between patients with and without metastatic disease was 81% and 71%, respectively. The odds of metastatic disease were almost 10 times greater for patients with VEGF values greater than 18 pg/mL than for those with values less than 18 pg/mL. There was no correlation between age and plasma VEGF values or between plasma VEGF and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, patients with serum PSA greater than 20 ng/mL had significantly higher plasma VEGF values than patients with serum PSA less than 20 ng/mL (P <0.001). No direct relation was found between Gleason sum and plasma VEGF, although VEGF levels were higher in patients with Gleason sums of 8 to 10 than in patients with lower Gleason sums. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that patients with metastatic prostate cancer have higher plasma VEGF levels than patients with localized disease or healthy controls. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm the predictive utility of VEGF.
OBJECTIVES:Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a cytokine that plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis. VEGF is overexpressed in many humancancers, including prostate cancer, but circulating levels of VEGF in patients with prostate cancer have not been reported. In this study, we analyzed plasma concentrations of VEGF in a cohort of patients with prostate cancer and compared them with a normal population. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy, cancer-free individuals and 80 patients with prostate cancer (54 patients with localized prostate cancer and 26 patients with metastatic prostate cancer [bone or lymph node positive]) were analyzed in this study. Blood was drawn in the same fashion from all individuals and deposited in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as anticoagulant. Plasma was extracted and VEGF concentrations were determined using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. RESULTS: Median plasma VEGF was 28.5 pg/mL (interquartile range 19.3 to 57.0) in patients with metastases; 7.0 pg/mL (interquartile range 0 to 26.5) in patients with localized disease, and 0 pg/mL (interquartile range 0 to 24) in controls. These differences were statistically significant (P <0.001). When compared group by group, the metastatic group had significantly higher plasma VEGF than the localized disease group and the control group (P = 0.003 and P <0.001, respectively). There was a tendency for plasma VEGF to be higher in the localized disease group than in the control group, a trend that almost reached statistical significance (P = 0.038). Using a cutoff of 18 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of the test in differentiating between patients with and without metastatic disease was 81% and 71%, respectively. The odds of metastatic disease were almost 10 times greater for patients with VEGF values greater than 18 pg/mL than for those with values less than 18 pg/mL. There was no correlation between age and plasma VEGF values or between plasma VEGF and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, patients with serum PSA greater than 20 ng/mL had significantly higher plasma VEGF values than patients with serum PSA less than 20 ng/mL (P <0.001). No direct relation was found between Gleason sum and plasma VEGF, although VEGF levels were higher in patients with Gleason sums of 8 to 10 than in patients with lower Gleason sums. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that patients with metastatic prostate cancer have higher plasma VEGF levels than patients with localized disease or healthy controls. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm the predictive utility of VEGF.
Authors: Philip J Saylor; Kevin R Kozak; Matthew R Smith; Marek A Ancukiewicz; Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony L Zietman; Rakesh K Jain; Dan G Duda Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-02-02
Authors: Pedro C Barata; Matthew Cooney; Prateek Mendiratta; Ruby Gupta; Robert Dreicer; Jorge A Garcia Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Pei Yang; Weiye Deng; Yaqian Han; Yingrui Shi; Ting Xu; Juan Shi; Hesham Elhalawani; Yu Zhao; Xiaoxue Xie; Fan Lou; Rong Zhang; Hekun Jin Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Markus Letsch; Andrew V Schally; Rebeca Busto; Ana M Bajo; Jozsef L Varga Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-01-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sunil Parimi; Misha Eliasziw; Scott North; Marc Trudeau; Eric Winquist; Kim N Chi; Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Bernhard J Eigl Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 3.850