Literature DB >> 23418635

On the necessity of full length electrical cochlear stimulation to suppress severe tinnitus in single-sided deafness.

Andrea Kleine Punte1, Dirk De Ridder, Paul Van de Heyning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation (CI) has proven in long term prospective trials to reduce significantly incapacitating tinnitus in single sided deafness (SSD). Discussion arises whether electrical stimulation near the round window (RW) is also able to reduce tinnitus. AIM: to assess whether electrical stimulation of the basal first 4 intracochlear electrodes of a CI could sufficiently reduce tinnitus and to compare these results with stimulation with all CI electrodes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 7 patients who met the criteria of severe tinnitus due to SSD were implanted with a Med-El Sonata Ti100 with a FlexSoftTM or Flex24TM electrode. After 4 weeks only the basal electrode pair (E12) nearest to the RW was activated. Each week the following pair was activated until the 4th pair.Thereafter all electrodes were activated. Tinnitus was assessed before CI surgery and before each electrode pair was activated. When all electrodes were fitted, evaluation was done after 1, 3 and 6 months.Tinnitus was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for loudness, psychoacoustic tinnitus loudness comparison at 1 kHz and Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) for the effect on quality of life. To evaluate the natural evolution, a tightly matched control group with severe tinnitus due to SSD was followed prospectively.
RESULTS: All the tinnitus outcome measures remained unchanged with 1, 2, 3 or 4 activated electrode pairs. With complete CI activation, the tinnitus decreased significantly comparable with earlier reports.Pre-implantation the tinnitus loudness was 8.2/10 on the VAS and was reduced to 4.1/10 6 months postimplantation.Psychometrically the loudness level went from 21.7 dB SL (SD: 16.02) to 7.5 dB SL (SD: 5.24)and the TQ from 60/84 to 39/84. The non-implanted group had no decrease of the tinnitus, the average VAS remained stable at 8.9/10 throughout the follow-up period of 6 months.
CONCLUSION: with the current stimulation parameters electrical stimulation in the first 8e10 mm of the basal part of the scala tympani is insufficient to reduce tinnitus. However, stimulation over the complete CI length yields immediate tinnitus reduction confirming earlier results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23418635     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  A Series of Case Studies of Tinnitus Suppression With Mixed Background Stimuli in a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; A J Keiner; Kurt Walker; Aniruddha K Deshpande; Shelley Witt; Matthijs Killian; Helena Ji; Jim Patrick; Norbert Dillier; Pim van Dijk; Wai Kong Lai; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 2.  A multidisciplinary systematic review of the treatment for chronic idiopathic tinnitus.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Zenner; Wolfgang Delb; Birgit Kröner-Herwig; Burkhard Jäger; Ingrid Peroz; Gerhard Hesse; Birgit Mazurek; Gerhard Goebel; Christian Gerloff; Regina Trollmann; Eberhard Biesinger; Harald Seidler; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Tinnitus treatment with precise and optimal electric stimulation: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Hamid Djalilian; Harrison Lin
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 4.  S3 Guideline: Chronic Tinnitus : German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery e. V. (DGHNO-KHC).

Authors:  Birgit Mazurek; Gerhard Hesse; Heribert Sattel; Volker Kratzsch; Claas Lahmann; Christian Dobel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 1.330

5.  Non-penetrating round window electrode stimulation for tinnitus therapy followed by cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gentiana I Wenzel; Petra Sarnes; Athanasia Warnecke; Timo Stöver; Burkard Jäger; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Pim van Dijk; Holger Schulze; Birgit Mazurek; Patrick Krauss; Verena Scheper; Athanasia Warnecke; Winfried Schlee; Kerstin Schwabe; Wibke Singer; Christoph Braun; Paul H Delano; Andreas J Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Grant D Searchfield; Matthias H J Munk; David M Baguley; Lukas Rüttiger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Suppression and facilitation of auditory neurons through coordinated acoustic and midbrain stimulation: investigating a deep brain stimulator for tinnitus.

Authors:  Sarah J Offutt; Kellie J Ryan; Alexander E Konop; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Changes in Tinnitus by Cochlear Implantation: A Parametric Study of the Effect of Single-Electrode Stimulation.

Authors:  Francka J J Kloostra; Emile de Kleine; Rolien H Free; Rutger Hofman; Pim Van Dijk
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with bilateral hearing loss: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kelly Assouly; Adriana L Smit; Inge Stegeman; Koenraad S Rhebergen; Bas van Dijk; Robert Stokroos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.