| Literature DB >> 23418154 |
M E Holmstrup1, T J Fairchild, S Keslacy, R S Weinstock, J A Kanaley.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the hormonal and subjective appetite responses to exercise (1-h continuous versus intermittent exercise throughout the day) in obese individuals. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven obese subjects (>30 kg/m(2) ) underwent three 12-h study days: control condition [sedentary behavior (SED)], continuous exercise condition [(EX) 1-h exercise], and intermittent exercise condition [(INT) 12 hourly, 5-min bouts]. Blood samples (every 10 min) were measured for serum insulin and total peptide YY (PYY) concentrations, with ratings of appetite (visual analog scale [VAS): every 20 min]. Both total area under the curve (AUC), and subjective appetite ratings were calculated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23418154 PMCID: PMC3661741 DOI: 10.1002/oby.20335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) ISSN: 1930-7381 Impact factor: 5.002
Subject Characteristics
| Female (n=3) | Male (n=8) | Total (n=11) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 25±3.1 | 25.3±1.5 | 25.2±1.3 |
| Height (cm) | 170±0.5 | 176.0±2.7 | 174.4±2.1 |
| Weight (kg) | 103.6±10.2 | 104.5±4.7 | 104.3±4.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 35.8±3.3 | 33.8±1.4 | 34.3±1.3 |
| Body Fat % | 42.0±3.3 | 28.9±2.7 | 32.5±2.8 |
| Physical Inactivity (self-report hours per day) | 19.7±1.6 | 16.9±0.9 | 17.6±0.8 |
| Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dl) | 91.3±4.7 | 84.8±2.2 | 86.5±2.1 |
| 2h OGTT Glucose (mg/dl) | 112.7±8.1 | 103.6±5.9 | 106.1±4.8 |
| Resting Systolic BP (mmHg) | 125.3±7.7 | 120.8±3.1 | 122.0±2.9 |
| Resting diastolic BP (mmHg) | 68.3±3.8 | 65.9±1.8 | 66.5±1.6 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 181±2.4 | 127.3±2.6 | 145.2±8.6 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 91.5±10.2 | 51.3±5.7 | 64.7±7.7 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 57.5±8.6 | 38.8±4.3 | 45±4.5 |
| Cholesterol Ratio (TC/HDL) | 3.3±0.4 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.41±0.4 |
Mean±SEM.
P<0.05 vs. female subjects.
Figure 1Total PYY pattern of response over 12 h for the three study conditions. No significant differences across condition (P>0.05). ⇩- meal ingestion.
Change in Total PYY, Insulin, and Satiety per Meala
| Time of Day (h) | 0700–0900 | 0900–1100 | 1100–1300 | 1300–1500 | 1500–1700 | 1700–1900 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYY (pg/ml)- SED | 17.7 | 11.4 | 0.3 | 6.2 | 5.4 | 11.7 |
| EX | 22.4 | −2.7 | 5.5 | 7.3 | 5.0 | 10.2 |
| INT | 16.4 | 13.0 | 5.3 | 10.4 | 14.8 | −6.7 |
| Insulin (pg/ml)- SED | 804.5 | 581.3 | 624.8 | 593.6 | 561.1 | 740.9 |
| EX | 207.3 | 584.3 | 477.3 | 418.6 | 484.4 | 600.7 |
| INT | 513.8 | 539.0 | 430.8 | 494.8 | 479.0 | 441.1 |
| VAS Satiety (mm)- SED | 9.2 | 3.2 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 11.3 | 15.3 |
| EX | 1.0 | −8.7 | −10.6 | −8.3 | −5.1 | −7.7 |
| INT | 9.0 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 12.1 | 8.4 |
Mean
P<0.05 vs. SED condition.
Calculated as 2h - baseline value for each meal condition. EX-exercise, INT-intermittent exercise
Figure 2a) Hunger pattern of response over 12 h for the three study conditions. No significant differences by condition (P>0.05). ⇩- meal ingestion. - exercise condition; 1-hour walking bout. ▯- intermittent exercise condition; hourly 5-minute walking bouts. b) 2 h tAUC for hunger VAS scores. *Significantly different from EX condition (P<0.05). †Significantly different from SED condition (P<0.05).
Figure 3a) Satiety pattern of response over 12h for the three study conditions. No significant differences by condition (P>0.05). ⇩- meal ingestion. - exercise condition; 1-hour walking bout. ▯- intermittent exercise condition; hourly 5-minute walking bouts. b) 2 h tAUC for satiety VAS scores. *Significantly different from SED and INT conditions (P<0.05).