Literature DB >> 23418030

In vivo precision of the GE iDXA for the assessment of total body composition and fat distribution in severely obese patients.

Tamara E Carver1, Nicholas V Christou, Ross E Andersen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the precision of the iDXA for total body composition and fat distribution measurements in severely obese patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-five severely obese participants with a mean age of 46 ± 11 years, BMI of 49 ± 6 kg/m(2) , and a mean body mass of 137.3 ± 20.9 kg took part in this investigation. Two consecutive iDXA scans with repositioning of the total body were conducted for each participant. The coefficient of variation (CV), the root-mean-square (RMS) averages of standard deviations of repeated measurements, the corresponding 95% least significant change, and Intraclass Correlations (ICC) were calculated.
RESULTS: Precision expressed as % CV, for total body bone mineral content, fat free mass, total body fat, total body lean, and % total body fat were 1.08%, 0.94%, 0.90%, 1.00%, 0.79%, respectively. Precision was 1.44% for gynoid fat distribution and 1.64% for android fat (AF) distribution. The ICCs in all DXA measurements were 0.99 with % AF having the lowest at 0.96.
CONCLUSIONS: The GE Lunar iDXA™ demonstrated excellent precision for total body composition assessments and is the first study to assess reproducibility in severely obese individuals.
Copyright © 2013 The Obesity Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23418030     DOI: 10.1002/oby.20323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  8 in total

1.  Precision of total and regional body fat estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer measurements.

Authors:  L A Kaminsky; C Ozemek; K L Williams; W Byun
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Practical Considerations for Body Composition Assessment of Adults with Class II/III Obesity Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis or Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Carlene A Johnson Stoklossa; Mary Forhan; Raj S Padwal; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Carla M Prado
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-12

3.  Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers for Assessing Total and Regional Body Composition.

Authors:  Shannon A Morrison; Robert M Petri; Heather L Hunter; Dheeraj Raju; Barbara Gower
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Reliability of Compartmental Body Composition Measures in Weight-Stable Adults Using GE iDXA: Implications for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Aimee L Dordevic; Maxine Bonham; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Alison Evans; Elizabeth Barber; Kaitlin Day; Alastair Kwok; Helen Truby
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Identification of significant obstructive sleep apnoea in the obese patient: development of the novel DX-OSA score.

Authors:  Daniela D Godoroja; Dan Adrian Cioc
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2016-10

6.  Alterations in energy balance from an exercise intervention with ad libitum food intake.

Authors:  Katarina Melzer; Anne Renaud; Stefanie Zurbuchen; Céline Tschopp; Jan Lehmann; Davide Malatesta; Nicole Ruch; Yves Schutz; Bengt Kayser; Urs Mäder
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2016-03-09

7.  Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard.

Authors:  Fanny Buckinx; Francesco Landi; Matteo Cesari; Roger A Fielding; Marjolein Visser; Klaus Engelke; Stefania Maggi; Elaine Dennison; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Sophie Allepaerts; Jurgen Bauer; Ivan Bautmans; Maria Luisa Brandi; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Francesca Cerreta; Antonio Cherubini; Cyrus Cooper; Alphonso Cruz-Jentoft; Eugene McCloskey; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andrea Laslop; Jean Petermans; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Sian Robinson; Yves Rolland; Ricardo Rueda; Bruno Vellas; John A Kanis
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 12.910

8.  Comment on: "Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard" by Buckinx et al.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; Dallin Tavoian; Bret H Goodpaster; Peggy M Cawthon; Ross D Hansen; Todd M Manini
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 12.910

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.