PURPOSE: To analyze neurovascular coupling in the retina of untreated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maximal vessel dilation in response to flicker light was analyzed with Retinal Vessel Analyzer (RVA) in temporal superior/inferior arterioles and veins in 51 POAG patients, 46 OHT and 59 control subjects. RVA parameters were compared between groups, between contralateral POAG eyes, and correlated to intraocular pressure, visual field mean defect and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. RESULTS: POAG eyes demonstrated generally smaller response of all vessels to flicker light than the other two groups (ANOVA p=0.026; mean arterial flicker response in percent of baseline, averaged superior and inferior was 3.48 ± 2.22 % for controls , 2.35 ± 2.06 % for POAG patients , and 2.97 ± 2.35 % for OHT patients; corresponding values for venules were 3.88 ± 1.98 %, 2.89 ± 1.72 %, 3.45 ± 2.77 %). There was no difference in flicker response between the eye with more and less advanced damage in each patient of the POAG group (ANOVA p=0.79). Correlation of flicker response to intraocular pressure (IOP) was borderline at best, correlations to the level of glaucomatous damage were not significant. Correlation of flicker response of superior and inferior vessels of the same eye was significant for the arteries (Pearson r=0.23, p=0.004), as well as venules (r=0.52, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: General vessel response to flicker light was decreased in POAG patients, compared to normal controls and OHT patients. In contrast to significant correlation between the two contralateral eyes of the flicker response itself, only its borderline correlation to IOP was seen. There was no correlation to the level of damage, altogether indicating a systemic dysregulation phenomenon. GRANTS: Swiss National Foundation Grant 3200B0-113685, Velux Stiftung Grant, Freie Akademische Gesellschaft (FAG) Grant, Pfizer Inc. Grant CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION REFERENCE NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00430209.
PURPOSE: To analyze neurovascular coupling in the retina of untreated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maximal vessel dilation in response to flicker light was analyzed with Retinal Vessel Analyzer (RVA) in temporal superior/inferior arterioles and veins in 51 POAG patients, 46 OHT and 59 control subjects. RVA parameters were compared between groups, between contralateral POAG eyes, and correlated to intraocular pressure, visual field mean defect and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. RESULTS: POAG eyes demonstrated generally smaller response of all vessels to flicker light than the other two groups (ANOVA p=0.026; mean arterial flicker response in percent of baseline, averaged superior and inferior was 3.48 ± 2.22 % for controls , 2.35 ± 2.06 % for POAG patients , and 2.97 ± 2.35 % for OHT patients; corresponding values for venules were 3.88 ± 1.98 %, 2.89 ± 1.72 %, 3.45 ± 2.77 %). There was no difference in flicker response between the eye with more and less advanced damage in each patient of the POAG group (ANOVA p=0.79). Correlation of flicker response to intraocular pressure (IOP) was borderline at best, correlations to the level of glaucomatous damage were not significant. Correlation of flicker response of superior and inferior vessels of the same eye was significant for the arteries (Pearson r=0.23, p=0.004), as well as venules (r=0.52, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: General vessel response to flicker light was decreased in POAG patients, compared to normal controls and OHT patients. In contrast to significant correlation between the two contralateral eyes of the flicker response itself, only its borderline correlation to IOP was seen. There was no correlation to the level of damage, altogether indicating a systemic dysregulation phenomenon. GRANTS: Swiss National Foundation Grant 3200B0-113685, Velux Stiftung Grant, Freie Akademische Gesellschaft (FAG) Grant, Pfizer Inc. Grant CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION REFERENCE NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00430209.
Authors: Z Cohen; I Bouchelet; A Olivier; J G Villemure; R Ball; D B Stanimirovic; E Hamel Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Konstantin Gugleta; Anna Polunina; Asan Kochkorov; Nicolas Waldmann; Natalie Portmann; Robert Katamay; Josef Flammer; Selim Orgul Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Gerhard Garhofer; Toke Bek; Andreas G Boehm; Doina Gherghel; Juan Grunwald; Peter Jeppesen; Hélène Kergoat; Konstantin Kotliar; Ines Lanzl; John V Lovasik; Edgar Nagel; Walthard Vilser; Selim Orgul; Leopold Schmetterer Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Guido T Dorner; Gerhard Garhofer; Barbara Kiss; Elzbieta Polska; Kaija Polak; Charles E Riva; Leopold Schmetterer Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Gala Beykin; Anthony M Norcia; Vivek J Srinivasan; Alfredo Dubra; Jeffrey L Goldberg Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 21.198