PURPOSE: To examine gender-specific differences in benign renal tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study included 135 adult Caucasian patients with 143 benign renal tumors, which were treated surgically at a single institution. Demographics, comorbidity, histology, renal function, and management were compared by gender. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature were performed. RESULTS: A total of 73 women were compared with 62 men. The female-to-male ratio was significantly higher in patients with benign renal tumors than in those with renal cell carcinoma (1.18:1 vs. 0.57:1, p < 0.001). Only 17 % of benign renal tumors were correctly classified by preoperative computed tomography. The most frequently observed histological types were oncocytoma (44 %) and angiomyolipoma (37 %). Angiomyolipoma occurred more than twice as often in women than in men (72 vs. 28 %), while oncocytoma was more frequently found in men (59 vs. 41 %, p = 0.001). Men with benign renal tumors were older (p = 0.002) and had higher body mass indices (p = 0.019), higher comorbidity indices (p < 0.001), lower ECOG performance status (p < 0.001), and smaller tumors (p = 0.045). No differences were seen in pack years, mode of diagnosis, bilaterality, renal function, use of laparoscopic surgery, and the rate of radical nephrectomy. In the meta-analysis of 9,665 renal tumors, women had a 2.55-fold increased chance of benign pathology and a greater chance of angiomyolipoma (OR 4.66) than men. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated several gender-specific differences in benign renal tumors, especially in the histological types. Despite this, clinical-pathological features and management of benign renal tumors in men and women appear more alike than different.
PURPOSE: To examine gender-specific differences in benign renal tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study included 135 adult Caucasian patients with 143 benign renal tumors, which were treated surgically at a single institution. Demographics, comorbidity, histology, renal function, and management were compared by gender. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature were performed. RESULTS: A total of 73 women were compared with 62 men. The female-to-male ratio was significantly higher in patients with benign renal tumors than in those with renal cell carcinoma (1.18:1 vs. 0.57:1, p < 0.001). Only 17 % of benign renal tumors were correctly classified by preoperative computed tomography. The most frequently observed histological types were oncocytoma (44 %) and angiomyolipoma (37 %). Angiomyolipoma occurred more than twice as often in women than in men (72 vs. 28 %), while oncocytoma was more frequently found in men (59 vs. 41 %, p = 0.001). Men with benign renal tumors were older (p = 0.002) and had higher body mass indices (p = 0.019), higher comorbidity indices (p < 0.001), lower ECOG performance status (p < 0.001), and smaller tumors (p = 0.045). No differences were seen in pack years, mode of diagnosis, bilaterality, renal function, use of laparoscopic surgery, and the rate of radical nephrectomy. In the meta-analysis of 9,665 renal tumors, women had a 2.55-fold increased chance of benign pathology and a greater chance of angiomyolipoma (OR 4.66) than men. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated several gender-specific differences in benign renal tumors, especially in the histological types. Despite this, clinical-pathological features and management of benign renal tumors in men and women appear more alike than different.
Authors: Alexander Kutikov; Marc C Smaldone; Brian L Egleston; Brandon J Manley; Daniel J Canter; Jay Simhan; Stephen A Boorjian; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alessandro Volpe; Antonio Finelli; Inderbir S Gill; Michael A S Jewett; Guido Martignoni; Thomas J Polascik; Mesut Remzi; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Bruce R Kava; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Murugesan Manoharan; Mohamed Aziz; Vincent G Bird; Devendar Katkoori; Rajan Ramanathan; Merce Jorda; Gaetano Ciancio; Mark S Soloway; Raymond J Leveillee Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Leo Romis; Luca Cindolo; Jean Jacques Patard; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo Altieri; Laurent Salomon; Claude Clement Abbou; Dominique Chopin; Bernard Lobel; Alexandre de La Taille Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jeffrey K Mullins; Jihad H Kaouk; Sam Bhayani; Craig G Rogers; Michael D Stifelman; Phillip M Pierorazio; Youssef S Tanagho; Shahab P Hillyer; Bartosz F Kaczmarek; Yichun Chiu; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Seo Yong Park; Seong Soo Jeon; Seo Yeon Lee; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 2.153