Literature DB >> 23416446

Invited commentary: reproductive organ surgeries and breast cancer risk--apples, oranges, or fruit cocktail?

David J Press1, Leslie Bernstein.   

Abstract

Case-control and cohort studies are almost always complicated by nonrandom exposure allocation, which must be minimized in the design and analysis phases. Tubal sterilization is a common gynecological procedure that may be associated with other reproductive organ surgeries, which in turn may be associated with breast cancer risk. In this issue of the Journal, Gaudet et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(6):492-499) argue successfully that tubal sterilization is unassociated with breast cancer risk. Scrutiny of the heterogeneous studies included in their meta-analysis underscores the role of confounding and effect modification in observational epidemiologic studies. Specifically, tubal sterilization is unassociated with breast cancer risk, but either oophorectomy or hysterectomy, or both, and the timing of these procedures warrant careful consideration in the design, analysis, and interpretation of observational research on reproductive factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23416446      PMCID: PMC3657528          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  28 in total

1.  Reproductive surgery, menopause and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C La Vecchia
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  A study of the epidemiology of cancer of the breast. II. The influence of hysterectomy.

Authors:  T HIRAYAMA; E L WYNDER
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1962 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Hysterectomy, tubal sterilization, and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K L Irwin; N C Lee; H B Peterson; G L Rubin; P A Wingo; M G Mandel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  Female sterilisation in the United States.

Authors:  Nikki Zite; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Tubal sterilization and breast cancer incidence: results from the cancer prevention study II nutrition cohort and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Alpa V Patel; Juzhong Sun; Lauren R Teras; Susan M Gapstur
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Trends in bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease.

Authors:  Akiva P Novetsky; Leslie R Boyd; John P Curtin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: national data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilization.

Authors:  John E Anderson; Denise J Jamieson; Lee Warner; Dmitry M Kissin; Ajay K Nangia; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Eric J Jacobs; M Lyn Almon; Ann Chao; Marjorie L McCullough; Heather S Feigelson; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Bilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery?

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Kala Visvanathan; Polly A Newcomb; John M Hampton; Kathleen M Egan; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Brian Morrow; Michelle N Podgornik; Kate M Brett; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.