Literature DB >> 23416445

Tubal sterilization and breast cancer incidence: results from the cancer prevention study II nutrition cohort and meta-analysis.

Mia M Gaudet1, Alpa V Patel, Juzhong Sun, Lauren R Teras, Susan M Gapstur.   

Abstract

Tubal sterilization is a common form of contraception in the United States and is hypothesized to be associated with a lower risk of breast cancer. However, prior observational studies have reported inconsistent results. We investigated the association between tubal sterilization and breast cancer risk among 77,249 postmenopausal, cancer-free women in the Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II) Nutrition Cohort, enrolled in 21 states in the United States during 1992-1993. During 15 years of follow-up through June 30, 2007, 4,084 invasive breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A meta-analysis including the CPS-II Nutrition Cohort results with other published results from 4 case-control studies and 3 prospective studies was conducted to provide a summary estimate for the association between tubal sterilization and breast cancer risk. In the CPS-II Nutrition Cohort, tubal sterilization was not associated with breast cancer incidence (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 0.97, 1.20). Associations stratified by year of tubal sterilization, age, and time since surgery were also null. The meta-analysis also found no association between tubal sterilization and breast cancer risk (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.84, 1.09). Tubal sterilization does not appear to be associated with breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23416445     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  5 in total

1.  Invited commentary: reproductive organ surgeries and breast cancer risk--apples, oranges, or fruit cocktail?

Authors:  David J Press; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on tubal ligation and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Nazila Najdi; Arezoo Esmailzadeh; Maryam Shokrpour; Somayeh Nikfar; Seyedeh Zahra Razavi; Mahdi Sepidarkish; Saman Maroufizadeh; Saeid Safiri; Amir Almasi-Hashiani
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-19

3.  Tubal ligation in relation to menopausal symptoms and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  H B Nichols; D D Baird; L A DeRoo; G E Kissling; D P Sandler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Tubal ligation and incidence of 26 site-specific cancers in the Million Women Study.

Authors:  Kezia Gaitskell; Kate Coffey; Jane Green; Kirstin Pirie; Gillian K Reeves; Ahmed A Ahmed; Isobel Barnes; Valerie Beral
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Recent developments have made female permanent contraception an increasingly attractive option, and pregnant women in particular ought to be counselled about it.

Authors:  Douwe A A Verkuyl
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-12-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.