Literature DB >> 23416219

A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of a model of restorative home care on physical function and social support among older people.

John Geoffrey Morgan Parsons1, Nicolette Sheridan, Paul Rouse, Elizabeth Robinson, Martin Connolly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a restorative model of home care on social support and physical function among community-dwelling older people.
DESIGN: Cluster-randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Home care in an urban area. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=205) were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=108; mean age, 79.1y; 71.3% women; 81.5% New Zealand European [NZE]; 50.8% residing in areas of the highest levels of social deprivation) or a usual care group (n=97; mean age, 76.9y; 60.8% women; 73.2% NZE; 53.5% in the highest levels of social deprivation). INTERVENTION: Participants randomly assigned to the intervention group completed a goal facilitation tool with a needs assessor to determine their needs and to establish the aims for the episode of care. Services were structured according to the principles of restorative home care (independence focused with individually tailored activity programs). Usual care participants received a standard needs assessment that informed the delivery of home care services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Dukes Social Support Index (DSSI).
RESULTS: There was greater change over time in physical function (measured by SPPB: F=8.30, P=.003) but no associated increase in social support (as determined by DSSI: F=2.58, P=.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in physical function were observed after a period of restorative home care services. The absence of an associated change in social support may have been the result of a combination of factors, including the threshold of physical function required for community ambulation, the low rate of allied health service provision, and the time required to reestablish social ties. The findings contribute to a greater understanding of factors necessary to refocus home-based services to emphasize improvements in physical function and independence.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23416219     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  15 in total

Review 1.  Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults.

Authors:  Andy Cochrane; Mairead Furlong; Sinead McGilloway; David W Molloy; Michael Stevenson; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-11

2.  Study protocol for a multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway.

Authors:  Eva Langeland; Eva Langland; Hanne Tuntland; Oddvar Førland; Eline Aas; Bjarte Folkestad; Frode F Jacobsen; Ingvild Kjeken
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Reablement in community-dwelling adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hanne Tuntland; Birgitte Espehaug; Oddvar Forland; Astri Drange Hole; Egil Kjerstad; Ingvild Kjeken
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Egil Kjerstad; Hanne Kristin Tuntland
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Reablement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Annie Tessier; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Carrie Anna Mcginn; Renée Latulippe
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-05

6.  Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care.

Authors:  Lee-Fay Low; Shruti Venkatesh; Lindy Clemson; Dafna Merom; Anne-Nicole Casey; Henry Brodaty
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Does rehabilitation setting influence risk of institutionalization? A register-based study of hip fracture patients in Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  Rina Moe Fosse; Eliva Atieno Ambugo; Tron Anders Moger; Terje P Hagen; Trond Tjerbo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hanne Tuntland; Mona Kristin Aaslund; Birgitte Espehaug; Oddvar Førland; Ingvild Kjeken
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  The Home Independence Program with non-health professionals as care managers: an evaluation.

Authors:  Gill Lewin; Karyn Concanen; David Youens
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  A multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway: a clinical controlled trial.

Authors:  E Langeland; H Tuntland; B Folkestad; O Førland; F F Jacobsen; I Kjeken
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.