Literature DB >> 23416180

Understanding decimal proportions: discrete representations, parallel access, and privileged processing of zero.

Sashank Varma1, Stacy R Karl.   

Abstract

Much of the research on mathematical cognition has focused on the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, with considerably less attention paid to more abstract number classes. The current research investigated how people understand decimal proportions--rational numbers between 0 and 1 expressed in the place-value symbol system. The results demonstrate that proportions are represented as discrete structures and processed in parallel. There was a semantic interference effect: When understanding a proportion expression (e.g., "0.29"), both the correct proportion referent (e.g., 0.29) and the incorrect natural number referent (e.g., 29) corresponding to the visually similar natural number expression (e.g., "29") are accessed in parallel, and when these referents lead to conflicting judgments, performance slows. There was also a syntactic interference effect, generalizing the unit-decade compatibility effect for natural numbers: When comparing two proportions, their tenths and hundredths components are processed in parallel, and when the different components lead to conflicting judgments, performance slows. The results also reveal that zero decimals--proportions ending in zero--serve multiple cognitive functions, including eliminating semantic interference and speeding processing. The current research also extends the distance, semantic congruence, and SNARC effects from natural numbers to decimal proportions. These findings inform how people understand the place-value symbol system, and the mental implementation of mathematical symbol systems more generally.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23416180     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic.

Authors:  J Mock; S Huber; E Klein; K Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-04

2.  No power: exponential expressions are not processed automatically as such.

Authors:  Ami Feder; Mariya Lozin; Michal Pinhas
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-23

3.  Length is not all that matters: testing the role of number identity and the ratio of fillers in comparisons of multi-digits with different digit length.

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; Ismael Gutiérrez-Cordero; Carlos Larios; Anikó Csilinkó; Juan Antonio Álvarez-Montesinos
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-18

4.  An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qi Wang; Chongde Lin; Cody Ding; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Decimal fraction representations are not distinct from natural number representations - evidence from a combined eye-tracking and computational modeling approach.

Authors:  Stefan Huber; Elise Klein; Klaus Willmes; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.