Literature DB >> 23415948

A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging.

Julie L Winterburn1, Jens C Pruessner, Sofia Chavez, Mark M Schira, Nancy J Lobaugh, Aristotle N Voineskos, M Mallar Chakravarty.   

Abstract

The hippocampus is a neuroanatomical structure that has been widely studied in the context of learning, memory, stress, and neurodegeneration. Neuroanatomically, the hippocampus is subdivided into several subfields with intricate morphologies and complex three-dimensional relationships. Recent studies have demonstrated that the identification of different subfields is possible with high-resolution and -contrast image volumes acquired using ex vivo specimens in a small bore 9.4 T scanner and, more recently, in vivo, at 7 T. In these studies, the neuroanatomical definitions of boundaries between subfields are based upon salient differences in image contrast. Typically, the definition of subfields has not been possible using commonly available magnetic resonance (MR) scanners (i.e.: 1.5 or 3T) due to resolution and contrast limitations. To overcome the limited availability of post-mortem specimens and expertise in state-of-the-art high-field imaging, we propose a coupling of MR acquisition and detailed segmentation techniques that allow for the reliable identification of hippocampal anatomy (including subfields). High-resolution and -contrast T1- and T2-weighted image volumes were acquired from 5 volunteers (2 male; 3 female; age range: 29-57, avg. 37) using a clinical research-grade 3T scanner and have final super-sampled isotropic voxel dimensions of 0.3mm. We demonstrate that by using these acquisition techniques, our data results in contrast-to-noise ratios that compare well with high-resolution images acquired with long scan times using post-mortem data at higher field strengths. For the subfields, the cornus ammonis (CA) 1, CA2/CA3, CA4/dentate gyrus, stratum radiatum/stratum lacunosum/stratum moleculare, and subiculum were all labeled as separate structures. Hippocampal volumes are reported for each of the substructures and the hippocampus as a whole (range for hippocampus: 2456.72-3325.02 mm(3)). Intra-rater reliability of our manual segmentation protocol demonstrates high reliability for the whole hippocampus (mean Dice Kappa of 0.91; range 0.90-0.92) and for each of the subfields (range of Dice Kappas: 0.64-0.83). We demonstrate that our reliability is better than the Dice Kappas produced by simulating the following errors: a translation by a single voxel in all cardinal directions and 1% volumetric shrinkage and expansion. The completed hippocampal atlases are available freely online (info2.camh.net/kf-tigr/index.php/Hippocampus) and can be coupled with novel computational neuroanatomy techniques that will allow for them to be customized to the unique neuroanatomy of different subjects, and ultimately be utilized in different analysis pipelines.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415948     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  104 in total

1.  In vivo MRI signatures of hippocampal subfield pathology in intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; Boris C Bernhardt; Diego Cantor-Rivera; Jonathan C Lau; Charlotte Blinston; Robert R Hammond; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Jorge G Burneo; Seyed M Mirsattari; David A Steven; Andrew G Parrent; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Rostral-Caudal Hippocampal Functional Convergence Is Reduced Across the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum.

Authors:  Joseph Therriault; S Wang; S Mathotaarachchi; Tharick A Pascoal; M Parent; T Beaudry; M Shin; Benedet Al; M S Kang; K P Ng; C Dansereau; M T M Park; V Fonov; F Carbonell; E Zimmer; M Mallar Chakravarty; P Bellec; S Gauthier; P Rosa-Neto
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Jean C Augustinack; Khoa Nguyen; Christopher M Player; Allison Player; Michelle Wright; Nicole Roy; Matthew P Frosch; Ann C McKee; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce Fischl; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Hippocampal substructural vulnerability to sleep disturbance and cognitive impairment in patients with chronic primary insomnia: magnetic resonance imaging morphometry.

Authors:  Eun Yeon Joo; Hosung Kim; Sooyeon Suh; Seung Bong Hong
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Differential associations of age with volume and microstructure of hippocampal subfields in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Florian U Fischer; Robin de Flores; Gaël Chételat; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Automated methods for hippocampus segmentation: the evolution and a review of the state of the art.

Authors:  Vanderson Dill; Alexandre Rosa Franco; Márcio Sarroglia Pinho
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-04

7.  Hippocampal (subfield) volume and shape in relation to cognitive performance across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Aristotle N Voineskos; Julie L Winterburn; Daniel Felsky; Jon Pipitone; Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; M Mallar Chakravarty
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Hippocampal alterations and functional correlates in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Kimberly Fontes; Charles V Rohlicek; Christine Saint-Martin; Guillaume Gilbert; Kaitlyn Easson; Annette Majnemer; Ariane Marelli; M Mallar Chakravarty; Marie Brossard-Racine
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  TSPO expression and brain structure in the psychosis spectrum.

Authors:  Sina Hafizi; Elisa Guma; Alex Koppel; Tania Da Silva; Michael Kiang; Sylvain Houle; Alan A Wilson; Pablo M Rusjan; M Mallar Chakravarty; Romina Mizrahi
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 7.217

10.  High-resolution In Vivo Manual Segmentation Protocol for Human Hippocampal Subfields Using 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Julie Winterburn; Jens C Pruessner; Chavez Sofia; Mark M Schira; Nancy J Lobaugh; Aristotle N Voineskos; M Mallar Chakravarty
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.