Literature DB >> 23415639

The shortened Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire: evaluation in a work-injured population.

Charles Philip Gabel1, Brendan Burkett, Markus Melloh.   

Abstract

The Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire (ÖMSQ) is a recently validated, 21-item instrument. It modified the original Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPainQ) providing broader focus and also improved development and practicality for identifying work-injured patients at-risk of persistent musculoskeletal problems. These instruments are critiqued for practicality and a shortened-version recommended. A 10-item ÖMPainQ was previously proposed for low-back-pain; however, general musculoskeletal populations require a broader validated instrument. To provide this, a two-stage retrospective study was performed. Stage 1 used three phases to: determined a minimum 12-item tool was required to ensure internal consistency (α > 0.70); subsequently developed two shortened ÖMSQ-12 versions from qualitative content-retention and quantitative factor analysis reductive methodologies; then calibrated both versions in a spine-cohort. Stage 2 validated and compared both versions' clinimetric properties in a general musculoskeletal-cohort to ascertain which was most appropriate. The ÖMPainQ-10 and a randomly-created ÖMPainQ-10 were compared post-hoc for criterion validity and factor structure. A physical therapy outpatients convenience sample (n = 279) was divided into developmental (spine = 136) and calibration (musculoskeletal = 143) cohorts. Primary outcomes were functional status, insurer-reported absenteeism and costs at six months. The qualitative-ÖMSQ-12 demonstrated preferred properties with higher 21-item-ÖMSQ correlation (r = 0.97; quantitative-ÖMSQ-12: r = 0.94; ÖMPainQ-10: r = 0.92; ÖMPainQ-10-random: r = 0.94) and improved predictive ability cut-offs for high-risk (72 ÖMSQ-12 points, 60%) and low-risk (57 ÖMSQ-12 points, 48%). The ÖMSQ-12 content-retention version is recommended. It demonstrated suitable internal consistency, a three-factor structure and high correlation with recovery time (r = 0.73). The ÖMSQ-12 will facilitate early identification and management of at-risk individuals and enable targeted intervention strategies through psychosocial informed management principles.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Injury; Musculoskeletal; Occupational; Outcome measure; Prognosis; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415639     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  12 in total

1.  Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; T Kohlmann; M Pfingsten; G Lindena; U Marnitz; K Pfeifer; J F Chenot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The most common classification in the mechanical diagnosis and therapy for patients with a primary complaint of non-acute knee pain was Spinal Derangement: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Sanshiro Hashimoto; Masatsugu Hirokado; Hiroshi Takasaki
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-09-12

3.  Psychometric Properties of the OSPRO-YF Screening Tool in Patients with Shoulder Pathology.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Veronica Palinkas; Susan Robarts; Deborah Kennedy
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takasaki; Charles Philip Gabel
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-08-10

5.  The Persian Version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Translation and Evaluation of its Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  S Elham Sharafi; Sina Hafizi; Mohammad Hosein Pourgharib Shahi; Ramin Kordi; Ahmad Ali Noorbala; Mohammad Arbabi; Ali-Akbar Nejatisafa
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-07

6.  Does the performance of five back-associated exercises relate to the presence of low back pain? A cross-sectional observational investigation in regional Australian council workers.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Jonathan Hoffman; Jason Osborne; E-Liisa Laakso; Markus Melloh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Psychological Treatment Strategy for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Tatsunori Ikemoto; Kenji Miki; Takako Matsubara; Norimitsu Wakao
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-10-10

Review 8.  Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.

Authors:  Elke Veirman; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Annick De Paepe; Olivia J Kirtley; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-11

9.  Relative difference among 27 functional measures in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory cross-sectional case-control study.

Authors:  K Vårbakken; H Lorås; K G Nilsson; M Engdal; A K Stensdotter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A case control series for the effect of photobiomodulation in patients with low back pain and concurrent depression.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Samuel R Petrie; David Mischoulon; Michael R Hamblin; Albert Yeung; Lisa Sangermano; Paolo Cassano
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.