| Literature DB >> 23414519 |
Hassan Elsiddig Hassan1, Ahmed Abdel Badie Mohamed, Amel Omer Bakhiet, Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed.
Abstract
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine if any relationship exists between expression of COX2 and iNOS markers and urinary schistosomiasis in bladder cancers.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23414519 PMCID: PMC3599865 DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-8-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Agent Cancer ISSN: 1750-9378 Impact factor: 2.965
The distribution of study population by age and gender
| Bladder SCC(n = 87) | ≤50 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 31.0 | 58.06 ± 12.14 |
| | 51-60 | 14 | 09 | 23 | 26.5 | |
| | 61-70 | 17 | 04 | 21 | 24.1 | |
| | >70 | 10 | 06 | 16 | 18.4 | |
| Bladder TCC(n = 68) | ≤ 50 | 03 | 02 | 05 | 07.4 | 69.49 ± 10.58 |
| | 51-60 | 05 | 04 | 09 | 13.2 | |
| | 61-70 | 15 | 06 | 21 | 30.9 | |
| | >70 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 48.5 | |
| Bladder cystitis(n = 39) | ≤50 | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02.6 | 75.26 ± 10.73 |
| | 51-60 | 02 | 01 | 03 | 07.7 | |
| | 61-70 | 08 | 01 | 09 | 20.0 | |
| >70 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 66.7 | ||
Figure 1Description of the study population by Pathology and gender.
Figure 2Description of the study population by Pathology and Residence.
The immunohistochmical of COX2 iNOS markers among bladder pathological conditions
| COX2 expression | Positive | 82 (94.3%) | 39 (57.4%) | 18 (46.2%) |
| | Negative | 5 (5.7%) | 29 (42.6%) | 21 (53.8%) |
| | P value | 0.0001 | 0.2824 | 0 |
| COX2 staining intensity | Low | 55 (63.2%) | 30 (44.1%) | 18 (46.2%) |
| | High | 27 (31.1%) | 11 (16.2%) | 0 (0%) |
| | P for low | 0.0148 | 0.0234 | 0 |
| | P for high | 0.037 | 0.088 | 0 |
| iNOS expression | Positive | 74 (85.1%) | 20 (29.4%) | 17 (43.6%) |
| | Negative | 13 (14.9%) | 48 (70.6) | 22 (56.4%) |
| | P value | 0.0004 | 0.1327 | 0 |
| iNOS staining intensity | Low | 54 (62.1%) | 19 (28%) | 17 (43.6%) |
| | High | 20 (23. %) | 3 (4.4%) | 0 (%) |
| | P for low | 0.3100 | 0.2504 | 0 |
| P for high | 0.0553 | 0.3649 | 0 |