Literature DB >> 23414232

The aggressive phenotype revisited: utilization of higher-risk liver allografts.

J M Garonzik-Wang1, N T James1, K J Van Arendonk1, N Gupta1, B J Orandi1, E C Hall1,2, A B Massie1, R A Montgomery1, N N Dagher1, A L Singer1, A M Cameron1, D L Segev1,3.   

Abstract

Organ shortage has led to increased utilization of higher risk liver allografts. In kidneys, aggressive center-level use of one type of higher risk graft clustered with aggressive use of other types. In this study, we explored center-level behavior in liver utilization. We aggregated national liver transplant recipient data between 2005 and 2009 to the center-level, assigning each center an aggressiveness score based on relative utilization of higher risk livers. Aggressive centers had significantly more patients reaching high MELDs (RR 2.19, 2.33 and 2.28 for number of patients reaching MELD>20, MELD>25 and MELD>30, p<0.001), a higher organ shortage ratio (RR 1.51, 1.60 and 1.51 for number of patients reaching MELD>20, MELD>25 and MELD>30 divided by number of organs recovered at the OPO, p<0.04), and were clustered within various geographic regions, particularly regions 2, 3 and 9. Median MELD at transplant was similar between aggressive and nonaggressive centers, but average annual transplant volume was significantly higher at aggressive centers (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.47-3.51, p<0.001). In cluster analysis, there were no obvious phenotypic patterns among centers with intermediate levels of aggressiveness. In conclusion, highwaitlist disease severity, geographic differences in organ availability, and transplant volume are the main factors associated with the aggressive utilization of higher risk livers. © Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414232     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  12 in total

1.  Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.

Authors:  Christine E Haugen; Tanveen Ishaque; Abel Sapirstein; Alexander Cauneac; Dorry L Segev; Sommer Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Sauman Chu; Helen Fu; Warren T McKinney; David Schladt; Jon J Snyder; W Ray Kim; Jack R Lake; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Wide variation in the percentage of donation after circulatory death donors across donor service areas - a potential target for improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  National Variation in Increased Infectious Risk Kidney Offer Acceptance.

Authors:  Courtenay M Holscher; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Sommer E Gentry; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Center-level trends in utilization of HCV-exposed donors for HCV-uninfected kidney and liver transplant recipients in the United States.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Ashton A Shaffer; Allan B Massie; Andrew Cameron; Niraj Desai; Mark Sulkowski; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Deceased Brain Dead Donor Liver Transplantation and Utilization in the United States: Nighttime and Weekend Effects.

Authors:  Dustin J Carpenter; Mariana C Chiles; Elizabeth C Verna; Karim J Halazun; Jean C Emond; Lloyd E Ratner; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Too aggressive or not aggressive enough? Should a metric change center practice?

Authors:  J C Lai; S Feng
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  A Donor Age-Based and Graft Volume-Based Analysis for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Elderly Recipients.

Authors:  Hajime Imamura; Masaaki Hidaka; Akihiko Soyama; Amane Kitasato; Tomohiko Adachi; Shinichiro Ono; Koji Natsuda; Takanobu Hara; Tota Kugiyama; Zhassulan Baimakhanov; Satomi Okada; Fumihiko Fujita; Kengo Kanetaka; Mitsuhisa Takatsuki; Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-06-06

9.  Trends in Outcomes for Marginal Allografts in Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Theodore Zhang; Jordan Dunson; Fasiha Kanwal; Nhu Thao Nguyen Galvan; John M Vierling; Christine O'Mahony; John A Goss; Abbas Rana
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Wide Variation in the Percentage of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Across Donor Service Areas: A Potential Target for Improvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sonnenberg; Jesse Y Hsu; Peter P Reese; David S Goldberg; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.385

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.