BACKGROUND: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), measures esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility (cross-sectional area/luminal pressure) during volume-controlled distension. The aim of this study is to apply this tool to the assessment of the EGJ in untreated and treated achalasia patients and to compare EGJ distensibility with other diagnostic tools utilized in managing achalasia. METHODS: Findings from FLIP, high-resolution manometry (HRM), timed barium esophagram, and symptom assessment by Eckardt Score (ES) were compared in 54 achalasia patients (23 untreated, 31 treated). Twenty healthy volunteers underwent FLIP as a comparator group. The EGJ distensibility index (EGJ-DI) was defined at the 'waist' of the FLIP bag during volumetric distension, expressed in mm(2) mmHg(-1) . The ES was used to gauge treatment outcome: good response < 3 or poor response ≥ 3. KEY RESULTS: Of the 31 treated patients, 17 had good and 14 poor treatment response. The EGJ-DI was significantly different among groups, greatest in the control subjects and least in the untreated patients; patients with good treatment response had significantly greater EGJ-DI than untreated or patients with poor response. The correlations between EGJ-DI and ES and integrated relaxation pressure on HRM were significant. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The FLIP provided a useful measure of EGJ distensibility in achalasia patients that correlated with symptom severity. The measurement of EGJ distensibility was complementary to existing tests suggesting a potentially important role in the clinical management of achalasia.
BACKGROUND: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), measures esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility (cross-sectional area/luminal pressure) during volume-controlled distension. The aim of this study is to apply this tool to the assessment of the EGJ in untreated and treated achalasiapatients and to compare EGJ distensibility with other diagnostic tools utilized in managing achalasia. METHODS: Findings from FLIP, high-resolution manometry (HRM), timed barium esophagram, and symptom assessment by Eckardt Score (ES) were compared in 54 achalasiapatients (23 untreated, 31 treated). Twenty healthy volunteers underwent FLIP as a comparator group. The EGJ distensibility index (EGJ-DI) was defined at the 'waist' of the FLIP bag during volumetric distension, expressed in mm(2) mmHg(-1) . The ES was used to gauge treatment outcome: good response < 3 or poor response ≥ 3. KEY RESULTS: Of the 31 treated patients, 17 had good and 14 poor treatment response. The EGJ-DI was significantly different among groups, greatest in the control subjects and least in the untreated patients; patients with good treatment response had significantly greater EGJ-DI than untreated or patients with poor response. The correlations between EGJ-DI and ES and integrated relaxation pressure on HRM were significant. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The FLIP provided a useful measure of EGJ distensibility in achalasiapatients that correlated with symptom severity. The measurement of EGJ distensibility was complementary to existing tests suggesting a potentially important role in the clinical management of achalasia.
Authors: A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Frédéric Nicodème; Annemijn de Ruigh; Yinglian Xiao; Shankar Rajeswaran; Ezra N Teitelbaum; Eric S Hungness; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Monika A Kwiatek; Kahrilas Kahrilas; Nathaniel J Soper; William J Bulsiewicz; Barry P McMahon; Hans Gregersen; John E Pandolfino Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; Joel Sternbach; Erica N Donnan; Laurel Friesen; Zoe Listernick; Benjamin Mogni; John E Pandolfino Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ezra N Teitelbaum; Nathaniel J Soper; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Lubomyr Boris; Frédéric Nicodème; Zhiyue Lin; Eric S Hungness Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; André J P M Smout; John E Pandolfino Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Anand S Jain; Dustin A Carlson; Joseph Triggs; Michael Tye; Wenjun Kou; Ryan Campagna; Eric Hungness; Donald Kim; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ezra N Teitelbaum; Lubomyr Boris; Fahd O Arafat; Frédéric Nicodème; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.584