Literature DB >> 23413365

The Effects of Computational Modeling Errors on the Estimation of Statistical Mechanical Variables.

John C Faver1, Wei Yang, Kenneth M Merz.   

Abstract

Computational models used in the estimation of thermodynamic quantities of large chemical systems often require approximate energy models that rely on parameterization and cancellation of errors to yield agreement with experimental measurements. In this work, we show how energy function errors propagate when computing statistical mechanics-derived thermodynamic quantities. Assuming that each microstate included in a statistical ensemble has a measurable amount of error in its calculated energy, we derive low-order expressions for the propagation of these errors in free energy, average energy, and entropy. Through gedanken experiments we show the expected behavior of these error propagation formulas on hypothetical energy surfaces. For very large microstate energy errors, these low-order formulas disagree with estimates from Monte Carlo simulations of error propagation. Hence, such simulations of error propagation may be required when using poor potential energy functions. Propagated systematic errors predicted by these methods can be removed from computed quantities, while propagated random errors yield uncertainty estimates. Importantly, we find that end-point free energy methods maximize random errors and that local sampling of potential energy wells decreases random error significantly. Hence, end-point methods should be avoided in energy computations and should be replaced by methods that incorporate local sampling. The techniques described herein will be used in future work involving the calculation of free energies of biomolecular processes, where error corrections are expected to yield improved agreement with experiment.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23413365      PMCID: PMC3568774          DOI: 10.1021/ct300024z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  7 in total

1.  Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins.

Authors:  David E Shaw; Paul Maragakis; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; Michael P Eastwood; Joseph A Bank; John M Jumper; John K Salmon; Yibing Shan; Willy Wriggers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sensitivity Analysis and Charge-Optimization for Flexible Ligands:  Applicability to Lead Optimization.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Kyle A Beauchamp; George Boxer; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein-ligand Complexes.

Authors:  John C Faver; Mark L Benson; Xiao He; Benjamin P Roberts; Bing Wang; Michael S Marshall; Matthew R Kennedy; C David Sherrill; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Limits of Free Energy Computation for Protein-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Pairwise additivity of energy components in protein-ligand binding: the HIV II protease-Indinavir case.

Authors:  Melek N Ucisik; Danial S Dashti; John C Faver; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  The energy computation paradox and ab initio protein folding.

Authors:  John C Faver; Mark L Benson; Xiao He; Benjamin P Roberts; Bing Wang; Michael S Marshall; C David Sherrill; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Fragment-based error estimation in biomolecular modeling.

Authors:  John C Faver; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Computer-aided Drug Design: Using Numbers to your Advantage.

Authors:  John C Faver; M Nihan Ucisik; Wei Yang; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics Calculations Using Chemical Host and Guest: A Comprehensive Picture of Molecular Recognition.

Authors:  Zhiye Tang; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  The Movable Type Method Applied to Protein-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Melek N Ucisik; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Molecular dynamics free energy simulations of ATP:Mg2+ and ADP:Mg2+ using the polarizable force field AMOEBA.

Authors:  Brandon Walker; Zhifeng Jing; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.178

Review 6.  Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions.

Authors:  Nusret Duygu Yilmazer; Martin Korth
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 7.271

7.  One Size Does Not Fit All: The Limits of Structure-Based Models in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Gregory A Ross; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  CYP 2D6 binding affinity predictions using multiple ligand and protein conformations.

Authors:  Lovorka Perić-Hassler; Eva Stjernschantz; Chris Oostenbrink; Daan P Geerke
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Role of substrate dynamics in protein prenylation reactions.

Authors:  Dhruva K Chakravorty; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  Bringing Clarity to the Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies via "Blurring"

Authors:  Melek N Ucisik; Zheng Zheng; John C Faver; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.