Pernilla Peterson1, Sven Månsson. 1. Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy and noise performance of fat quantification with multiple gradient-echo images acquired using bipolar read-out gradients and compare them with those of the well-established unipolar technique. THEORY: The bipolar read-out technique induces phase and amplitude errors caused by gradient delays, eddy currents, and frequency-dependent coil sensitivity. In this study, these errors were corrected for jointly with the fat/water separation by modeling the impact of these effects on the signal. This approach did not require acquisition of reference data or modification of the pulse sequence. METHODS: Simulations and a phantom experiment were used to investigate the accuracy and noise performance of the technique and compare them with those of a well-established technique using unipolar read-out gradients. Also, the in vivo feasibility was demonstrated for abdominal applications. RESULTS: The phantom experiment demonstrated similar accuracy of the bipolar and unipolar fat quantification techniques. In addition, the noise performance was shown not to be affected by the added estimations of the phase and amplitude errors for most inter-echo times. CONCLUSION: The bipolar technique was found to provide accurate fat quantification with noise performance similar to the unipolar technique given an appropriate choice of inter-echo time.
PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy and noise performance of fat quantification with multiple gradient-echo images acquired using bipolar read-out gradients and compare them with those of the well-established unipolar technique. THEORY: The bipolar read-out technique induces phase and amplitude errors caused by gradient delays, eddy currents, and frequency-dependent coil sensitivity. In this study, these errors were corrected for jointly with the fat/water separation by modeling the impact of these effects on the signal. This approach did not require acquisition of reference data or modification of the pulse sequence. METHODS: Simulations and a phantom experiment were used to investigate the accuracy and noise performance of the technique and compare them with those of a well-established technique using unipolar read-out gradients. Also, the in vivo feasibility was demonstrated for abdominal applications. RESULTS: The phantom experiment demonstrated similar accuracy of the bipolar and unipolar fat quantification techniques. In addition, the noise performance was shown not to be affected by the added estimations of the phase and amplitude errors for most inter-echo times. CONCLUSION: The bipolar technique was found to provide accurate fat quantification with noise performance similar to the unipolar technique given an appropriate choice of inter-echo time.
Authors: Jie Deng; Lisa M Neff; Nicholas C Rubert; Bin Zhang; Richard M Shore; Jonathan D Samet; Paige C Nelson; Lewis Landsberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Takeshi Yokoo; Suraj D Serai; Ali Pirasteh; Mustafa R Bashir; Gavin Hamilton; Diego Hernando; Houchun H Hu; Holger Hetterich; Jens-Peter Kühn; Guido M Kukuk; Rohit Loomba; Michael S Middleton; Nancy A Obuchowski; Ji Soo Song; An Tang; Xinhuai Wu; Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mahdi Salmani Rahimi; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Scott B Reeder; Frank R Korosec Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stefan Ruschke; Amber Pokorney; Thomas Baum; Holger Eggers; Jeffrey H Miller; Houchun H Hu; Dimitrios C Karampinos Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 2.310