Objective. The high temperature requirement factor A3 (HtrA3) is a serine protease homologous to bacterial HtrA. Four human HtrAs have been identified. HtrA1 and HtrA3 share a high degree of domain organization and are downregulated in a number of cancers, suggesting a widespread loss of these proteases in cancer. This study examined how extensively the HtrA (HtrA1-3) proteins are downregulated in commonly used cancer cell lines and primary ovarian tumors.Methods. RT-PCR was applied to various cancer cell lines (n=17) derived from the ovary, endometrium, testes, breast, prostate, and colon, and different subtypes of primary ovarian tumors [granulosa cell tumors (n=19), mucinous cystadenocarcinomas (n=6), serous cystadenocarcinomas (n=8)] and normal ovary (n = 9). HtrA3 protein was localized by immunohistochemistry.Results. HtrA3 was extensively downregulated in the cancer cell lines examined including the granulosa cell tumor-derived cell lines. In primary ovarian tumors, the HtrA3 was significantly lower in serous cystadenocarcinoma and granulosa cell tumors. In contrast, HtrA1 and HtrA2 were expressed in all samples with no significant differences between the control and tumors. In normal postmenopausal ovary, HtrA3 protein was localized to lutenizing stromal cells and corpus albicans. In serous cystadenocarcinoma, HtrA3 protein was absent in the papillae but detected in the mesenchymal cyst wall.Conclusion. HtrA3 is more extensively downregulated than HtrA1-2 in cancer cell lines. HtrA3, but not HtrA1 or HtrA2, was decreased in primary ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and granulosa cell tumors. This study provides evidence that HtrA3 may be the most relevant HtrA associated with ovarian malignancy.
Objective. The high temperature requirement factor A3 (HtrA3) is a serine protease homologous to bacterial HtrA. Four human HtrAs have been identified. HtrA1 and HtrA3 share a high degree of domain organization and are downregulated in a number of cancers, suggesting a widespread loss of these proteases in cancer. This study examined how extensively the HtrA (HtrA1-3) proteins are downregulated in commonly used cancer cell lines and primary ovarian tumors.Methods. RT-PCR was applied to various cancer cell lines (n=17) derived from the ovary, endometrium, testes, breast, prostate, and colon, and different subtypes of primary ovarian tumors [granulosa cell tumors (n=19), mucinous cystadenocarcinomas (n=6), serous cystadenocarcinomas (n=8)] and normal ovary (n = 9). HtrA3 protein was localized by immunohistochemistry.Results. HtrA3 was extensively downregulated in the cancer cell lines examined including the granulosa cell tumor-derived cell lines. In primary ovarian tumors, the HtrA3 was significantly lower in serous cystadenocarcinoma and granulosa cell tumors. In contrast, HtrA1 and HtrA2 were expressed in all samples with no significant differences between the control and tumors. In normal postmenopausal ovary, HtrA3 protein was localized to lutenizing stromal cells and corpus albicans. In serous cystadenocarcinoma, HtrA3 protein was absent in the papillae but detected in the mesenchymal cyst wall.Conclusion. HtrA3 is more extensively downregulated than HtrA1-2 in cancer cell lines. HtrA3, but not HtrA1 or HtrA2, was decreased in primary ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and granulosa cell tumors. This study provides evidence that HtrA3 may be the most relevant HtrA associated with ovarian malignancy.
Ovarian cancer undergoes progressive “dedifferentiation” from a well to a poorly differentiated tumor, then spreads to the pelvic and abdominal cavities before metastasizing to distant sites. It represents one of the most aggressive and heterogeneous cancer types in women and is a leading cause of gynaecological deaths 1, 2. The majority of ovarian cancerpatients are diagnosed at late stages when conventional therapy is less effective, leading to high levels of morbidity and mortality 3. It has therefore been proposed that survival for this highly lethal disease could be improved by developing screening methods that detect the disease when it is confined to the ovary. A number of biomarkers have been investigated which are involved in the development and progression of ovarian cancer 4. Despite initial responses to surgery and chemotherapy, most of the affected women ultimately die from recurrence and development of chemoresistance 5. These highlight the need for identifying new prognostic markers to better determine patients with more aggressive disease, appropriate for treatment.The high temperature requirement (HtrA) family of serine proteases are well conserved from bacteria to humans. Bacterial HtrA is the most studied member of this family and is necessary for bacterial survival at elevated temperatures 6. It acts as a chaperone at normal temperature and protease at elevated temperatures 7, 8. To date, four human HtrAs have been identified: HtrA1 9, 10, HtrA2 11, 12, HtrA3 13, 14 and HtrA4 15, 16. All HtrA proteins share a highly conserved serine protease domain and one PDZ domain at the C-terminus 17. They appear to be involved in inflammation, apoptosis, ischemia/reperfusion, neurodegenerative conditions and neuromuscular disorders, and protection against stress conditions including heat shock [reviewed in 18].HtrA proteins, especially HtrA1 and HtrA3, are reported to be downregulated in a number of cancers 19-21. Both HtrA1 and HtrA3 have been implicated as inhibitors of invasion and tumor suppression 22-24. HtrA1 is downregulated in SV40 transformed fibroblasts 9, 10. Several reports have indicated a tumor suppressive role for HtrA1 in breast, lymph node melanoma, ovarian and gastric cancers 21, 25-27.HtrA2 is a stress-activated protease that is up-regulated in mammalian cells in response to cellular stress 12. It is involved in apoptosis 28-30, a process which is impaired in cancer progression, and thus might play a role in malignancy.HtrA3 was initially identified as a pregnancy-related serine protease 31. Two variants of HtrA3 that arise from alternative mRNA splicing [long (HtrA3-L) and short (HtrA3-S)] have been identified 13. HtrA3-S is identical to the long form except it lacks the terminal PDZ domain 13. The HtrA3 isoforms may recognize different substrates and thus may have different functions. HtrA3 shares a high degree of sequence and domain organization with HtrA1 10, 13, suggesting similar functions. HtrA3 mRNA levels are reported to be downregulated with increasing grades of human endometrial, ovarian and lung cancer 20, 32, 33. The role of HtrA4, a newly identified member of the mammalianHtrA family, in cancer progression has not been reported.The aims of the present study were to evaluate and compare the extent of the downregulation of HtrA1, HtrA2, and HtrA3 (HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S) mRNA levels in a number of commonly used humancancer cell lines and different sub-types of primary ovarian tumor tissues [serous, mucinous and granulosa cell tumor (GCT)]. We further used immunohistochemistry to investigate HtrA3 protein localization in primary ovarian cancers.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines and total RNA
Humangranulosa cell tumor-derived cancer cells KGN and COV434, endometrial ECC1, HEC-1A, HEC-1B, Ishikawa, RL95-2 and AN3CA, testicular Ntera-2D, breast MCF-7 and MDA-231, prostate PC3, DU145 and LNCap, and colon SW480 and WIDR cell lines were cultured in medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (SAFC Biosciences, KS), 2mM L-glutamine, 100µg/ml streptomycin/100 IU/ml penicillin (both from Gibco, Carlsbad, CA). All cell lines were cultured in DMEM, except for HEC-1A in McCoy's, and RL95-2 cells in DMEM supplemented with 10µg/ml bovineinsulin (Actrapid, Novo Nordisk, Denmark). RNA was isolated using RNeasy Minikit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease-1 (DNA-free kit, Ambion, TX). Total RNA from human breast, prostate and testes was from Ambion (Life Technologies). Approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne to isolate total RNA from ovarian, colon and endometrial tissues.
Isolation of RNA from tissue specimens
Ovarian tumour tissues [granulosa cell tumors (n=19), mucinous cystadenocarcinomas (n=6) and serous cystadenocarcinomas (n=8)] were obtained from banked tissue samples which had previously been used in different studies 34-36. Normal ovarian tissues were obtained from nine premenopausal women who had undergone elective hysterectomy with oophorectomy for a range of conditions not associated with ovarian malignancy. Details of individual patients are provided in Table 1. The tissues were snap-frozen and then stored at -80 0C prior to RNA extraction. The Human Research and Ethics Committee of Monash Medical Centre approved this study protocol.
Table 1
Individual patient characteristics.
Sample number
Sample Type
Patient Age
Menopausal Status
Stage
S1
Serous
56
N/A
Unstaged
S2
Serous
71
Post
3C
S3
Serous
71
Post
3C
S4
Serous
75
Post
3C
S6
Serous
68
Post
3C
S7
Serous
83
Post
3C
S8
Serous
51
Post
3C
S9
Serous
72
Post
3C
M2
Mucinous
87
Post
Unstaged
M5
Mucinous
65
Post
1
M9
Mucinous
84
Post
1
M10
Mucinous
64
Post
2
M12
Mucinous
N/A
N/A
N/A
M13
Mucinous
N/A
N/A
N/A
N7
Normal
49
Pre
Fibroid uterus
N8
Normal
33
Pre
Intractable premenstrual tension
N9
Normal
30
Pre
Endometrial carcinoma
N10
Normal
50
Pre
Endometrial carcinoma
N11
Normal
48
Pre
endometriosis/adenomyosis
N13
Normal
48
Pre
N/A
818
Normal
N/A
N/A
N/A
884
Normal
N/A
N/A
N/A
927
Normal
N/A
N/A
N/A
G5
GCT
31
Pre
1
G6
GCT
48
Pre
Recurrent, metaststic
G7
GCT
43
Pre
1A
G9
GCT
85
Post
Recurrent, metaststic
G10
GCT
N/A
N/A
N/A
G11
GCT
66
Post
Recurrent, metaststic
G12
GCT
58
Post
Recurrent, metaststic
G13
GCT
17
Pre
Juvenile, recurrent (metastatic)
G14
GCT
50
Pre
Recurrent
G15
GCT
33
Pre
Juvenile, recurrent
G17
GCT
53
Pre
1
G18
GCT
54
Pre
1
G19
GCT
45
Pre
Recurrent
G20
GCT
71
Post
Recurrent
G22
GCT
4
Pre
Juvenile
G23 (137)
GCT
81
Post
High Grade
G24 (1342)
GCT
50
Post
1c
G26
GCT
54
Post
1
G27
GCT
79
Post
1
Pre: pre-menopausal; Post: post-menopausal; N/A: Not available. Samples from patients numbered - S1-S9 (n = 8) are serous; M2-M13 (n = 6) are mucinous; G5-G27 (n = 19) are from Granulosa cell tumor (GCT); N7-N13, 818, 884 and 927 (n = 9) are normal.
Total RNA was extracted from tissues using guanidinium thiocyanate-cesium chloride as previously described 37. All RNA samples were DNaseI-treated as per manufacturer's instructions (DNA-free kit; Ambion, Texas, USA). RNA concentration was determined at 260nm using an ND1000 Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Total RNA (1µg) was reverse transcribed using AMV reverse transcriptase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) as previously reported 24. The cDNA product (1µl) was amplified using GoTag green master mix (Promega, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia) and 10 pmol of forward and reverse primers for HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrA3 [long (L) and short (S) isoforms] and 18S (Table 2). All PCRs were run in duplicate and products were analysed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel (Roche), stained with Gel Red (Biotium, Stepney, SA, Australia) and imaged with Gel Doc-2000 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). A non template control in which diethyl pyrocarbonatewater was substituted for RT was included as a negative control. As a loading control, 18S was amplified for each RT reaction.
Table 2
The primer sequences and reaction conditions for RT-PCR.
Gene
Primer Sequences (5' - 3')F- Forward, R- Reverse
Annealing temperature (0C) and cycles (n) - Block PCR
F - GCC GTG GTC TAT ATC GAG ATC CTR - TGC CGG ATG TGA TCG TGT
58 (30 cycles)
343
HTRA3-L (Long)
F - ATG CGG ACG ATC ACA CCA AGR - CGC TGC CCT CCG TTG TCT G
58 (30 cycles)
337
HTRA3-S (short)
F - GAG GGC TGG TCA CAT GAA GAR - GCT CCG CTA ATT TCC AGT
53 (35 cycles)
320
18S
F - CGG CTA CCA CAT CCA AGG AAR - GCT GGA ATT ACC GCG GCT
64 (26 cycles)
187
Immunohistochemistry
Normal ovarian tissues and serous epithelial ovarian cancer tissues from post-menopausal women were collected prospectively from women undergoing surgery for suspected gynaecological malignancies. All samples were collected from anaesthetised patients who had no prior treatment for their malignancies, and had no other history of malignant disease. Tissue samples were collected with prior approval from the Southern Health Human Research Ethics Committee and with prior informed written consent from participants. The tissues were formalin fixed and embedded in paraffin.Sections of 5µm thickness on Superfrost plus slides were subjected to standard immunohistochemistry. After de-paraffinization and rehydration, antigen was retrieved by microwaving [5min 700W in 0.01mol/L sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0)], endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10min, and the non-specific binding was blocked with pre-immune blocking serum [15% normal rabbit serum plus 2% normal human serum in high salt Tris buffered saline (HS-TBS) with 0.1% Tween-20] for 40min at room-temperature. The primary antibody [custom-made sheep anti-HtrA3 antibody 14] or preimmune sheep IgG as a negative control (both 0.5µg/ml) was diluted in the blocking buffer (10% fetal calf serum in HB-TBS with 0.1% Tween-20) and sections were incubated at 37 0C for 1h and washed with high-saltTBS plus 0.6% Tween. The secondary antibody (biotinylated rabbit anti-sheep IgG, 1:200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was applied in the blocking buffer for 30min at room-temperature. Positive immunostaining was revealed by incubating the sections with an avidin-biotin-complex conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:100, Vectorstain elite ABC kit) for 30min at room-temperature, followed by the application of the peroxidase substrate 3,3N-diaminobenzidine (DAB, DakoCytomation) leading to a brown precipitate for positive staining. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and examined with Olympus BH2 microscope fitted with a Fujix HC-2000 high-resolution digital camera (Fujix, Tokyo, Japan). Sections from normal ovarian tissue were used as positive controls.
Densitometric and statistical analysis
Densitomety was performed using ImageJ software (Version 1.6, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Selected bands were quantified based on their relative intensities. Fold change was calculated relative to 18S for each sample. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism for Windows (GraphPad 5.0 Software, San Diego, CA) using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunns post test. P <0.05 was considered significant for data acquired in arbitrary density units.
Results
HtrA3 is more extensively and drastically downregulated than HtrA1 or HtrA2 in commonly used cancer cell lines
Expression of HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrA3 (HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S) in several well characterized cell lines derived from ovary, endometrium, testes, breast, prostrate, and colon was determined by conventional RT-PCR (Fig. 1A & B). Specific bands of expected size for each candidate gene were detected.
Figure 1
RT-PCR analysis of the mRNA levels of human HtrA1, HtrA2 and HrA3 [long (HtrA3-L) and short (HtrA3-S)] in various cancer cell lines. (A) Representative semi-quantitative PCR results from testes, breast, prostate, and colon control and cancer cell lines. (B) Representative semi-quantitative PCR results from ovarian and endometrial control and cancer cell lines. 18S amplification was used as loading control. Pre-menopausal and post-menopausal ovary - normal controls for ovary; Mid-Proliferative and Mid-Secretory - normal controls for mid proliferative and secretory phase endometrium respectively. Cancer cell lines examined, testes - Ntera-2D; breast - MCK-7, MDA-231; prostate - PC3, DU145, and LNCap; colon - SW480 and WIDR; ovary - KGN and COV434; endometrium - ECC1, HEC1-A, HEC1-B, Ishikawa, RL95-2 and AN3CA.
HtrA1 was consistently expressed in all control samples and in ovarian (n=2), endometrial (n=7), testicular (n=1) and prostate (n=3) cancer cell lines screened. It was downregulated in only one of the two breast and colon cancer cell lines examined (Fig. 1B).Similarly, HtrA2 was also consistently expressed in most of the cancer cell lines screened. All endometrial (n=7), prostate (n=3) and colon (n=2) cancer cell lines and controls were positive for HtrA2 (Fig. 1A & B). Weak HtrA2 signal was observed in control ovary and in both GCT-derived cancer cell lines, and in control testes and the testicular cancer cell line. Very low levels of HtrA2 were detected in breast control and in both breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 1A & B).In contrast, both HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S were downregulated in most of the cancer cell lines examined. In all control samples, positive HtrA3 expression was detected. HtrA3 expression was not detected in either GCT-derived cancer cell lines. Its expression was downregulated in five of the seven endometrial cancer cell lines, in both breast cancer cell lines, in two of the three prostate cancer cell lines, and one of the two colon cancer cell lines (Fig. 1A & B). However, positive HtrA3 mRNA was detected in the normal testis and testicular cancer cell lines (Fig. 1A & B).
HtrA3-L mRNA levels are significantly decreased in primary serous and granulosa ovarian tumors
We next determined the mRNA levels of HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrA3 isoforms (HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S) in ovarian tissue samples. Different sub-types of ovarian tumor [serous tumors (n=8), mucinous tumors (n=6), granulosa cell tumors (GCT, n=19)] were compared to normal premenopausal ovarian tissue (n=9).HtrA1 mRNA was clearly detected in all ovarian control and tumor samples (Fig. 2A). Densitometric analysis showed no significant differences between control and any ovarian tumor groups (Fig. 2B). HtrA1 mRNA was lower in serous tumors, but not significantly different from any other groups. HtrA1 expression was more variable across the GCT samples.
Figure 2
RT-PCR analysis of human HtrA1 expression in normal ovary and different types of ovarian tumors. (A) Representative semi-quantitative RT-PCR results from normal ovary and serous, mucinous and granulosa cell tumor (GCT) ovarian cancers. (B) Densitometric analysis showing the relative mRNA levels (corrected for 18S) in normal ovary and ovarian cancer samples. Patient details for normal and cancer groups are summarised in table 1.
HtrA2 was also detected in all ovarian control and tumor samples screened with no significant differences between the groups (Fig. 3A & B).
Figure 3
RT-PCR analysis of human HtrA2 expression in normal ovary and different types of ovarian tumors. (A) Representative semi-quantitative RT-PCR results from normal ovary and serous, mucinous and granulosa cell tumor (GCT) ovarian cancers. (B) Densitometric analysis showing relative mRNA levels (corrected for 18S) in normal ovary and ovarian cancer samples. Patient details for normal and cancer groups are summarised in table 1.
Both HtrA3 isoforms (HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S) were expressed in normal and tumor samples (Fig. 4A). However, densitometric analysis corrected for 18S showed that the two isoforms were differentially expressed. Compared to the normal tissues, the mean level of HtrA3-L was significantly reduced in the serous tumors and GCT (Fig. 4B). HtrA3-L mRNA levels were variable in mucinous tumors and the mean level was not significantly different from the control.
Figure 4
RT-PCR analysis of human HtrA3 (HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S) expression in normal ovary and different types of ovarian tumors. (A) Representative semi-quantitative RT-PCR results from normal ovary and serous, mucinous and granulosa cell tumor (GCT) ovarian cancers. (B & C) Densitometric analysis showing relative mRNA levels (corrected for 18S) in normal ovary and ovarian cancer samples. Patient details for normal and cancer groups are summarised in table 1. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01.
In contrast, compared to the normal tissues, although the mean levels of HtrA3-S mRNA were also low in serous tumors (Fig. 4C), the levels were not significantly different from the control. No significant changes in HtrA3-S expression were observed in any cancer groups.
HtrA3 protein levels were decreased progressively in serous ovarian tumors
Since HtrA3-L mRNA was significantly downregulated in serous ovarian tumors, we next determined the HtrA3 cellular localisation in the post-menopausal ovarian control and late stage serous carcinoma by immunohistochemistry.The post-menopausal ovary was dominated by a stroma composed of spindle shaped cells surrounded by abundant collagen bundles and blood vessels. In the post-menopausal ovary, ovarian follicles and the accompanying granulosa cell compartment are lost, as expected. In the control, moderate levels of HtrA3 (Fig. 5A & B) were detected predominantly in the stroma, particularly in the remaining luteinizing stromal cells and corpus albicans (Fig. 5B).
Figure 5
Human HtrA3 in normal and serous ovarian cancer tissues. Representative micrographs of post-menopausal control ovary and two serous (grade 3) cancer tissues immunostained for HtrA3. (A, B) Normal ovary, (C, D, E, F) Serous cancer - grade (G3) - from different patients. Right panel images are magnified view. Negative controls (preimmune sheep IgG) are in lower right inserts. Scale bar = 200 µm; applies to all panels. S - stromal cells; Leu S - lutenizing stromal cells; Mes cw - mesenchymal cell wall; Pap - papillae.
In the serous carcinoma tumors (grade-3, stages 2-4 - late cancer), papillae are lined by stratified cells of serous type with extensive cellular growth, cellular budding, and increased stromal invasion. In the papillae of the cancer, HtrA3 was significantly reduced or completely absent (Fig. 5C-F). On sections containing mesenchymal cyst wall and papillae (Fig. 5C & D), HtrA3 was detected in the mesenchymal cyst wall, but the papillae showed low HtrA3 staining. On sections containing no mesenchymal cyst wall (Fig. 5E & F), the papillae was almost negative for HtrA3.
Discussion
This study describes the comparison of the expression of HtrA serine proteases HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrA3 (HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S) in various cancer cell lines and in primary ovarian tumors. Our study demonstrates that both HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S are more widely lost than HtrA1 or HtrA2 in various cancer cell lines. In addition, we present evidence that HtrA3-L mRNA is significantly downregulated in primary serous and GCTs compared to normal controls. Our results also confirmed a downregulation of HtrA3 protein in late stage serous carcinoma. These findings provide further evidence that HtrA3-L may play an active role as a tumor suppressor in human GCTs and serous carcinomas.Our results are in agreement with the previous studies showing the downregulation of humanHtrA3 in ovarian, endometrial and lung cancers. Both HtrA1 and HtrA3 are secreted proteins with similar domain organisation, suggesting they have similar functions. Though previous studies have reported the downregulation of HtrA1 mRNA in different types of ovarian tumors 21, 33, our study revealed that the downregulation of HtrA3 is more widespread and extensive. In this study, HtrA1 was not found to be significantly reduced in various cancer cell lines or in primary ovarian tumors compared to normal controls. A previous study by Chien et al 21 has also shown that HtrA3 expression was lost in ovarian cell lines expressing HtrA1. Our study found differential expression for HtrA1 and HtrA3, not only in cancer cell lines but also in primary ovarian tumors. However, no direct correlation was observed between HtrA1 and HtrA3 levels in any of the sample group. The differential expression between HtrA1 and HtrA3 in ovarian cancer cells is intriguing; its significance warrants further investigation.Both HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S are downregulated in human GCT-derived cell lines, while only HtrA3-L was significantly downregulated in human primary GCT and serous carcinoma. Though levels of HtrA3-S also showed a similar downward pattern in serous carcinoma, it was not significantly different. Higher expression levels of HtrA3-L have been previously reported in ratovaries and also in primary granulosa cells treated with follicle-stimulating hormone 38. It is therefore possible that HtrA3 levels are decreased or non-detectable in the GCTs and GCT derived cell lines which cannot undergo luteinization. Since both HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S isoforms are proteolytically active 39, further work needs to resolve the role of HtrA3-L in ovarian tumorigenesis.HtrA3 can bind to TGF-β family members and inhibit TGF-β signalling, and its proteolytic activity is essential for the inhibition 40. It has also been shown to regulate the IGF/IGFBP system 13, 41 A number of ovarian processes require the action of growth factors including IGF-1 and TGF-β superfamily members 42. Studies have shown that TGF-β1 can act as a tumor suppressor at the early stages of tumorigenesis, when the tumor is still benign, and as a stimulator of tumor progression, invasion and metastasis at the late stages of tumorigenesis 43. Furthermore, HtrA3 exhibits substrate specificity toward certain extracellular matrix proteoglycans like decorin, biglycan and fibronectin 40, facilitates cell migration and invasion 24, 44, and hence HtrA3 may also modulate the ECM environment of the ovary. It is therefore possible that HtrA3 plays a role in ovarian tumorigenesis by regulating the actions and signalling of these growth factor systems in the ovary.Additional support for HtrA3 as a putative tumor suppressor came from a study in lung cancer. Beleford et al 19 showed that down-regulation of HtrA3 expression in smoking related lung cancers was associated with the cigarette smoke-induced methylation of HtrA3. As evidence exists showing that HtrA3 can be a predictive factor of clinical response to chemotherapy; a higher response rate was found for patients with lung cancers expressing higher levels of HtrA3 32. Similarly, due to epigenetic inactivation of HtrA1, lower levels of HtrA1 have been reported in lymph node melanoma, ovary, lung and breast cancers 21, 25, 27, 45. A previous study by Chien et al has indicated that HtrA1 expression enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel, whereas down-regulation attenuated cytotoxicity in ovarian and gastric cancers 46. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in ovarian tumor development may help to distinguish between the high- and low-risk patients and improve their clinical management.Proteases have been implicated in the development and progression of cancer, by degrading ECM and facilitating cell migration and invasion 47. However, a new concept is emerging demonstrating that proteases can act as tumour-suppressors. Specific serine proteases in the normal breast, prostate and testis are downregulated in cancers and function as tumour suppressors either by a loss of the gene or methylation in the promoter 48, 49. Our data suggests that HtrA3 may represent another tumor suppressor in this group.Moreover, the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) which is critical during embryonic development has a parallel role in tumorigenesis and contributes to tumor invasion, metastasis, and acquisition of therapeutic resistance 50-52. We have previously demonstrated that HtrA3 expression levels are inversely correlated with motility and invasion 24, 44, and acquisition of increased motility is one of the typical features of EMT. Similar to HtrA1 53, HtrA3 may function as a tumor suppressor by controlling the EMT, and may function in chemotherapeutic responsiveness by mediating DNA damage response pathways.In summary, we have shown that both HtrA3-L and HtrA3-S are more consistently downregulated than HtrA1 or HtrA2 in various commonly used cancer cell lines. Importantly, HtrA3-L mRNA and protein was significantly downregulated in primary serous and GCTs compared to controls. Collectively this study highlights the potential role of HtrA3 as a tumor suppressor. Further studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the role of HtrA3 in normal and malignant cells.
Authors: Jeremy Chien; Giovanni Aletti; Alfonso Baldi; Vincenzo Catalano; Pietro Muretto; Gary L Keeney; Kimberly R Kalli; Julie Staub; Michael Ehrmann; William A Cliby; Yean Kit Lee; Keith C Bible; Lynn C Hartmann; Scott H Kaufmann; Viji Shridhar Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Vincenzo Esposito; Mara Campioni; Antonio De Luca; Enrico P Spugnini; Feliciano Baldi; Roberto Cassandro; Alessandro Mancini; Bruno Vincenzi; Angela Groeger; Mario Caputi; Alfonso Baldi Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Marissa A Bowden; Lisa A Di Nezza-Cossens; Tom Jobling; Lois A Salamonsen; Guiying Nie Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Michael Rose; Claudia Schubert; Laura Dierichs; Nadine T Gaisa; Matthias Heer; Axel Heidenreich; Ruth Knüchel; Edgar Dahl Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: M Miyamoto; M Takano; K Iwaya; N Shinomiya; T Goto; M Kato; A Suzuki; T Aoyama; J Hirata; I Nagaoka; H Tsuda; K Furuya Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Joanna Renke; Eliza Wasilewska; Sabina Kędzierska-Mieszkowska; Katarzyna Zorena; Sylwia Barańska; Tomasz Wenta; Anna Liberek; Danuta Siluk; Dorota Żurawa-Janicka; Aleksandra Szczepankiewicz; Marcin Renke; Barbara Lipińska Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Dorota Zurawa-Janicka; Jarek Kobiela; Tomasz Slebioda; Rafal Peksa; Marcin Stanislawowski; Piotr Mieczyslaw Wierzbicki; Tomasz Wenta; Barbara Lipinska; Zbigniew Kmiec; Wojciech Biernat; Andrzej Jacek Lachinski; Zbigniew Sledzinski Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 5.923