Literature DB >> 23412405

AST classification of proximal humeral fractures: introduction and interobserver reliability assessment.

Christian Cuny1, Cedric Baumann, Julien Mayer, Didier Guignand, M'barek Irrazi, Aboubekr Berrichi, Nicolas Ionescu, Francis Guillemin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article introduces an alphanumeric AST (Articular, Surgical neck, Tuberosities) classification of proximal humeral fractures, based on the number, localization, and displacement of articular and extra-articular fragments. All possible cases of proximal humeral fractures can be assessed from a single figure using this classification. The aim of the study was thus to describe the AST classification and to assess interobserver reliability.
METHODS: This classification is based on a single figure, allowing an easy description of the anatomic variants of different proximal humeral fractures. The severity of the fracture is determined by the fragment displacement in angular degrees and the major linear displacement in millimeters. AST reproducibility was assessed and compared with Neer, AO, and Duparc classifications, commonly used in clinical practice. The interobserver agreement was measured with Cohen's kappa coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Thirteen independent observers analyzed a total of 64 X-rays. Overall kappa coefficients were 0.34, 0.29, 0.24, and 0.25 for AST, Neer, AO, and Duparc classifications, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The AST classification, which is easier to use because it is based on only one figure, is at least as reproducible as other proximal humeral fracture classifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 23412405     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-011-0916-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  20 in total

1.  Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system. A randomised trial.

Authors:  S Brorson; J Bagger; A Sylvest; A Hrøbjartsson; A Høbjartsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-09

Review 2.  Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  [Conservative treatment of fractures of the upper end of the humerus].

Authors:  F Duparc; D Huten
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1998-10

4.  The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. An assessment of interobserver variation.

Authors:  B Kristiansen; U L Andersen; C A Olsen; J E Varmarken
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Understanding proximal humerus fractures: image analysis, classification, and treatment.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Charles M Rowland; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; H Cattermole; M M McQueen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

8.  Reliability and reproducibility of radiographic interpretation of proximal humeral fracture pathoanatomy.

Authors:  P I Sallay; R A Pedowitz; W J Mallon; R M Vandemark; J D Dalton; K P Speer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  A three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  G Edelson; I Kelly; F Vigder; N D Reis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

10.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the MTM-classification for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Hagen Schmal; Erich Lingenfelter; Bernd Rolauffs; Kuno Weise; Klaus Dietz; Peter Helwig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  4 in total

1.  Proximal humerus fractures: editorial.

Authors:  Christian Cuny
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-04

2.  Analysis of four-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus: the interest of 2D and 3D imagery and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.

Authors:  X Ohl; P Mangin; C Barbe; V Brun; C Nerot; F Sirveaux
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-24

3.  Displaced three and four part proximal humeral fractures: prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study comparing intramedullary nailing and locking plate.

Authors:  Patrick Boyer; Camille Couffignal; Mohammad Bahman; Guy Mylle; Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Ruben Dukan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Antegrade nailing evolution for proximal humeral fractures, the Telegraph IV(®): a study of 67 patients.

Authors:  Christian Cuny; Thomas Goetzmann; Delphine Dedome; Jean-Baptiste Gross; M'Barek Irrazi; Aboubekr Berrichi; Julien Mayer; Pierre-Yves Le Coadou; Sorin Precup; Laurent Galois; Didier Mainard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.