Literature DB >> 23408234

Complete genome sequence of Oscillibacter valericigenes Sjm18-20(T) (=NBRC 101213(T)).

Yoko Katano1, Shun Fujinami, Akatsuki Kawakoshi, Hidekazu Nakazawa, Syoko Oji, Takao Iino, Akio Oguchi, Akiho Ankai, Shigehiro Fukui, Yasuyuki Terui, Sachi Kamata, Takeshi Harada, Satoshi Tanikawa, Ken-Ichiro Suzuki, Nobuyuki Fujita.   

Abstract

Oscillibacter valericigenes is a mesophilic, strictly anaerobic bacterium belonging to the clostridial cluster IV. Strain Sjm18-20(T) (=NBRC 101213(T) =DSM 18026(T)) is the type strain of the species and represents the genus Oscillibacter Iino et al. 2007. It was isolated from the alimentary canal of a Japanese corbicula clam (Corbicula japonica) collected on a seacoast in Shimane Prefecture in Japan. Phylogenetically, strain Sjm18-20(T) is closest to uncultured bacteria in digestive tracts, including the enriched cells thought to represent Oscillospira guilliermondii Chatton and Perard 1913. The isolated phylogenetic position and some distinct characteristics prompted us to determine the complete genome sequence. The 4,410,036 bp chromosome and the 60,586 bp plasmid were predicted to encode a total of 4,723 protein-coding genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japanese corbicula clam; alimentary canal; mesophile; oscillatory motility; strict anaerobe; valerate-producing

Year:  2012        PMID: 23408234      PMCID: PMC3558957          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2826118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain Sjm18-20T (=NBRC 101213T =DSM 18026T) is the type strain of the species , which is the type species of the monotypic genus Iino et al. 2007 [1]. The strain was isolated from the alimentary canal of a Japanese corbicula clam (Corbicula japonica) collected on a seacoast in Shimane Prefecture in Japan. The strain belongs to clostridial cluster IV, one of the 19 clusters of clostridial bacteria proposed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences [2]. Clostridial cluster IV includes phenotypically heterogeneous bacteria, most of which were isolated from digestive tracts and feces of various organisms as well as from anaerobic sewage sludge. While draft genome sequences of some species affiliated with cluster IV, including those obtained as reference sequences for human microbiome projects, have been published, complete genome sequences are thus far been limited to those of a ruminal cellulolytic bacterium 7 [3] and an ethanologenic sludge bacterium YUAN-3, both of which are phylogenetically distant from with 16S sequence similarities of 86% and 84%, respectively. In addition, the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Sjm18-20T is distantly related to the other species within the cluster (Figure 1), with similarity values less than 91%. Instead, the 16S gene sequence is most similar to those of uncultured bacteria in digestive tracts and feces of both herbivorous and omnivorous animals. The latter include the large cells enriched from sheep rumen contents by flow cytometric sorting, which are thought to represent Chatton and Perard 1913 [5]. Although was first described nearly a century ago [6] and has attracted much attention due to its conspicuous morphology, growth in pure culture has not been achieved. In the current NCBI taxonomy database [7], the family Peshkoff 1940 [8] is tentatively classified within the order to accommodate and related environmental samples, although there is no type strain for the type species . Accordingly, the strain Sjm18-20T is currently the only strain in this family having a validly published name.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of strain Sjm18-20T relative to other representative type strains within the clostridial cluster IV. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method [4] based on an alignment of 1,339 bp 16S rRNA gene sequences. Corresponding INSDC accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Numbers at nodes indicate support values obtained from 1,000 bootstrap replications. Type strains within the clostridial cluster III were used as the outgroup. Species for which draft assembly sequences are available are labeled with one asterisk, while species for which complete genome sequences are available are labeled with two asterisks. INSDC accession numbers for draft and complete genome sequences are as follows: , ABGD00000000; , ABCB00000000; , ACEC00000000; , CP002400; , ABCA00000000; F. prausnitzii, ACOP00000000; F. plautii, AGCK00000000; , AP012044; P.capillosus, AAXG00000000; , CP002403; , FP929051; , ACOK00000000; , ACBY00000000; , CP001348; , CP000568.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of strain Sjm18-20T relative to other representative type strains within the clostridial cluster IV. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method [4] based on an alignment of 1,339 bp 16S rRNA gene sequences. Corresponding INSDC accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Numbers at nodes indicate support values obtained from 1,000 bootstrap replications. Type strains within the clostridial cluster III were used as the outgroup. Species for which draft assembly sequences are available are labeled with one asterisk, while species for which complete genome sequences are available are labeled with two asterisks. INSDC accession numbers for draft and complete genome sequences are as follows: , ABGD00000000; , ABCB00000000; , ACEC00000000; , CP002400; , ABCA00000000; F. prausnitzii, ACOP00000000; F. plautii, AGCK00000000; , AP012044; P.capillosus, AAXG00000000; , CP002403; , FP929051; , ACOK00000000; , ACBY00000000; , CP001348; , CP000568.

Organism information

Strain Sjm18-20T is a mesophilic, neutrophilic, strictly anaerobic bacterium with features as summarized in Table 1 [1]. Unlike other clostridial bacteria, which are typically characterized as being low G+C content, Gram-positive, endospore-forming and anaerobic, Sjm18-20T is Gram-stain negative and non-sporulating. Cells are straight to slightly curved rods with 0.4-0.6 × 2.5-6.0 μm in size. Cells are elongated after prolonged cultivation and often reach 30 μm in length. Optimum growth is observed at 30°C and pH 6.0-6.5. The strain tolerates up to 4% NaCl, but growth is also observed in the absence of NaCl.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Sjm18-20T

MIGS ID     Property     Term   Evidence codea
     Domain Bacteria   TAS [9]
     Phylum Firmicutes   TAS [10-12]
     Class Clostridia   TAS [13,14]
     Current classification     Order Clostridiales   TAS [15,16]
     Family Oscillospiraceae   NAS [15,17]
     Genus Oscillibacter   TAS [18]
     Species Oscillibacter valericigenes   TAS [1]
     Type strain Sjm18-20   TAS [1]
     Gram stain     negative   TAS [1]
     Cell shape     straight or slightly curved rods   TAS [1]
     Motility     oscillatory motility by peritrichous flagella   TAS [1]
     Sporulation     non-sporulating   TAS [1]
     Temperature range     15-35°C   TAS [1]
     Optimum temperature     30°C   TAS [1]
     Carbon source     yeast extract, polypeptone   TAS [1]
     Energy source     heterotrophic   TAS [1]
     Terminal electron receptor
MIGS-6     Habitat     alimentary canal of Japanese corbicula clam (Corbicula japonica)   TAS [1]
MIGS-6.3     Salinity     0-4% NaCl (no growth in 6%)   TAS [1]
MIGS-22     Oxygen     strictly anaerobic   TAS [1]
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship     free-living   NAS
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity     none   NAS
MIGS-4     Geographic location     sea coast in Shimane Pref., Japan   TAS [1]
MIGS-5     Sample collection time     November 10, 2004   NAS
MIGS-4.1      Latitude
MIGS-4.2     Longitude     NAS
MIGS-4.3     Depth     NAS
MIGS-4.4     Altitude     NAS

a) Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19].

a) Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. Cells are motile with oscillatory movements. Electron microscopic observation demonstrated the presence of peritrichous flagella [1]. In agreement with this observation, the genome encodes genes necessary for flagellar synthesis and chemotaxis, as is typical in many Gram-positive bacteria. In contrast, while some clostridial bacteria, including the pathogenic species are known to utilize type IV pili for their gliding motility [20], neither genes encoding the constituents of type IV pili, nor the gld motility genes of [21], were found in the Sjm18-20T genome, suggesting that flagella are solely responsible for the oscillatory movements. Strain Sjm18-20T grows poorly even in the medium supplemented with 0.5% each of yeast extract and polypeptone, with a generation time of 18.3 hours under optimum growth conditions [1]. From the genome sequence, strain Sjm18-20T seems to be able to synthesize most amino acids, with the exception of branched-chain amino acids. The genome encodes, however, several ABC transporters possibly involved in the uptake of branched-chain amino acids (OBV_11160-11200, OBV_36860-6900 and OBV_40040-40050). The strain grows fermentatively and produces acids from D-glucose, L-arabinose, D-ribose and D-xylose, with n-valeric acid being the major end product from glucose [1]. Consistent with these observations, genes encoding catabolic enzymes and possible transporters for these sugars could be assigned on the genome. However, we could not identify a gene encoding the authentic form of enolase (EC 4.2.1.11), which catalyzes the penultimate step of glycolysis. Trials of genomic PCR using degenerate primers designed based on the enolase gene sequences of related clostridial bacteria also failed (data not shown). Considering the fermentative phenotype of the strain, either an alternative enolase-like enzyme or a novel metabolic pathway which directs the glycolytic flow towards the synthesis of pyruvate could be present. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences unequivocally placed strain Sjm18-20T within the clostridial cluster IV [1] (Figure 1). In addition, phylogenetic analysis based on protein-coding genes such as ileS, valS, gyrB and rplKLM, which were extracted from genomic sequences, consistently placed strain Sjm18-20T within the cluster IV (data not shown).

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Sjm18-20T was selected for sequencing because of its isolated phylogenetic position and characteristics which distinguish this strain from other described clostridial species. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [25].
Table 2

Project information

MIGS ID    Property    Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used    Three genomic libraries; two plasmid libraries with average insert sizes of 1.7kb    and 4.6kb and a fosmid library with average insert size of 40 kb
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms    ABI 3730xl
MIGS-31.2    Fold coverage    10.2 ×
MIGS-30    Assemblers    Phrap [22,23]
MIGS-32    Gene calling method    Glimmer3 [24]
    INSDC ID    AP012044.1 (chromosome)    AP012045.1 (plasmid pOBV01)
    Genbank Date of Release    Oct 1, 2011
    NCBI project ID    41823
    GOLD ID    Gc01995
MIGS-13    Source material identifier    NBRC 101213
    Project relevance    biotechnology, systematics

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Sjm18-20T cells were grown in a 200 ml volume at 30°C under N2 atmosphere in GYP medium in which air had been replaced with nitrogen gas by flushing [1]. DNA was isolated from 1 g of wet cells by manual extraction after lysis with lysozyme and SDS.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of Sjm18-20T was sequenced using the conventional whole-genome shotgun sequencing method. DNA shotgun libraries with average insert sizes of 1.7kb and 4.6kb were generated in pUC18 (TaKaRa), while a fosmid library with average insert size of 40 kb was constructed in pCC1FOS (EPICENTRE) as described previously [26]. A total of 37,824 clones (20,352, 12,288 and 5,184 clones from libraries with 1.7kb, 4.6 kb and 40 kb inserts, respectively) were subjected to sequencing from both ends of the inserts on ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence reads were trimmed at a threshold of 20 in Phred score and assembled by using Phrap and CONSED assembly tools [22,23]. For alignment and validation of contigs, Optical Mapping (OpGen) was used. Gaps between contigs were closed by sequencing PCR products which bridge two neighboring contigs. Finally, each base of the genome was ensured to be sequenced from multiple clones either from both directions with Phrap quality score≧70 or from one direction with Phrap quality score ≧40.

Genome annotation

Complete sequences of the chromosome and the plasmid were analyzed using Glimmer3 [24] for predicting protein-coding genes, tRNAscan-SE [27] and ARAGORN [28] for tRNA genes, and RNAmmer [29] for rRNA genes. The functions of predicted protein-coding genes were assigned manually, using in-house genome annotation system OCSS (unpublished), from the comparison with Uniprot [30], Interpro [31], HAMAP [32] and KEGG [33] databases.

Genome properties

The genome of Sjm18-20T consisted of a circular chromosome of 4,410,036 bp and a circular plasmid of 60,586 bp (Figure 2). The chromosome was predicted to contain 4,656 protein-coding genes, 58 tRNA genes, 9 rRNA genes and 5 other RNA genes, whereas the plasmid contained 67 predicted protein-coding genes. Of the total of 4,723 protein-coding genes predicted in the genome, 2,483 (52.6%) were assigned known functions, 1,499 (31.7%) were similar to genes with unknown function in other bacterial genomes, and 741 (15.7%) had no similarity with other genes. Average G+C contents of the chromosome and the plasmid were 53.3% and 43.3%, respectively. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 3-4.
Figure 2

Circular representation of the Sjm18-20T chromosome and the plasmid. From outside to the center: circles 1 and 2, predicted protein coding genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively; circle 3, tRNA genes; circle 4, rRNA operons; circle 5, G+C content; circle 6, GC skew. Predicted protein coding genes are colored according to their assigned COG functional categories (see Table 4).

Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute   Value   % of totala
Genome Size (bp)   4,470,622   100.0%
Coding region (bp)   3,837,687   85.8%
G+C content (bp)   2,377,733   53.2%
Number of replicons   1
Extrachromosomal elements   1
Total genes   4,795
RNA genes   72
rRNA operons   3
Protein-coding genes   4,723   100.0%
Pseudo genes   0   0.0%
Genes with function prediction   2,483   52.6%
Genes in paralog clusters   1,666   35.3%
Genes assigned to COGs   3,037   64.3%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   3,007   63.7%
Genes with signal peptides   1,064   22.5%
Genes with transmembrane helices   1,002   21.2%
Paralogous groups   500   % of totala

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code   Value   % agea    Description
J   160   3.39    Translation
A   1   0.02    RNA processing and modification
K   375   7.94    Transcription
L   419   8.87    Replication, recombination and repair
B    0   0.00    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   47   1.00    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y   0   0.00    Nuclear structure
V   92   1.95    Defense mechanisms
T   222   4.70    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   116   2.46    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   61   1.29    Cell motility
Z   1   0.02    Cytoskeleton
W   0   0.00    Extracellular structures
U   60   1.27    Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O   81   1.72    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   224   4.74    Energy production and conversion
G   150   3.18    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   284   6.01    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   77   1.63    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   103   2.18    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   79   1.67    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   125   2.65    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   34   0.72    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   370   7.83    General function prediction only
S   240   5.08    Function unknown
-   1,686   35.70    Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Circular representation of the Sjm18-20T chromosome and the plasmid. From outside to the center: circles 1 and 2, predicted protein coding genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively; circle 3, tRNA genes; circle 4, rRNA operons; circle 5, G+C content; circle 6, GC skew. Predicted protein coding genes are colored according to their assigned COG functional categories (see Table 4). a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome. The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Similarities to

Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that Sjm18-20T is closely related to the uncultivated cells thought to represent Chatton and Perard 1913 [5]. In addition, strain Sjm18-20T shares some phenotypic characteristics, including the elongated and often curved cell morphology, the oscillatory motility by means of peritrichous flagella, and the Gram-negative staining, with those described for [1]. However, while was reported to form endospores, spore formation was not detected with Sjm18-20T by microscopic observations and by heat treatment for testing the presence of heat resistant bodies such as spores. In phylogenetically related bacteria such as and , phosphorylation of Spo0A, a master regulatory factor, is known to initiate the process of sporulation through the successive synthesis of sporulation-stage specific sigma factors. We found that the genome of strain Sjm18-20T encoded the Spo0A factor (OBV_15500) and all sporulation sigma factors known in other bacteria, i.e., sigma H (OBV_22080), sigma E (OBV_21490), sigma F (OBV_29180), sigma K (OBV_12200), and sigma G (OBV_24420), as well as other regulatory proteins related to the sigma cascade. In contrast, genes necessary for the later stages of sporulation, i.e., the formation of cortex and spore coat, seemed either largely different or partly missing. For example, cotF, cotS and yabQ genes, widely found in the genomes of clostridial species, could not be found in the genome of strain Sjm18-20T. Strain Sjm18-20T might have the potential for sporulation, although it needs to be further investigated whether conditions exist under which this bacterium would actually sporulate.
  22 in total

1.  Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer.

Authors:  Arthur L Delcher; Kirsten A Bratke; Edwin C Powers; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Complete genome sequence of the soil actinomycete Kocuria rhizophila.

Authors:  Hiromi Takarada; Mitsuo Sekine; Hiroki Kosugi; Yasunori Matsuo; Takatomo Fujisawa; Seiha Omata; Emi Kishi; Ai Shimizu; Naofumi Tsukatani; Satoshi Tanikawa; Nobuyuki Fujita; Shigeaki Harayama
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Novel features of the polysaccharide-digesting gliding bacterium Flavobacterium johnsoniae as revealed by genome sequence analysis.

Authors:  Mark J McBride; Gary Xie; Eric C Martens; Alla Lapidus; Bernard Henrissat; Ryan G Rhodes; Eugene Goltsman; Wei Wang; Jian Xu; David W Hunnicutt; Andrew M Staroscik; Timothy R Hoover; Yi-Qiang Cheng; Jennifer L Stein
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations.

Authors:  M D Collins; P A Lawson; A Willems; J J Cordoba; J Fernandez-Garayzabal; P Garcia; J Cai; H Hippe; J A Farrow
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1994-10

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment.

Authors:  Minoru Kanehisa; Michihiro Araki; Susumu Goto; Masahiro Hattori; Mika Hirakawa; Masumi Itoh; Toshiaki Katayama; Shuichi Kawashima; Shujiro Okuda; Toshiaki Tokimatsu; Yoshihiro Yamanishi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The universal protein resource (UniProt).

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  12 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of a food supplement with standardized menthol, limonene, and gingerol content in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Vladimir T Ivashkin; Anna V Kudryavtseva; George S Krasnov; Yuri M Poluektov; Margarita A Morozova; Oleg S Shifrin; Allan G Beniashvili; Zarina A Mamieva; Alexandra L Kovaleva; Anatoly I Ulyanin; Elizaveta A Trush; Alexander G Erlykin; Elena A Poluektova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Mechanistic Insights into the Link between Gut Dysbiosis and Major Depression: An Extensive Review.

Authors:  Sharma Sonali; Bipul Ray; Hediyal Ahmed Tousif; Annan Gopinath Rathipriya; Tuladhar Sunanda; Arehally M Mahalakshmi; Wiramon Rungratanawanich; Musthafa Mohamed Essa; M Walid Qoronfleh; Saravana Babu Chidambaram; Byoung-Joon Song
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 7.666

3.  Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; R Jeff Buhr; Casey W Ritz; Brian H Kiepper; Mark E Berrang; Bruce S Seal; Nelson A Cox
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Gut dysbiosis is associated with metabolism and systemic inflammation in patients with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Kazuo Yamashiro; Ryota Tanaka; Takao Urabe; Yuji Ueno; Yuichiro Yamashiro; Koji Nomoto; Takuya Takahashi; Hirokazu Tsuji; Takashi Asahara; Nobutaka Hattori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Microbial potential for carbon and nutrient cycling in a geogenic supercritical carbon dioxide reservoir.

Authors:  Adam J E Freedman; BoonFei Tan; Janelle R Thompson
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 6.  Organic Acids and Potential for Modifying the Avian Gastrointestinal Tract and Reducing Pathogens and Disease.

Authors:  Dana K Dittoe; Steven C Ricke; Aaron S Kiess
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-09-06

Review 7.  Homo-Acetogens: Their Metabolism and Competitive Relationship with Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens.

Authors:  Supriya Karekar; Renan Stefanini; Birgitte Ahring
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-08

8.  Ban-Lan-Gen Granule Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Chronic Relapsing Colitis in Mice via Regulating Gut Microbiota and Restoring Gut SCFA Derived-GLP-1 Production.

Authors:  Jiao Peng; Xi Li; Lin Zheng; Lifang Duan; Zhengxian Gao; Die Hu; Jie Li; Xiaofeng Li; Xiangchun Shen; Haitao Xiao
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Intestinal Microbiome in Irritable Bowel Syndrome before and after Gut-Directed Hypnotherapy.

Authors:  Johannes Peter; Camille Fournier; Bettina Keip; Nina Rittershaus; Nicola Stephanou-Rieser; Marija Durdevic; Clemens Dejaco; Maria Michalski; Gabriele Moser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Oscillospira - a candidate for the next-generation probiotics.

Authors:  Jingpeng Yang; Yanan Li; Zhiqiang Wen; Wenzheng Liu; Lingtong Meng; He Huang
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.