PURPOSE: MicroRNA-31 (miR-31) has different expression patterns in various human cancers. Especially in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, it has been demonstrated to be decreased expression in the invasive tumors and homozygously deleted. However, its clinical significance in human bladder cancer has not yet been elucidated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of miR-31 in this disease. METHODS: Expression levels of miR-31 in 126 pairs of bladder cancer and adjacent normal tissues were detected by real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. To determine its prognostic value, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: MiR-31 expression in bladder cancer tissues was significantly lower than those in adjacent normal tissues (mean expression level: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2, P < 0.001). When categorized into low vs. high expression, low miR-31 expression was negatively associated with the tumor stage (P = 0.02), the status of recurrence (P = 0.01), progression (P = 0.01), and death (P = 0.006) of patients with bladder cancer. Moreover, low miR-31 expression clearly predicted poorer PFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, low miR-31 expression was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (P = 0.01) and OS (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: These findings show that miR-31 may contribute to the progression of bladder cancer and its downregulation may be independently associated with unfavorable PFS and OS, suggesting that miR-31 might be a promising marker for further risk stratification in the treatment of this cancer.
PURPOSE:MicroRNA-31 (miR-31) has different expression patterns in various humancancers. Especially in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, it has been demonstrated to be decreased expression in the invasive tumors and homozygously deleted. However, its clinical significance in humanbladder cancer has not yet been elucidated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of miR-31 in this disease. METHODS: Expression levels of miR-31 in 126 pairs of bladder cancer and adjacent normal tissues were detected by real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. To determine its prognostic value, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS:MiR-31 expression in bladder cancer tissues was significantly lower than those in adjacent normal tissues (mean expression level: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2, P < 0.001). When categorized into low vs. high expression, low miR-31 expression was negatively associated with the tumor stage (P = 0.02), the status of recurrence (P = 0.01), progression (P = 0.01), and death (P = 0.006) of patients with bladder cancer. Moreover, low miR-31 expression clearly predicted poorer PFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, low miR-31 expression was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (P = 0.01) and OS (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: These findings show that miR-31 may contribute to the progression of bladder cancer and its downregulation may be independently associated with unfavorable PFS and OS, suggesting that miR-31 might be a promising marker for further risk stratification in the treatment of this cancer.
Authors: Colin P N Dinney; David J McConkey; Randall E Millikan; Xifeng Wu; Menashe Bar-Eli; Liana Adam; Ashish M Kamat; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Tomasz Tuziak; Anita L Sabichi; H Barton Grossman; William F Benedict; Bogdan Czerniak Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Andrew Grimson; Kyle Kai-How Farh; Wendy K Johnston; Philip Garrett-Engele; Lee P Lim; David P Bartel Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Srinivas Veerla; David Lindgren; Anders Kvist; Attila Frigyesi; Johan Staaf; Helena Persson; Fredrik Liedberg; Gunilla Chebil; Sigurdur Gudjonsson; Ake Borg; Wiking Månsson; Carlos Rovira; Mattias Höglund Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Pablo Landgraf; Mirabela Rusu; Robert Sheridan; Alain Sewer; Nicola Iovino; Alexei Aravin; Sébastien Pfeffer; Amanda Rice; Alice O Kamphorst; Markus Landthaler; Carolina Lin; Nicholas D Socci; Leandro Hermida; Valerio Fulci; Sabina Chiaretti; Robin Foà; Julia Schliwka; Uta Fuchs; Astrid Novosel; Roman-Ulrich Müller; Bernhard Schermer; Ute Bissels; Jason Inman; Quang Phan; Minchen Chien; David B Weir; Ruchi Choksi; Gabriella De Vita; Daniela Frezzetti; Hans-Ingo Trompeter; Veit Hornung; Grace Teng; Gunther Hartmann; Miklos Palkovits; Roberto Di Lauro; Peter Wernet; Giuseppe Macino; Charles E Rogler; James W Nagle; Jingyue Ju; F Nina Papavasiliou; Thomas Benzing; Peter Lichter; Wayne Tam; Michael J Brownstein; Andreas Bosio; Arndt Borkhardt; James J Russo; Chris Sander; Mihaela Zavolan; Thomas Tuschl Journal: Cell Date: 2007-06-29 Impact factor: 41.582