Literature DB >> 23407492

Behavioural and genetic analyses of Nasonia shed light on the evolution of sex pheromones.

Oliver Niehuis1, Jan Buellesbach, Joshua D Gibson, Daniela Pothmann, Christian Hanner, Navdeep S Mutti, Andrea K Judson, Jürgen Gadau, Joachim Ruther, Thomas Schmitt.   

Abstract

Sex pheromones play a pivotal role in the communication of many sexually reproducing organisms. Accordingly, speciation is often accompanied by pheromone diversification enabling proper mate finding and recognition. Current theory implies that chemical signals are under stabilizing selection by the receivers who thereby maintain the integrity of the signals. How the tremendous diversity of sex pheromones seen today evolved is poorly understood. Here we unravel the genetics of a newly evolved pheromone phenotype in wasps and present results from behavioural experiments indicating how the evolution of a new pheromone component occurred in an established sender-receiver system. We show that male Nasonia vitripennis evolved an additional pheromone compound differing only in its stereochemistry from a pre-existing one. Comparative behavioural studies show that conspecific females responded neutrally to the new pheromone phenotype when it evolved. Genetic mapping and gene knockdown show that a cluster of three closely linked genes accounts for the ability to produce this new pheromone phenotype. Our data suggest that new pheromone compounds can persist in a sender's population, without being selected against by the receiver and without the receiver having a pre-existing preference for the new pheromone phenotype, by initially remaining unperceived. Our results thus contribute valuable new insights into the evolutionary mechanisms underlying the diversification of sex pheromones. Furthermore, they indicate that the genetic basis of new pheromone compounds can be simple, allowing them to persist long enough in a population for receivers to evolve chemosensory adaptations for their exploitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23407492     DOI: 10.1038/nature11838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  27 in total

1.  Evolution of multicomponent pheromone signals in small ermine moths involves a single fatty-acyl reductase gene.

Authors:  Marjorie A Liénard; Asa K Hagström; Jean-Marc Lassance; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The evolution of pheromone diversity.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Allelic variation in a fatty-acyl reductase gene causes divergence in moth sex pheromones.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lassance; Astrid T Groot; Marjorie A Liénard; Binu Antony; Christin Borgwardt; Fredrik Andersson; Erik Hedenström; David G Heckel; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A method for parental RNA interference in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Jeremy A Lynch; Claude Desplan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Cytonuclear genic incompatibilities cause increased mortality in male F2 hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N. vitripennis.

Authors:  Oliver Niehuis; Andrea K Judson; Jürgen Gadau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  An epoxide hydrolase involved in the biosynthesis of an insect sex attractant and its use to localize the production site.

Authors:  Mohatmed Abdel-Latief; Leif A Garbe; Markus Koch; Joachim Ruther
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanism and behavioral context of male sex pheromone release in Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Sven Steiner; Joachim Ruther
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Penny C Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Chris Boursnell; Ningze Pang; Kristoffer Forslund; Goran Ceric; Jody Clements; Andreas Heger; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Sex pheromone evolution is associated with differential regulation of the same desaturase gene in two genera of leafroller moths.

Authors:  Jérôme Albre; Marjorie A Liénard; Tamara M Sirey; Silvia Schmidt; Leah K Tooman; Colm Carraher; David R Greenwood; Christer Löfstedt; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Medium- and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase gene and protein families : the SDR superfamily: functional and structural diversity within a family of metabolic and regulatory enzymes.

Authors:  K L Kavanagh; H Jörnvall; B Persson; U Oppermann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.261

View more
  56 in total

1.  An oral male courtship pheromone terminates the response of Nasonia vitripennis females to the male-produced sex attractant.

Authors:  Joachim Ruther; Theresa Hammerl
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Floral odour chemistry defines species boundaries and underpins strong reproductive isolation in sexually deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Michael R Whitehead
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Genetic and epigenetic architecture of sex-biased expression in the jewel wasps Nasonia vitripennis and giraulti.

Authors:  Xu Wang; John H Werren; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selection on male sex pheromone composition contributes to butterfly reproductive isolation.

Authors:  P M B Bacquet; O Brattström; H-L Wang; C E Allen; C Löfstedt; P M Brakefield; C M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Reproductive Dominance Strategies in Insect Social Parasites.

Authors:  Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Pheromone receptor evolution in the cryptic leafroller species, Ctenopseustis obliquana and C. herana.

Authors:  Bernd Steinwender; Amali H Thrimawithana; Ross N Crowhurst; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Cuticular hydrocarbon divergence in the jewel wasp Nasonia: evolutionary shifts in chemical communication channels?

Authors:  J Buellesbach; J Gadau; L W Beukeboom; F Echinger; R Raychoudhury; J H Werren; T Schmitt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Pheromone evolution and sexual behavior in Drosophila are shaped by male sensory exploitation of other males.

Authors:  Soon Hwee Ng; Shruti Shankar; Yasumasa Shikichi; Kazuaki Akasaka; Kenji Mori; Joanne Y Yew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High chemical diversity in a wasp pheromone: a blend of methyl 6-methylsalicylate, fatty alcohol acetates and cuticular hydrocarbons releases courtship behavior in the Drosophila parasitoid Asobara tabida.

Authors:  Johannes Stökl; Anna-Teresa Dandekar; Joachim Ruther
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Does early learning drive ecological divergence during speciation processes in parasitoid wasps?

Authors:  Kerstin König; Elena Krimmer; Sören Brose; Cornelia Gantert; Ines Buschlüter; Christian König; Seraina Klopfstein; Ingo Wendt; Hannes Baur; Lars Krogmann; Johannes L M Steidle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.