Literature DB >> 23407406

Balloon kyphoplasty versus KIVA vertebral augmentation--comparison of 2 techniques for osteoporotic vertebral body fractures: a prospective randomized study.

Panagiotis Korovessis1, Konstantinos Vardakastanis, Thomas Repantis, Vasilios Vitsas.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, parallel-group, controlled comparative randomized study.
OBJECTIVE: This study compares the efficacy in sagittal vertebral height and wedge deformity restoration, polymethylmethacrylate cement leakage safety, and functional outcome of balloon kyphoplasty (BK) versus KIVA (a novel vertebral augmentation technique) implant for the augmentation of fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures have been widely used to treat vertebral compression fractures caused by osteoporosis. The results of these trials are encouraging in augmenting the vertebra and reducing the wedge deformity. However, after BK, polymethylmethacrylate leakage remains common after A3.1 AO type fractures, with a frequency per vertebra into the epidural space up to 9.8% but less common (0.03%-5.6%) in A1.1 AO type fracture. KIVA is a novel percutaneous uniportal vertebral augmentation device that is designed to restore the vertebral body and reduce polymethylmethacrylate leakage.
METHODS: From a total 190 patients with osteoporotic fractures who were initially enrolled in this prospective randomized study, 10 patients were excluded (5 met exclusion criteria, 5 with evidence of metastasis). This study examined 82 patients (69 ± 11 yr) with 133 fractures who received KIVA and 86 patients (72 ± 9 yr) with 122 fractures that were reinforced with BK. Anterior (anterior vertebral body height ratio [AVBHr]), midline (midline vertebral body height ratio [MVBHr]), and posterior (posterior vertebral body height ratio [PVBHr]) vertebral body height ratio and Gardner segmental vertebral wedge deformity were measured preoperatively to postoperatively. New fractures were recorded at the final observation. The baseline anthropometric and roentgenographic parameters did not differ between the 2 groups. Any cement leakage was examined on plain roentgenograms and computed tomographic scan. All patients were followed for an average of 14 months (range, 13-15 mo) postoperatively. RESULTS.: At the final observation, both KIVA and BK restored significantly AVBHr, PVBHr, and MVBHr. However, only KIVA device reduced significantly the Gardner angle (P = 0.002). Residual kyphosis of more than 5° was measured significantly more (P < 0.001) in the BK than in KIVA spines. KIVA showed significantly lower (3%, χ2, P ≤ 0.05) leakage) [corrected] (paravertebral, intradiscal) rate per vertebra than BK (0.098%) in which because of intracanal leakage 2 patients developed acute paraplegia and were reoperated in emergency. New fracture rate was similar in both groups. Back pain scores (visual analogue scale), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (Physical Function and Mental Health domains), and Oswestry Disability Index scores improved significantly in the patients of both groups.
CONCLUSION: Both KIVA and BK restored in short-term similarly vertebral body height, but only KIVA restored vertebral body wedge deformity. KIVA was followed by significantly lower and harmless always extracanal leakage rate than BK. Longer observation is needed to show whether these radiological changes have any functional impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23407406     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826b3aef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of pain reduction and height restoration post vertebral augmentation using a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) polymer implant for the treatment of split (Magerl A2) vertebral fractures: a prospective, long-term, non-randomized study.

Authors:  Georgios Velonakis; Dimitrios Filippiadis; Stavros Spiliopoulos; Elias Brountzos; Nikolaos Kelekis; Alexis Kelekis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in Europe: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Carmen Bouza; Teresa López-Cuadrado; Nuria Almendro; José María Amate
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Less invasive reduction and fusion of fresh A2 and A 3 traumatic L 1-L 4 fractures with a novel vertebral body augmentation implant and short pedicle screw fixation and fusion.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Konstantinos Vardakastanis; Thomas Repantis; Vasilios Vitsas
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-30

4.  KIVA VCF system in the treatment of T12 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Marco Damilano; Matteo Pejrona; Olmo Consonni; Francesco Langella; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  PMMA embolization to the left dorsal foot artery during percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Panagiotis Iliopoulos; Iliopoulos Panagiotis; Panagiotis Korovessis; Korovessis Panagiotis; Vasilios Vitsas; Vitsas Vasilios
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Transpedicular vertebral body augmentation reinforced with pedicle screw fixation in fresh traumatic A2 and A3 lumbar fractures: comparison between two devices and two bone cements.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Konstantinos Vardakastanis; Thomas Repantis; Vasilios Vitsas
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-28

7.  In not only vertebroplasty but also kyphoplasty, the resolution of vertebral deformities depends on vertebral mobility.

Authors:  K Yokoyama; M Kawanishi; M Yamada; H Tanaka; Y Ito; M Hirano; T Kuroiwa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Risks and benefits of percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  O Lamy; B Uebelhart; B Aubry-Rozier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Review of Vertebral Augmentation: An Updated Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness.

Authors:  Douglas Beall; Morgan P Lorio; B Min Yun; Maria J Runa; Kevin L Ong; Christopher B Warner
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

10.  Clinical outcome after the use of a new craniocaudal expandable implant for vertebral compression fracture treatment: one year results from a prospective multicentric study.

Authors:  David Noriega; Antonio Krüger; Francisco Ardura; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Frank Hassel; Xavier Barreau; Jörg Beyerlein
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.