Literature DB >> 23407330

Conjugation of Monoclonal Antibodies to Super Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Detection of her2/neu Antigen on Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Fereshteh Shamsipour1, Amir Hassan Zarnani, Roya Ghods, Mahmood Chamankhah, Flora Forouzesh, Sedigheh Vafaei, Ali Ahmad Bayat, Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi, Mohammad Ali Oghabian, Mahmood Jeddi-Tehrani.   

Abstract

Conjugation of monoclonal antibodies to super paramagnetic nanoparticles is an effective method for cancer diagnosis and treatment. In this study the humanized anti her2/neu monoclonal antibody- Herceptin- was conjugated to super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles using EDC method. The concentration of the conjugated antibodies was measured by Bradford assay. The antibody-nanoparticle conjugates were incubated with SKBR-3 and T47D human breast carcinoma cell lines and the presence of the conjugates on cell surface was confirmed by Prussian blue iron staining method. Conjugation of Herceptin to SPIO resulted in a precipitate-free conjugate containing 20µg antibody/mg SPIO. Prussian blue iron-staining of cells showed successful binding of the conjugates to the cell surfaces. Conjugation of monoclonal antibodies to SPIO may be a useful method for detection of tumor cells, especially by MRI techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Conjugation; Herceptin; Nanomagnetic particles

Year:  2009        PMID: 23407330      PMCID: PMC3558121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol        ISSN: 2008-2835


Introduction

Molecular probes for biomolecular recognition are of great importance in the fields of chemistry, biology, medical sciences and in biotechnology as well. These probes have been used in studies of biological functions and in ultrasensitive detection of biological factors responsible for many diseases (1). On the other front, the developments of nontoxic and biocompatible magnetic particles have been disclosed for biological applications since mid-1980s (2). Recently, magnetic particles have attracted growing interest as high performance biomaterial which is used for transport and separation of cells or cell parts (2, 3), MRI (4), hyperthermia (5) and drug delivery (6). Bio-logical samples such as blood, serum, cell suspensions and cell lysates are allowed to be exposed to specific ligand-coupled particles, and the captured molecules or cells are then rapidly separated using magnetic fields (3, 7, 8). Magnetic particles conjugated with anti tumor monoclonal antibodies provide a new approach to identify tumor cells. Antibodies labeled with magnetic nano-particles give magnetic signals on exposure to a magnetic field. Iron oxide particles are usually coated with different organic shells including dextran, albumin or polyethylene glycol. Coated nanoparticles can be manufactured with a variety of functional groups (such as amino, aldehyde, hydroxyl, sulfate and carboxyl groups) on their surfaces. Considering these properties, we used super paramagnetic iron oxide (nanomag-D-SPIO 20nm) with COOH group on the surface, for conjugation to a humanized anti her2/neu monoclonal antibody (Herceptin) as a cancer targeting antibody.

Materials and Methods

Nanomag-D-SPIO 20 nm nanoparticles (surface COOH) and MACS separator with MS columns were purchased from Micromod (Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Germany). The breast carcinoma cell lines SKBR-3 and T47D were obtained from Pasteur Institute of Iran. Other reagents and chemicals were obtained from Merck and Sigma.

Conjugation of anti her2 antibody (Herceptin) with nanoparticles by EDC method

N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, 26mM) and 10 mM N-hydroxy succinimide (NHS) were dissolved in 0.1 M 2-(N-morpholino) ethane-sulfonic acid (MES) buffer (pH = 8.3). The mixture was added to 1 ml of 5 mg/ml nanomag-D-SPIO 20 nm nanoparticles, and shaken at room temperature for 2 hours. The particles were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH = 7.4 and then 0.5-1 mg/ml of Herceptin was added to the activated particles. The mixture was shaken for 3 hours and the reaction was quenched by the addition of glycine for 30 minutes (9, 10). The unconjugated antibodies were separated from conjugated antibodies by MACS column. The amount of immobilized antibody was estimated based on the Bradford method.

Spectrophotometric measurement of Iron

Iron concentration of conjugated samples was obtained by potassium thiocyanate method (12, 13). In brief, samples were diluted with 300 µl 6N HCl containing %1 H2O2; under this condition, the iron in the samples is dissolved and oxidized to ferric state. The samples were then added to a 5% solution of potassium thiocyanate where the Fe III formed a red complex with the thiocyanate which could be measured by absorbance at 480 nm.

Cell culture

The her2/neu expressing cell lines SKBR3 and T47D were grown in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum and %1 penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37°C containing 5% Co2.

Immunofluorescence staining

To verify the expression of her2 proteins on the cells, the SKBR3 and T47D cells were incubated with anti her2/neu (Herceptin) at 10 µg/ml concentration for 1 hour at 37°C. After being washed in PBS, FITC-labeled anti human IgG (diluted 1/20, Avicenna Research Institute, Tehran, Iran) was added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were then observed directly on a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan).

In vitro cell labeling

SKBR3 and T47D cells were counted and adjusted to a suspension of 4×105 cells/ml; 100 µl of each cell suspension were cyto-spined on microscope slides (Shandon cyto-spin 4, Thermo, Germany). The cells were incubated with 100 µl magnetic nanoparticles (with or without antibody; 5 µg Ab and 0.2 mg iron) for 1 hour at 37°C. Then cells were washed extensively with PBS to remove unbound particles. The nanoparticles that bounded on the cell surface were detected by iron staining with Prussian blue staining method (14, 15).

Results

We used 20nm nanoparticles (a magnetic core covered with dextran) with carboxyl group for conjugation to Herceptin as a cancer targeting antibody. The final products of conjugation were suspensions without precipitate and the amount of immobilized antibody was 20–36 µg Ab/mg nanoparticles (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Antibody concentration measurement by Bradford assay (Ab conc. 100 µg/ml)

Antibody concentration measurement by Bradford assay (Ab conc. 100 µg/ml) The amount of iron conjugated was determined by potassium thiocyanate method using FeCl3-6H2O as a reference (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Magnetic nanoparticles concentration measurement by Potassium Thiocyanate method (particles conc. 4-4.5mg/ml)

Magnetic nanoparticles concentration measurement by Potassium Thiocyanate method (particles conc. 4-4.5mg/ml) The SKBR3 and T47D cell lines showed high levels of her2/neu expression, after incubation with Herceptin-FITC (Figure 3), but not with the isotype control antibody (data not shown).
Figure 3

Light microscopy and Immunoflurescence of SKBR3 and T47D cell lines

A: SKBR3 cells in culture, B: suspension of SKBR3 cells, C: SKBR3 cells after incubation with Herceptin-FITC, D: T47D cells in culture, E: suspension of T47D cells, F: T47D cells after incubation with Herceptin- FITC.

Light microscopy and Immunoflurescence of SKBR3 and T47D cell lines A: SKBR3 cells in culture, B: suspension of SKBR3 cells, C: SKBR3 cells after incubation with Herceptin-FITC, D: T47D cells in culture, E: suspension of T47D cells, F: T47D cells after incubation with Herceptin- FITC. These results confirmed the presence of antigen on the cell surface. Specific binding of the conjugates to the cells can be determined by using electron microscopy, MRI imaging and iron staining (13, 18, 19). In this study after incubation of the cells with conjugated nanoparticles, the blue stain induced by iron staining showed the accumulation of conjugated nanoparticles on the cell surface (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Iron staining of cells after incubation with conjugated nanoparticles

A: SKBR3 cells, B: KBR3 with iron staining, C: T47D cells, D: with iron staining.

Iron staining of cells after incubation with conjugated nanoparticles A: SKBR3 cells, B: KBR3 with iron staining, C: T47D cells, D: with iron staining.

Discussion

Polymer-coated magnetic particles with particle sizes 5–500 nm have been employed in medicine or biotechnology for many years (16). In this study the 20 nm nanoparticles were coupled via their surface carboxyl group to the amino groups on the Herceptin antibody using the EDC method (10, 17). After conjugation, the amount of immobilized antibody was approximately 20 µg/mg magnetite. However by increasing concentration of antibody during the process, the efficiency of the conjugation did not improve. In other studies the efficiency of conjugation has been reported as 5–20 µg Ab/mg particles (9, 18). Conjugated nanoparticles bound specifically to the her2/neu antigen. Iron staining, confirmed the presence of nanoparticles on the cell surface. In the present study we showed specific binding of Herceptin-nanomagnetic particle conjugates to her2/neu over expressing cells, suggesting a future application of Herceptin-magnetite for MR imaging of breast cancer.
  13 in total

1.  Use of magnetic beads with immobilized monoclonal antibodies for isolation of highly pure plasma membranes.

Authors:  Erika L Lawson; James G Clifton; Feilei Huang; Xuesong Li; Douglas C Hixson; Djuro Josic
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  Nanotechnology, nanomedicine, and the development of new, effective therapies for cancer.

Authors:  Ernest S Kawasaki; Audrey Player
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.307

3.  Development of tumor targeting bioprobes ((111)In-chimeric L6 monoclonal antibody nanoparticles) for alternating magnetic field cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sally J DeNardo; Gerald L DeNardo; Laird A Miers; Arutselvan Natarajan; Alan R Foreman; Cordula Gruettner; Grete N Adamson; Robert Ivkov
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Conjugation of biomolecules with luminophore-doped silica nanoparticles for photostable biomarkers.

Authors:  S Santra; P Zhang; K Wang; R Tapec; W Tan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Magnetic labeling and cell sorting.

Authors:  C S Owen; N L Sykes
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1984-10-12       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Yong-Min Huh; Young-wook Jun; Jung-wook Seo; Jung-tak Jang; Ho-Taek Song; Sungjun Kim; Eun-Jin Cho; Ho-Geun Yoon; Jin-Suck Suh; Jinwoo Cheon
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-12-24       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T with immunospecific contrast agent in vitro and in vivo in a xenotransplant model.

Authors:  G Baio; M Fabbi; D de Totero; S Ferrini; M Cilli; L E Derchi; C E Neumaier
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Magnetite nanoparticle-loaded anti-HER2 immunoliposomes for combination of antibody therapy with hyperthermia.

Authors:  Akira Ito; Yuko Kuga; Hiroyuki Honda; Hiroyuki Kikkawa; Atsushi Horiuchi; Yuji Watanabe; Takeshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  MR imaging of the her2/neu and 9.2.27 tumor antigens using immunospecific contrast agents.

Authors:  Martin A Funovics; Barbara Kapeller; Christoph Hoeller; Henry S Su; Rainer Kunstfeld; Stephan Puig; Karin Macfelda
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Novel delivery approaches for cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Ashim K Mitra; Vibhuti Agrahari; Abhirup Mandal; Kishore Cholkar; Chandramouli Natarajan; Sujay Shah; Mary Joseph; Hoang M Trinh; Ravi Vaishya; Xiaoyan Yang; Yi Hao; Varun Khurana; Dhananjay Pal
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Nanoplatforms for magnetic resonance imaging of cancer.

Authors:  Monika A Cywińska; Ireneusz P Grudziński; Andrzej Cieszanowski; Michał Bystrzejewski; Magdalena Popławska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2011-04

3.  Incorporating gold nanoclusters and target-directed liposomes as a synergistic amplified colorimetric sensor for HER2-positive breast cancer cell detection.

Authors:  Yu Tao; Mingqiang Li; Bumjun Kim; Debra T Auguste
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Bovine Serum Albumin-Conjugated Ferrimagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles to Enhance the Biocompatibility and Magnetic Hyperthermia Performance.

Authors:  Viveka Kalidasan; Xiao Li Liu; Tun Seng Herng; Yong Yang; Jun Ding
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2015-10-15

5.  Isolation of HLA-G+ cells using MEM-G/9 antibody-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for prenatal screening: a reliable, fast and efficient method.

Authors:  Elaheh Emadi; Abdol-Khalegh Bordbar; Hamid Nadri; Ali Shams; Asghar Taheri-Kafrani; Seyed Mehdi Kalantar
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Specific detection of CD133-positive tumor cells with iron oxide nanoparticles labeling using noninvasive molecular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Chen; Gunn-Guang Liou; Huay-Ben Pan; Hui-Hwa Tseng; Yu-Ting Hung; Chen-Pin Chou
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-11-11

7.  Imaging of activated complement using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO)--conjugated vectors: an in vivo in utero non-invasive method to predict placental insufficiency and abnormal fetal brain development.

Authors:  G Girardi; J Fraser; R Lennen; R Vontell; M Jansen; G Hutchison
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 15.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.