Literature DB >> 22802828

Nanoplatforms for magnetic resonance imaging of cancer.

Monika A Cywińska1, Ireneusz P Grudziński, Andrzej Cieszanowski, Michał Bystrzejewski, Magdalena Popławska.   

Abstract

The application of biomedical nanotechnology in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is expect to have a major impact leading to the development of new contrast drug candidates on the nanoscale (1-100 nm) that are able to react with specific biological targets at a molecular level. One of the major challenges in this regard is the construction of nanomaterials, especially used in molecular MRI diagnostics of cancer in vivo, specialized antitumor drug delivery or real-time evaluation of the efficacy of the implemented cancer treatment. In this paper, we tried to gain further insights into current trends of nanomedicine, with special focus on preclinical MRI studies in translation cancer research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; nanocontrasts; nanomedicine; preclinical MRI

Year:  2011        PMID: 22802828      PMCID: PMC3389923     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pol J Radiol        ISSN: 1733-134X


Background

Despite a significant technological progress leading to advances in biomedical science and improvement of the current knowledge on cancer biology, cancers are still one of the most common causes of death, second only to cardiovascular diseases, both in Poland and worldwide. Early detection of neoplastic lesions developing in the body is a significant clinical problem affecting patient survival rates. In particular, detecting lesions at the molecular level might facilitate initiation of a proper treatment, including appropriate chemo- and radiotherapeutical strategies or appropriate surgical interventions [1]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role among numerous analytical techniques in clinical diagnostics. Due to systematic advances in image contrasting and MRI acquisition techniques and to the use of appropriately designed contrast agents, magnetic resonance imaging offers realistic chances for early detection of neoplastic lesions in vivo. This innovative approach to cancer diagnostics using the MRI techniques was possible due to the dynamic progress in bionanotechnology, particularly to the widespread applicability of nanomaterial-based contrast agents [2]. In near future, a comprehensive use of physicochemical and biological properties of nanoplatforms, including targeted nanocontrasts, will allow for the development of molecular magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) of tumors in humans and for an early detection of neoplastic lesions at the molecular level.

Nanomaterials

Nanomaterials manufactured in the nanotechnological industry are atomic clusters of 1–100 nm. They include both crystalline, and amorphous systems. With regard to the number of dimensions of the systems reduced to the nanoscale, nanomaterials are classified into zero-dimensional nanomaterials (three dimensions reduced to nanoscale – quantum dots, nanoparticles), one-dimensional nanomaterials (two dimensions reduced to nanoscale – so called „thin layers”) and two-dimensional nanomaterials (one dimension reduced to nanoscale, including e.g. nanotubes and nanorods) [3]. Miniaturization of materials to nanoscale dimensions is often accompanied by changes in the electron structure of these materials, which has an impact on their properties. In case of nanomaterials, a strong correlation between the dimensionality and physicochemical, optical or electric properties can be observed, e.g. due to quantum restrictions becoming apparent at sizes of one to several nanometers. This hinders the electron movements and leads to the formation of discrete energy levels that are dependent on the size of the nanoparticle [3]. Due to a high area-to-volume ratio, nanomaterials are characterized by a higher intracellular reactivity, as compared to systems obtained from the same compounds in micro- and macroscale, as reflected by their biological and, most probably, toxicological activity. Small dimensions of nanoscale materials allow them to reach sites that are potentially unaccessible for larger particles, as well as to engage in interactions on the molecular level. In case of magnetic nanoplatforms, this creates opportunities for the development of techniques for molecular resonance imaging of e.g. genes.

Nanoplatforms in Tumor Imaging

MRI nanoplatforms

Due to its high spatial and linear resolution and high tissue specificity, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for in vivo localization of neoplastic lesions in human body. In clinical practice, classic, paramagnetic gadolinium chelate contrast agents are used in ca. 30% of all scans in order to improve their diagnostic value. Scans acquired with such contrast agents are often insufficient and incomplete sources of information for clinicians. Thus, a need arose to develop novel contrast agents that would significantly enhance the diagnostic efficacy of MRI scans. Recently, radiologists have become interested in magnetic nanoplatforms. Application of these nanoplatforms in biomedical sector offers a possibility to improve diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of examinations. Magnetic nanoplatforms may shorten spin-lattice relaxation times (T1), leading to enhancement of signal intensity for the imaged tissues (positive contrasts) or spin-spin relaxation times (T2), leading to reduction of signal intensity for the imaged tissues (negative contrasts). Because to their small dimensions, nanoplatforms are preferentially accumulated within neoplastic tissues [4], rising hopes for molecular magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) of early neoplastic lesions. In the recent years, platforms for paramagnetic gadolinium contrasts, popular in clinical diagnostics, have been developed, allowing to use these lanthanide ions in nanomolar quantities for mMRI applications. This concept was used in the development of e.g. nanoparticle emulsions, dendrimers, micelles and liposomes with paramagnetic compounds attached for a significant enhancement of MRI signals [5,6]. Thus obtained gadolinium nanocontrasts in the form of surface-bound paramagnetic liposomes (Gd-DTPA-PE) or micelles containing gadolinium atoms (Gadofluorine 8) may be used in so-called magnetic resonance histology as agents allowing for differentiation of malignant lesions from benign hyperplasias in case of lymph node metastases. This allows for detection of even the smallest metastatic foci in lymph nodes, often not detectable in MRI scans acquired with traditional contrast agents [7]. Of wide interest as potential mMRI contrasts with dominant T2 effect are nanoparticles containing metals (e.g. Au, Re, Ag, Ni, Co) or iron oxides (Fe3O4). Research includes multifunctional contrast probes of class Au3Cu1 [8] or modified iron oxide nanoparticles of the group of superparamagnetic (SPIO) and ultrasuperparamagnetic (USPIO) iron oxides. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in dextran or carboxydextran shell, characterized by their affinity towards the reticulo-endothelial systems, are taken up by Kupffer cell-containing liver parenchymal cells, while not being accumulated in tumors devoid of Kupffer cells, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), thus enhancing the efficacy of MRI scans in detecting neoplastic lesions [9,10]. Nanoencapsulated USPIOs may be used for early diagnostics of prostate and rectal cancer, as well as for imaging of small aggregates of neoplastic cells in other organs [11,12]. Besides the preclinically tested metallic nanoparticle-based platforms, the search for future biosensors and contrast agents is also focused on quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, Au nanorods, etc. In light of the results obtained to date, one may suppose that quantum dots linked to hyaluronic acid might be useful for the monitoring of progression of neoplastic lesions, the progress of solid tumor treatment and visualization of lymphatic vessels [13,14]. In order to increase the number of probes penetrating into the tumor region and the enhancement of signal intensity, development of nanoplatforms characterized by smaller dimension is currently attempted. Nanoparticles used in traditional in vivo scans are ca. 15–30 nm in diameter. Literature sources contain reports of attempted development of nanoprobes with particle sizes smaller than 2 mm, such as InAs-ZnSe [15]. Considering the specific physicochemical properties of the obtained nanocontrasts and their enhanced toxicity potential in cellular environment, it is necessary that relevant toxicological studies, including toxicokinetic studies, are carried out before the tested nanoplatforms are used in phase I clinical studies. The recently observed trend to increase the number of nanoparticles penetrating into the tumor region by reducing the particle size is also associated with potential cytotoxic effects of the probes and their possible interactions with cellular DNA (particularly in case of nanoparticles of less than 2 nm in diameter) [16].

Functionalization of nanoplatforms

Nanoplatforms used in the biomedical sector have specific properties acquired in functionalization. Functionalization is associated with modification of the surface of nanomaterials, undertaken in order to facilitate binding of appropriate biomolecules to reactive functional groups in the nanoparticle shell, most commonly amine, carboxyl, hydroxyl, aldehyde or sulphate groups [17], which allows for the development of targeted carriers for therapeutic and/or diagnostic agents. Nanoplatforms are usually coated with high molecular mass polymers containing an appropriate number of reactive functional groups [18]. Compounds commonly used for this end include dextran, albumins, citric acid, chitosan, siloxane, polystyrene or polyethylene glycol (PEG) [17,18]. Modification consisting in the introduction of an organic shells improves the stability of nanoplatforms, enhances their biocompatibility and prevents their aggregation in the cellular environment, thus improving the pharmacokinetics of these platforms [19]. Shells facilitate the uptake of nanoplatforms into tumor cells, contribute to the reduction or elimination of protein adsorption, thus protecting nanoparticles from being quickly recognized by macrophages, and enhance the half-life of nanoplatforms in the circulatory system [20]. Appropriately designed shells may also have a protective function. For example, silica shells protect CdTe quantum dots from releasing toxic Cd2+ ions into the cellular environment [21]. In the most common reaction of functionalizing nanoplatform surfaces with polyethylene glycol, particles of PEG esters are linked to primary amine groups in the platforms, resulting in the formation of stable amide bonds [19]. Figure 1 presents an example of surface modification with polyethylene glycol.
Figure 1.

Modification of the nanoparticle surface with PEG.

Besides traditional methods of surface modifications associated with the use of polymeric organic compounds, plasmatic polymerization, allowing for generation of highly adherent and coherent layers for various substrates, has also been used since recently [22]. Due to the possibility to adjust the process parameters, it is possible to obtain shells of varied thickness and characterized by specific physicochemical properties in order to be potentially used in magnetic biological probes [22]. Of special note is the development of technology to obtain magnetic nanoparticles coated with tight shells of graphene monolayers. These processes make use of thermal decomposition of carbon-carrying materials (e.g. by laser beams) with simultaneous deposition of generated carbon on previously prepared nanoparticles [23]. Plasmatic techniques are also used for generation of these nanomaterials. Metal- and carbon-containing gases are formed in the plasma, where temperatures exceed 3,000 K. Subsequent cooling of the gas leads to its condensation in the form of nanoparticles coated with graphite coating, i.e. carbon nanocapsules (Figure 2) [24]. Superparamagnetic metal-carbon nanoplatforms obtained by means of plasmatic techniques may soon contribute, after appropriate biomodification, to the development of targeted MRI contrasts.
Figure 2.

A model of a carbon nanocapsule and a microscopic photo (scanning electron microscope – SEM) of the carbon nanocapsule.

Targeted nanoplatforms

Linking of biomolecules to nanoparticle surfaces is associated with broadening their applicability. Individual ligands are usually bound to amine or carboxyl groups present within the structure of the polymer shell of the contrast agent. Thus obtained nanoplatforms are characterized by affinity to appropriate surface receptors, vascular adhesion molecules, ion channels or genes [24-27], which facilitates their application in e.g. targeted transport of therapeutic agents or magnetic resonance imaging of gene expression, dynamic physiological processes or neoplastic lesions. Table 1 presents the most common groups of biomolecules linked to the surfaces of nanomatrices.
Table 1.

A group of typical biomolecules linked to the nanoplatform surface [based on 28,29].

Biofragments linked to nanoplatform surfaces
Low-molecular ligandsProteinsPeptides

Folic acid

Dimercaptosuccinic acid

Transferrin

BSA

Fibrinogen

Thrombin

Lecithin

Cytokines

Streptavidin

Monoclonal antibodies

RGD

LHRD

PolysaccharidesPolyunsaturated fatty acidsAptamers

Hyaluronic acid

Chitosan

Dextran

Heparin

Oligosaccharides

Palmitic acid

Phospholipids

siRNA

DNA

Plasmids

High-specialization optical or MRI contrasts obtained by the attachment of ligands complementary to specific molecular targets allow for a significant improvement in the efficacy of non-invasive diagnostics of cancer lesions. Studies of targeted T2-dependent nanocontrasts conducted with a MRI scanner with magnetic induction of 3T confirmed accumulation of studied nanoplatforms in the tumor region, reduction in signal intensity within the accumulation region and low uptake into liver and spleen [30]. High affinity to spleen tumor cells was also confirmed in the studies of specialized conjugates of Au nanoparticles with F19 monoclonal antibodies [1], confirming the plausibility of using the targeting ligands. The use of various address molecules, including folic acid, recombinant peptides containing N-terminal uPA fragment or EPPT1 peptides specific to the uMUC-1 antigen (early tumor marker) allowed for the development of efficient contrast media for the diagnostics of colon [31] or breast cancer [32-33]. The improvement in the stability of linked antibodies or peptides [34] and the affinity of biological ligands presented on polymeric nanoplatform surfaces [35] remain significant issues. Among proposed solutions, the concept to use dendrimeric skeletons as platforms appears very interesting. Besides the advantage of significant enhancement in the affinity to linked molecules [35], such skeletons may also be used as carriers for therapeutic agents (multimodal platforms).

Multimodal nanoplatforms

Another stage of nanoplatform development is the design of systems based on combination of different nanomaterials, allowing for making simultaneous use of the advantages of individual constituents. The above concept was developed from the need to construct bimodal contrast media allowing for the imaging of tumors using both MRI and optical techniques. To date, optical techniques are inferior to MRI techniques due to their limitations associated e.g. with tissue penetration. From the perspective of in vivo diagnostics, optical contrasts have an important potential for application in studies of cancer metastasis [36,37] or in long-term monitoring of cell transfer [38,39]. The current challenge to scientists is to develop optimum strategies for preparation of multifunctional nanoparticles characterized by pre-defined composition, homogenous surface modification and reproducible functionality to deliver therapeutic agents to specific regions and simultaneously facilitate monitoring of neoplastic lesions by MRI. Two procedures have been successfully employed: molecular functionalization (associated with linking of proteins, monoclonal antibodies and fluorescent probes to appropriately modified magnetic nanoparticle surfaces) and integration of magnetic nanoparticles with other functional nanoelements, such as quantum dots (QDs). This strategy allowed for preparation of heterodimeric structures used e.g. in optical and magnetic resonance imaging of neoplastic lesions, such as EGFRA-Fe3O4-Au conjugates used in mMRI [40]. Various types of links are discussed for functional conjugates of magnetic nanoparticles and quantum dots. Table 2 lists the proposed solutions.
Table 2.

Types of functional conjugations of nanoparticles and quantum dots [based on 41].

Functional conjugates of nanoparticles and quantum dots (QDs)
Integrated nanoplatformsHeterostructural platforms or core-and-coating platformsQuantum dots doped with paramagnetic ionsQuantum dots coated with gadolinium chelates
EXAMPLES:

Fe2O3 nanoplatforms combined with QDs (CdSe/ZnS) in silica spheres;

Fe3O4and γ-Fe2O3 mixtures in silica spheres

EXAMPLES:

Cobalt cores with CdSe coating

FePt-CdS heterodimers obtained from heating of primary FePt/CdS platforms;

Fe2O3 with CdSe quantum dots and silica coating

EXAMPLES:

CdS: Mn/Zn with potential application in brain tumor imaging

Ferromagnetic ZnO: Mn2+ and ZnO: Co2+ probes with potential applications in the development of appropriate T2-dependent contrast materials are currently under research.

EXAMPLES:

Type A – QDs directly covered in chelate coating, e.g. QDs encapsulated within micelles formed form paramagnetic (Gd-DTPA-BSA) and pegylated lipids (PEG-DSPE), streptavidin-coated QDs with tethered RGD, annexin A5 or Gd-DTPA molecules;

Type B – platforms obtained by introduction of an intermediate layer between the QD and the paramagnetic coating in order to increase the area and number of tethered chelates, e.g. CdSe/ZnS with silica coating and tethered with Gd-DOTA molecules; CdS: Mn/ZnS with silica coating and tethered with paramagnetic Gd chelates.

Other types of links are also considered in the research of nanoplatforms for in vivo neoplastic lesion imaging. As part of their research, Josephson’s team have obtained conjugates of SPIO with fluorescent cyanine dye Cy5.5 and of CLIO with Cy5.5 or Cy7 [37]. Using quantum dots and iron compounds such as Fe2O3 or FePt, bimodal nanoparticles allowing for acquisition of T2-dependent images for lymph node mapping were developed. However, this solution is associated with the problem of low sensitivity of iron nanoparticles compared to the fluorescent particles, requiring a larger number of particles to penetrate into the tissue. This might hinder the use of quantum dots as carriers. A solution to this problem was found in the studies by Mulder et al., who attempted to link paramagnetic gadolinium ions to the surface of quantum dots, obtaining promising positive contrast materials [37]. Studies of bimodal nanoplatforms formed of quantum dots encapsulated in paramagnetic micelles for potential applications in detection of angiogenic processes in in vivo experimental models are also under way [42]. To date, heterophasic FePt-Au nanoparticles were also obtained and successfully used for in vitro imaging of neuroblastoma cells with overexpression of PSA carbohydrate associated with the growth and metastasis of tumor cells [43]. Various functional groups are linked to the surface of quantum dots, which allows for preparation of “intelligent” nanoplatforms to be used both in magnetic resonance and optical imaging, and in targeted cancer therapy. QD surfaces were functionalized with e.g. inorganic Au and CdTe particles [44] and biomolecules of modified proteins [45] or DNA, obtaining multimodal nanohybrids. Platforms obtained from linking monoclonal antibodies to Fe2O3 nanoparticle cores coated with polymer shells and surrounded by CdSe-ZnS found, their use e.g. in the imaging of breast cancer cells [15]. However, due to high toxicity of free Cd2+ ions, intensive research is under way to develop cadmium-free quantum dots. In line with the above concept, InP/ZnS nanoplatforms were developed. Following appropriate surface modification and linkage of monoclonal antibodies, these platforms may be used for diagnostic imaging and early detection of neoplastic lesions [46]. Coating of metallic nanoparticles with oligonucleotide shells is an innovative technique of preparing multimodal contrast materials [18]. The conducted tests have shown superiority of this type of conjugates over conventional probes used in biodetection systems to detect protein markers of neoplastic lesions [47]. Plasticity of thus obtained nanoplatforms, manifested by their capability to bind various ligands (aptamers), was confirmed in the studies of Au nanoparticles. Aptamers are nucleic acids or peptides (including folates, EGF, and antibodies) characterized by high selectivity and affinity towards molecular targets, and therefore constituting ideal probes for molecular imaging [48]. Since oligonucleotides may be unstable and decompose in the cellular environment, in vivo application of these oligonucleotides poses a considerable technological challenge. The legitimacy of the concept of using aptamer-based nanoplatforms for in vitro studies was confirmed by tests in which conjugates of Au nanoparticles and aptamers were used for quantitative analysis of cellular ATP [48]. Therefore, the method of coating nanoparticles with oligonucleotide shells offers new possibilities for preparation of efficient contrasts for mMRI imaging. Despite its many unquestionable advantages, the technology in question requires further advancements in order to increase the surface stability of molecules and achieve better control of the binding direction, which might lead e.g. to changes in antibody conformation, resulting in potential reduction in the affinity to the molecular target [18]. A real opportunity for the development of imaging tools for neoplastic lesions is offered by the technology of bimodal molecular probes. This strategy was used e.g. in preparation of nanoplatforms consisting of Fe3O4 nanocrystals with radionuclides and monoclonal antibodies [49]. Thus obtained nanoprobes improve the quality of images acquired by means of MRI, PET and SPECT by complementing the imperfections of these diagnostic techniques. In light of the obtained results, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may be another potential diagnostic tool, as their accumulation is associated with a reduction in patient survival in case of certain tumors [34]. It is therefore necessary to develop effective and non-invasive methods for labeling and localizing TAMs within the system. Studies of in vivo cell detection, including detection of macrophages, are currently conducted in animal models [34]. Successful results of tests were obtained for nanoplatforms including bimodal magnetofluorescent emulsions, PFC nanoemulsions containing fluorine isotope 19F [50] or non-toxic nanoemulsions of perfluoropolyethers (PFPE) [51]. Considering the established efficacy of these multimodal nanoplatforms, they might also prove useful in the studies of cellular therapy of neurodegenerative, autoimmune and neoplastic diseases [51].

Therapognostic nanoplatforms

Therapognostic matrices allow for tumor imaging and targeted transport of therapeutic agents with simultaneous in vivo monitoring of the location of these agents using MRI, CPECT/CT and PET/CT techniques. Thus, therapognostic matrices may be used for non-invasive assessment of the efficacy of treatment, as well as for studying biodistribution of therapeutic agents in order to establish optimum dosage levels [52]. Considering the varied nature of the components, adjustment of the diagnostic dose of the contrast agent and the therapeutic dose of the carried drug is a significant problem. Inappropriate ratio of individual components is associated with the risk of acute toxicity symptoms, lack of therapeutic effect, poor contrast [52] or, in case of radiopharmaceuticals, patient’s exposure to a harmful dose of ionizing radiation. Currently proposed compromise solution consists in the use of SPIO nanoparticles and AU nanoshells or nanorods [52]. Functionalization of matrices and attachment of appropriate molecules leading to reduction in organ-specific and systemic toxicity may also be useful when adjusting doses necessary for the proper effect of these matrices. Future plans include combination of nanoplatforms with prodrugs and radiation-activated therapeutic agents, allowing for their accumulation and activation at target sites with simultaneous reduction of harmful effects in the remaining tissues. Therapognostic platforms are already used in thermoablation, siRNA gene therapy or targeted drug transport [52].

Nanoplatforms for MRI-guided gene therapy

A new class of “therapeutic agents” with potential application in gene therapy and tumor magnetic resonance imaging are synthetic sequences of short interfering RNA (siRNA), which have recently become subjects of tests as being capable of interacting with mRNA and silencing the activity of functional genes [53]. Since the success of the therapy depends mostly on precise delivery of the sequence to the desired tissue, it is necessary to develop efficient strategies and carriers for the targeted transport of such molecules. Due to the potential immunotoxic properties of siRNA, associated with the release of cytokines [53], it is important to develop effective carriers that would reduce the toxicity of sequences introduced into the system. One of solutions to this problem may consist in encapsulation of siRNA in hollow nanoparticles and coating the nanoparticle surface with PEG, thus increasing the uptake of platforms by neoplastic cells due to the EPR effect without any immunotoxic effects [54]. Suitable nanoplatforms capable of delivering and releasing siRNA, as confirmed by in vivo studies, include highly efficient single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) (nano)transporters with phospholipid-functionalized surfaces (siRNA attached by cleavable disulphide bonds) [55], liposome-polycation-DNA (LPD) complex LPD-PEG-AA nanoparticles (prepared from DSGLA), effectively delivering siRNA to lung cancer cells and considered to be a potential anticancer drugs [56], Au nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles or quantum dots [57]. Interfering particles (iNOPs), silencing genes at clinically acceptable dosage levels, are currently studied as novel systemic agents [58]. The use of nanostructural contrast agents as carriers for effective intracellular transport of siRNA allows to monitor their efficacy as vectors and the progress of the treatment process (mMRI). Specific properties of nanoplatforms allow their application for in vivo visualization of carriers, determination of the efficacy of siRNA transport and evaluation of treatment efficacy by means of optical and/or MRI techniques (e.g. heterophasic iron oxide nanoparticles in dextran shells with Cy5.5 fluorescent cyanine dye molecules attached) [59]. The uptake of nanoparticles by the reticulo-endothelial system suggests the need to functionalize the surface of nanoplatforms and to attach appropriate molecules increasing the binding of these platforms to tumor cells.

Nanoplatforms for MRI-guided thermoablation

Thermoablation is associated with death of cancer cells in response to local treatment with temperatures of ca. 46°C. The thermal energy is generated directly in the cell, e.g. by appropriately designed nanoplatforms, following their excitation by a magnetic field with the frequency range of 0.5–5 MHz, laser radiation or ultrasounds. In case of nanoparticles, the efficacy of the treatment requires precise delivery of an appropriate quantity of these nanoparticles to the pathological tissue region, without damaging healthy structures. Thermoablation properties are characteristic mainly for metallic nanoplatforms. Based on the preclinical studies, apoptosis of cells overexpressing appropriate receptors was observed in the model of human breast carcinoma xenografts in mice, where iron oxide nanoparticles labeled by monoclonal antibodies were used [60,61]. Thermoablation properties were also observed in case of spherical nanoparticles designed on the basis of silica coated by a thin layer of gold, capable of transforming near infrared light energy into heat [62], and in case of SWCNTs with appropriately modified surfaces [63]. Also obtained in line with the above concept were gold (Au) “nanocages”, capable of generating heat under near infrared radiation [64], and Au nanorods with potential application as contrast agents in laser ablation therapy [65]. The obtained results allow to conclude that it is possible to use appropriately designed magnetic nanoparticles in ablation treatment of neoplastic lesion with simultaneous evaluation of the efficacy of such treatment by MRI techniques.

Nanoplatforms and angiogenesis

The key stage in the development and metastasis of tumor lesions is the formation of a network of vessels supplying oxygen and nutrients to the neoplastic tissue (angiogenesis). Since angiogenic activity is directly related to the degree of tumor malignancy, its non-invasive detection and quantitative analysis may be of help in MRI diagnostics and the assessment of disease progression. The use of molecular MRI imaging for characterization of the neovascularization process allows to monitor the efficacy of treatment by assessing the degree of expression of endothelial angiogenic factors before and after treatment. This concept is implemented by e.g. perfluorocarbon (PFC) emulsions, micelles, or liposomes with linked peptides, antibodies and peptidomimetics, used for evaluation of expression of αvβ3 integrin receptors [66]. Molecular imaging is also helpful in identification of tumors with low levels of neovascularization, which might poorly respond to antiangiogenic treatment [66]. Angiogenic activity of tumors may be assessed by 3D MRI using e.g. cNGR-tagged quantum dots [67]. Potential molecular targets for in vivo diagnostics of neoplastic lesions include integrin αvβ3, present in the newly formed endothelial cells and in some solid tumors [68,69], integrin α5β1 [66], receptor VEGF-R2 or factor VII [70]. Among the developed mMRI nanoplatforms, successful applications were found for T1-dependent contrasts, including paramagnetic liposomes docking at the RGD active site of the transmembrane αvβ3 receptors and T2-dependent USPIO and SPIO contrasts functionalized with organic coatings, such as APTMS (3-methylpropylotri-methoxysilane) [71], dextran and its derivatives, PEG, siloxane, polystyrene, citric acid or peptides, docking at integrin active sites [2,72]. Studies conducted to date have shown that the use of platforms with ligands docking at two molecular targets, e.g.. αvβ3 and α5β1, significantly increase the efficacy of anti-angiogenic cancer treatments [66]. The development of appropriate contrasts facilitates targeted transport of therapeutic agents to the tumor tissue and the estimation of their efficacy. Evaluation of angiogenesis advancement by means of mMRI may also prove helpful in appropriate treatment selection. Neovascularization exceeding a certain predefined threshold may justify the risk associated with chemo- or radiotherapy in case of small tumors, particularly of colon, lung or breast tumors [66].

Nanoplatforms as drug carriers

Non-specific distribution of drugs, leading to an increased risk of harmful systemic effects, is a significant problem in cancer treatment today. The use of appropriately designed nanomaterials facilitates the development of carriers that provide targeted transport of therapeutic agents and controlled release of these agents form the matrices within the pathological tissue [73]. The goals of appropriate modifications of nanoplatforms include extension of half-life in the circulatory system, enhancement of stability in physiological conditions and reduction of immunogenic and toxic effects. Platforms for targeted transport of drugs, particular chemotherapeutics, include polymeric nanoparticles [74-75], including hollow, porous Fe3O4 nanoparticles carrying cisplatin [75], fullerenes [76], dendrimers carrying paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil [77], carbon nanotubes (methotrexate) [78], nanoliposomes (citarabine, amphotericin B, doxorubicine – commercially available) [76], or polymeric nanomicelles [79]. Depending on the type of matrix, therapeutic agents are placed inside the matrix (e.g. encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs inside dendrimers [77]) or tethered to the surface of the matrix. Biocompatible and biodegradable platforms are preferred, such as polymeric PLA or PLGA particles [80]. Most recent studies focus on constructions based on the controlled release of active substances in response to a change in the pH of the environment (i.e. the acidity accompanying pathological conditions in the affected tissue) [73] and multimodal matrices with specific magnetic resonance or optical properties allowing for real-time, precise localization of the drug within the system [78,81] by means of magnetic resonance or optical techniques, respectively, which would allow to control the effectiveness of transport and the efficacy of the treatment in vivo.

Nanoplatforms for stem cell transfer

Stem cell transplantation therapy makes use of the specific properties of stem cells (SCs) associated with their ability to differentiate into muscle, nerve, cartilage or bone marrow cells. Thus, stem cell therapy offers a chance to develop regeneration techniques for the treatment of e.g. kidney insufficiency [82], myocardial damages [39] and neuronavigation of the transfer of neuronal SCs used in the pioneering therapy of multiform glioblastoma in humans [83]. Real-time imaging capability is important for the assessment of treatment efficacy and understanding of the mechanism of stem cell functions. Potential markers for the transferred agents include appropriately designed magnetic and optical nanomaterials. Besides in vivo monitoring of stem cells, nanotechnological platforms are also used in the studies of their long-term functionality and, since recently, also in manipulating the direction of stem cell differentiation [84,85]. Popular markers for the transferred SCs include USPIO nanoparticles [39,86-87], perfluorocarbon nanoparticles [86], quantum dots [39] and radioactive indium (111In) tags [39]. In near future, appropriately designed markers might be additionally used as drug carriers, facilitating simultaneous treatment, imaging and monitoring of the tissue by means of MRI [39].

Conclusions

The abundance of forms and specific physicochemical properties of manufactured nanomaterials justifies their dynamic expansion and widespread use in many areas of medicine. Thanks to the trend of designing functional hybrid magnetic nanomaterials submitted to multidirectional functionalization, as observed in recent years, it became possible to make an effective use of their wide applicability in the imaging of neoplastic lesions in vivo. Multimodal nanoplatforms offer a potential for the development of reliable methods of early molecular detection of cancers by making use of e.g. genetic profiling of biomarkers by applying multimodal nanoplatforms as targeted contrast agents for MRI techniques. Further development of specialized nanotechnology products and adaptation of these products in the biomedical sector offers realistic chances for overcoming current limitations in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Thanks to innovative methods of functionalization of nanostructural matrices, it will soon be possible to use these matrices in magnetic resonance imaging of cancer stem cells (CSCs) or in individualized therapies based on e.g. characteristic genomic, proteomic or metabolomic profiles of patients. Appropriately designed biocompatible nanoplatforms with long half-lives might be used in long-term in vivo monitoring in high risk patients in order to detect neoplastic lesions by means of mMRI techniques. The development of nanoimaging techniques is undoubtedly associated with the amount of research work required to design these specialized matrices; however, the wide array of diagnostic, therapeutic and analytical possibilities offered by these techniques is a sufficient motivation for researchers to engage in such studies.
  73 in total

1.  Multiplexed detection of protein cancer markers with biobarcoded nanoparticle probes.

Authors:  Savka I Stoeva; Jae-Seung Lee; Jennifer E Smith; Steven T Rosen; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Gene expression and gene therapy imaging.

Authors:  Claire Rome; Franck Couillaud; Chrit T W Moonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: design, synthesis, and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Jinhao Gao; Hongwei Gu; Bing Xu
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Surface functionalization of nanomaterials with dendritic groups: toward enhanced binding to biological targets.

Authors:  Amanda L Martin; Bo Li; Elizabeth R Gillies
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Carbon nanotubes as multifunctional biological transporters and near-infrared agents for selective cancer cell destruction.

Authors:  Nadine Wong Shi Kam; Michael O'Connell; Jeffrey A Wisdom; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Technological advances in renal replacement therapy: five years and beyond.

Authors:  Anjay Rastogi; Allen R Nissenson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Design, synthesis, and characterization of pH-sensitive PEG-PE conjugates for stimuli-sensitive pharmaceutical nanocarriers: the effect of substitutes at the hydrazone linkage on the ph stability of PEG-PE conjugates.

Authors:  Amit A Kale; Vladimir P Torchilin
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage.

Authors:  Evelyn K F Yim; Stella W Pang; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  A novel type of dual-modality molecular probe for MR and nuclear imaging of tumor: preparation, characterization and in vivo application.

Authors:  Shujie Liu; Bing Jia; Ruirui Qiao; Zhi Yang; Zilin Yu; Zhaofei Liu; Kan Liu; Jiyun Shi; Han Ouyang; Fan Wang; Mingyuan Gao
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.