Literature DB >> 23405942

Finite element analysis of the biomechanical interaction between coronary sinus and proximal anchoring stent in coronary sinus annuloplasty.

Thuy Pham1, Milton Deherrera, Wei Sun.   

Abstract

Recent clinical studies of the percutaneous transvenous mitral annuloplasty (PTMA) devices have shown a short-term reduction of mitral regurgitation after implantation. However, adverse events associated with the devices such as compression and perforation of vessel branches, device migration and fracture were reported. In this study, a finite element analysis was carried out to investigate the biomechanical interaction between the proximal anchor stent of a PTMA device and the coronary sinus (CS) vessel in three steps including: (i) the stent release and contact with the CS wall, (ii) the axial pull t the stent connector and (iii) the pressure inflation of the vessel wall. To investigate the impact of the material properties of tissues and stents on the interactive responses, the CS vessel was modelled with human and porcine material properties, and the proximal stent was modelled with two different Nitinol materials with one being stiffer than the other. The results indicated that the vessel wall stresses and contact forces imposed by the stents were much higher in the human model than the porcine model. However, the mechanical differences induced by the two stent types were relatively small. The softer stent exhibited a better fatigue safety factor when deployed in the human model than in the porcine model. These results underscored the importance of the CS tissue mechanical properties. Vessel wall stress and stent radial force obtained in the human model were higher than those obtained in the porcine model, which also brought up questions as to the validity of using the porcine model to assess device mechanical function. The quantification of these biomechanical interactions can offer scientific insight into the development and optimisation of the PTMA device design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monarc; PTMA stent; coronary vein; minimally invasive; mitral valve repair; tissue–stent interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23405942      PMCID: PMC3692591          DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.758719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  31 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of mitral regurgitation in a population-based sample (the Strong Heart Study).

Authors:  E C Jones; R B Devereux; M J Roman; J E Liu; D Fishman; E T Lee; T K Welty; R R Fabsitz; B V Howard
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Cardiac veins: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marios Loukas; Samuel Bilinsky; Esther Bilinsky; Abraham el-Sedfy; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial.

Authors:  A Kastrati; J Mehilli; J Dirschinger; F Dotzer; H Schühlen; F J Neumann; M Fleckenstein; C Pfafferott; M Seyfarth; A Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications.

Authors:  E A Grossi; J D Goldberg; A LaPietra; X Ye; P Zakow; M Sussman; J Delianides; A T Culliford; R A Esposito; G H Ribakove; A C Galloway; S B Colvin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation?

Authors:  A M Gillinov; P N Wierup; E H Blackstone; E S Bishay; D M Cosgrove; J White; B W Lytle; P M McCarthy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Percutaneous valve repair for mitral regurgitation using the Carillon Mitral Contour System. Description of the method and case report.

Authors:  Tomasz Siminiak; Ludwik Firek; Olga Jerzykowska; Piotr Kałmucki; Maciej Wołoszyn; Piotr Smuszkiewicz; Rafał Link
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.108

7.  Patient-specific AAA wall stress analysis: 99-percentile versus peak stress.

Authors:  L Speelman; E M H Bosboom; G W H Schurink; F A M V I Hellenthal; J Buth; M Breeuwer; M J Jacobs; F N van de Vosse
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Peak wall stress measurement in elective and acute abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Michael S Heng; Michael J Fagan; Jason W Collier; Grishma Desai; Peter T McCollum; Ian C Chetter
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts.

Authors:  C Kleinstreuer; Z Li; C A Basciano; S Seelecke; M A Farber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Percutaneous mitral valve annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation: first in man experience with a temporary implant.

Authors:  Olivier Dubreuil; Arsène Basmadjian; Anique Ducharme; Bernard Thibault; Jacques Crepeau; Jules Y T Lam; Luc Bilodeau
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.