Literature DB >> 23405879

Association between health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer screening.

Rohan Mahabaleshwarkar1, Rahul Khanna, Donna West-Strum, Yi Yang.   

Abstract

Conflicting information currently exists about the role played by health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in influencing colorectal cancer screening. The current study aimed to determine the relationship between HRQOL and colorectal cancer screening, using nationally representative public data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The 2010 BRFSS data were used for this study. Individuals younger than age 50 years were excluded from the study. Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation technique. Multiple multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to the data to determine the association between different components of HRQOL (physical HRQOL, mental HRQOL, activity limitation caused by poor mental or physical HRQOL, and general health status) and receipt of colorectal cancer screening tests (fecal occult blood testing [FOBT] in the past year, sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years, and colonoscopy in the past 10 years). The study sample comprised 301,488 individuals. Approximately 12% of the respondents had received FOBT in the past year, 62.6% had received sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years, or colonoscopy in the past 10 years, and 65.4% had received either of the screening tests within appropriate time frames. After controlling for demographic and health-related covariates, an inverse relationship was observed between HRQOL and colorectal cancer screening with the exception of mental HRQOL and FOBT. The relationship between mental HRQOL and FOBT was found to be nonsignificant. Policy makers should consider including HRQOL as an important parameter when designing interventions aimed at improving colorectal cancer screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23405879     DOI: 10.1089/pop.2012.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Health Manag        ISSN: 1942-7891            Impact factor:   2.459


  5 in total

1.  The relationship between four health-related quality-of-life indicators and use of mammography and Pap test screening in US women.

Authors:  Pranav K Gandhi; William M Gentry; Jeffery L Kibert; Erica Y Lee; Whitney Jordan; Michael B Bottorff; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Racial Disparities and Factors Affecting Michigan Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Vincent Grzywacz; Nasir Hussain; Neli Ragina
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-11-03

3.  Serum Unsaturated Free Fatty Acids: A Potential Biomarker Panel for Early-Stage Detection of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yaping Zhang; Chengyan He; Ling Qiu; Yanmin Wang; Xuzhen Qin; Yujie Liu; Zhili Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Why Do Some People Choose Opportunistic Rather Than Organized Cancer Screening? The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012.

Authors:  Myung-Il Hahm; Hsueh-Fen Chen; Thaddeus Miller; Liam O'Neill; Hoo-Yeon Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on quality of life.

Authors:  M F Bath; D Sidloff; A Saratzis; M J Bown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.939

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.