Literature DB >> 23405360

Draft Genome Sequence of Fructophilic Lactobacillus florum.

Eun Bae Kim1, Charlotte A Tyler, Lauren M Kopit, Maria L Marco.   

Abstract

Herein we report the first genome sequence for Lactobacillus florum. L. florum 2F was isolated from Valencia orange leaves and is fructophilic, like other strains of this species. The draft genome of L. florum 2F contains 1,261,842 bp with a G+C content of 41.5% in 46 contigs (≥500 bp).

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23405360      PMCID: PMC3569364          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00025-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

In 2010, the species Lactobacillus florum was first described for novel bacterial isolates originating from peony and bietou flowers in South Africa (1, 2). Several other L. florum strains have since been isolated from grapes and wine (3). L. florum is most closely related to Lactobacillus lindneri and Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, but it differs from these species because L. florum is fructophilic and exhibits a preference for d-fructose but not d-glucose, a primary carbon source for most lactobacilli (2). Strain 2F was isolated along with other lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from the leaves and (un)ripe fruits of (semi)tropical plants in California, including cactus, rose apple, tangelo, and Valencia orange. Most of the 79 L. florum isolates recovered exhibited a growth preference for fructose rather than glucose on MRS agar. L. florum 2F was among the isolates from Valencia orange leaves. This strain was selected for genome sequencing because it exhibited the most common random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR genotype pattern shared among the L. florum isolates recovered from plants. To prepare genomic DNA, one colony of L. florum 2F was inoculated into 5 ml of fructose-containing MRS broth and incubated at 30°C for 12 h. L. florum cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min and then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Genomic DNA was then purified using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). A 500-bp insert library was constructed for paired-end 100-bp sequencing (2 × 100 bp). The library was sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2000 at the UC Davis Genome Center (Davis, CA). The sequences were quality filtered, resulting in 1,056 Mbp representing an 837.2-fold coverage of the genome. The reads were then assembled by Velvet 1.2.07 (4) with a k-mer size of 31 bp to generate 46 contigs (≥500 bp; total length, 1,261,842 bp; N50 length, 59,916 bp; average length, 27,431 bp; G+C content, 41.5%). A total of 1,190 coding sequences (CDS) and 18 tRNAs were predicted by Rapid Annotation Using Subsystem Technology (RAST) (5). The strain lacks known genetic loci coding for antibiotic resistance based on comparisons to 22,190 genes in the Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database (6). We detected four clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated genes (cas1, cas2, and one SAG0894 and SAG0897 family gene), which indicates that the L. florum has an acquired immunity against foreign genetic elements (for example, bacteriophages) as found for other LAB species (7). Two genes encoding fructokinase and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, essential for fructose metabolism, are present and highly conserved (76% and 74% nucleotide identities, respectively) when compared to L. sanfranciscensis (8). Genes for utilizing plant cell wall degradation products such as arabinose and xylose are lacking, unlike those of other plant-associated LAB (e.g., Lactococcus lactis KF147) (1, 9). These genetic comparisons are useful for understanding the adaptations of LAB to plant-associated environments.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number ALXF00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ALXF01000000.
  9 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of Lactobacillus florum strains isolated from South African grape and wine samples.

Authors:  Phillip S Mtshali; Benoit Divol; Maret du Toit
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Comparative analysis of CRISPR loci in lactic acid bacteria genomes.

Authors:  Philippe Horvath; Anne-Claire Coûté-Monvoisin; Dennis A Romero; Patrick Boyaval; Christophe Fremaux; Rodolphe Barrangou
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis KF147, a plant-associated lactic acid bacterium.

Authors:  Roland J Siezen; Jumamurat Bayjanov; Bernadet Renckens; Michiel Wels; Sacha A F T van Hijum; Douwe Molenaar; Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Lactobacillus florum sp. nov., a fructophilic species isolated from flowers.

Authors:  Akihito Endo; Yuka Futagawa-Endo; Mitsuo Sakamoto; Maki Kitahara; Leon M T Dicks
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Isolation and characterization of fructophilic lactic acid bacteria from fructose-rich niches.

Authors:  Akihito Endo; Yuka Futagawa-Endo; Leon M T Dicks
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-05       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Genomic analysis reveals Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis as stable element in traditional sourdoughs.

Authors:  Rudi F Vogel; Melanie Pavlovic; Matthias A Ehrmann; Arnim Wiezer; Heiko Liesegang; Stefanie Offschanka; Sonja Voget; Angel Angelov; Georg Böcker; Wolfgang Liebl
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  ARDB--Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Mihai Pop
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Metabolism of Fructophilic Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from the Apis mellifera L. Bee Gut: Phenolic Acids as External Electron Acceptors.

Authors:  Pasquale Filannino; Raffaella Di Cagno; Rocco Addante; Erica Pontonio; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Safety of the surrogate microorganism Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 for use in thermal process validation.

Authors:  Lauren M Kopit; Eun Bae Kim; Roland J Siezen; Linda J Harris; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.