Literature DB >> 23405300

Complete Genome of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris UC509.9, Host for a Model Lactococcal P335 Bacteriophage.

Stuart Ainsworth1, Aldert Zomer, Victor de Jager, Francesca Bottacini, Sacha A F T van Hijum, Jennifer Mahony, Douwe van Sinderen.   

Abstract

Here, we report the complete genome of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris UC509.9, an Irish dairy starter. The circular chromosome of L. lactis UC509.9 represents the smallest among those of the sequenced lactococcal strains, while its large complement of eight plasmids appears to be a reflection of its adaptation to the dairy environment.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23405300      PMCID: PMC3569286          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00119-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactococcus lactis strains are used extensively worldwide for the production of fermented dairy products. Bacteriophage (phage) attack during this fermentation process can lead to slow or failed fermentations and is therefore of major economic concern (1). L. lactis subsp. cremoris UC509 is an Irish cheddar starter strain and is the lysogenic host of the model P335-type phage Tuc2009 (2–6). L. lactis UC509.9, whose genome sequence is presented here, is a prophage-cured Tuc2009-sensitive derivative of UC509 (7). While lactococcal phages are subject to intensive scientific scrutiny, the specific interactions with their hosts are poorly understood. To further our understanding regarding the molecular interplay between Tuc2009 and its host, we sequenced the genome of L. lactis UC509.9. Sequencing was performed by Agencourt Bioscience (Beverly, MA) and Macrogen (Seoul, Republic of Korea) using a combination of 454 sequencing of a 3-kb fragment library using Roche standard procedures and of Sanger sequencing of a 36-kb insert library followed by homopolymer tract correction using Illumina sequencing. Initial sequence assembly was performed using GSassembler (Roche). Gap closure and quality improvements were performed by Sanger sequencing of gap-closing PCR products as suggested by Projector 2 (8) with the Staden package (9). Homopolymer tract single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected and corrected using Robust Variant detection (ROVAR) (V. de Jager, B. Renckens, R. J. Siezen, and S. A. F. T. van Hijum, unpublished data [https://trac.nbic.nl/rovar/]) applied to Illumina sequencing data as described previously (10), resulting in a >200-fold coverage of the genome. Putative protein-encoding genes were identified using Prodigal version 2.0 (11). The results were inspected using Artemis (12), with manual checking and editing using BLASTP, Pfam (13), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (14), and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases (15). The complete genome of L. lactis UC509.9 consists of a single circular chromosome of 2,250,427 bp (35.88% G+C content) plus eight plasmids: pCIS1 (4,263 bp), pCIS2 (5,961 bp), pCIS3 (6,159 bp), pCIS4 (7,045 bp), pCIS5 (11,676 bp), pCIS6 (40,285 bp), pCIS7 (53,051 bp), and pCIS8 (80,592 bp). The L. lactis UC509.9 genome is predicted to contain 2,066 protein-encoding genes, of which 168 are pseudogenes. Forty-three of these 168 pseudogenes are identical to those found in L. lactis subsp. cremoris SK11 (GenBank accession no. CP000425.1). The genome of L. lactis UC509.9 contains 104 transposase-encoding genes involving a total of 106,746 bp, including 42 copies of IS182 and 29 copies of IS981. The combination of the smallest lactococcal chromosome identified so far and the high number of transposons and pseudogenes suggests that the genome has undergone significant genome decay while adapting to the nutrient-rich dairy environment. A region of approximately 11 kb in size not present in other L. lactis genomes appears to be an integrated plasmid that includes the restriction-modification system ScrFII (16). The L. lactis UC509.9 plasmid complement encodes various traits for adaptation to the dairy environment, such as lactose and casein metabolism.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The complete chromosome and plasmid complement of L. lactis subsp. cremoris UC509.9 were deposited in GenBank under accession no. CP003157 (chromosome), CP003165 (pCIS1), CP003164 (pCIS2), CP003163 (pCIS3), CP003162 (pCIS4), CP003161 (pCIS5), CP003160 (pCIS6), CP003159 (pCIS7), and CP003158 (pCIS8).
  15 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The Staden package, 1998.

Authors:  R Staden; K F Beal; J K Bonfield
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

3.  Anatomy of a lactococcal phage tail.

Authors:  Stephen Mc Grath; Horst Neve; Jos F M L Seegers; Robyn Eijlander; Christina S Vegge; Lone Brøndsted; Knut J Heller; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Finn K Vogensen; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A topological model of the baseplate of lactococcal phage Tuc2009.

Authors:  Giuliano Sciara; Stéphanie Blangy; Marina Siponen; Stephen Mc Grath; Douwe van Sinderen; Mariella Tegoni; Christian Cambillau; Valérie Campanacci
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Structure of the phage TP901-1 1.8 MDa baseplate suggests an alternative host adhesion mechanism.

Authors:  David Veesler; Silvia Spinelli; Jennifer Mahony; Julie Lichière; Stéphanie Blangy; Gérard Bricogne; Pierre Legrand; Miguel Ortiz-Lombardia; Valérie Campanacci; Douwe van Sinderen; Christian Cambillau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Complete resequencing and reannotation of the Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 genome.

Authors:  Roland J Siezen; Christof Francke; Bernadet Renckens; Jos Boekhorst; Michiel Wels; Michiel Kleerebezem; Sacha A F T van Hijum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Penny Coggill; Andreas Heger; Joanne E Pollington; O Luke Gavin; Prasad Gunasekaran; Goran Ceric; Kristoffer Forslund; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Molecular and transcriptional analysis of the temperate lactococcal bacteriophage Tuc2009.

Authors:  Jos F M L Seegers; Stephen Mc Grath; Mary O'Connell-Motherway; Elke K Arendt; Maarten van de Guchte; Martina Creaven; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Lactococcal 936-type phages and dairy fermentation problems: from detection to evolution and prevention.

Authors:  Jennifer Mahony; James Murphy; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.

Authors:  Roman L Tatusov; Natalie D Fedorova; John D Jackson; Aviva R Jacobs; Boris Kiryutin; Eugene V Koonin; Dmitri M Krylov; Raja Mazumder; Sergei L Mekhedov; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; B Sridhar Rao; Sergei Smirnov; Alexander V Sverdlov; Sona Vasudevan; Yuri I Wolf; Jodie J Yin; Darren A Natale
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  24 in total

1.  Unleashing Natural Competence in Lactococcus lactis by Induction of the Competence Regulator ComX.

Authors:  Joyce Mulder; Michiel Wels; Oscar P Kuipers; Michiel Kleerebezem; Peter A Bron
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Lactococcus lactis Diversity in Undefined Mixed Dairy Starter Cultures as Revealed by Comparative Genome Analyses and Targeted Amplicon Sequencing of epsD.

Authors:  Cyril A Frantzen; Hans Petter Kleppen; Helge Holo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The plasmid complement of Lactococcus lactis UC509.9 encodes multiple bacteriophage resistance systems.

Authors:  Stuart Ainsworth; Jennifer Mahony; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Lytic infection of Lactococcus lactis by bacteriophages Tuc2009 and c2 triggers alternative transcriptional host responses.

Authors:  Stuart Ainsworth; Aldert Zomer; Jennifer Mahony; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Plasmids from Food Lactic Acid Bacteria: Diversity, Similarity, and New Developments.

Authors:  Yanhua Cui; Tong Hu; Xiaojun Qu; Lanwei Zhang; Zhongqing Ding; Aijun Dong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Interaction between the genomes of Lactococcus lactis and phages of the P335 species.

Authors:  William J Kelly; Eric Altermann; Suzanne C Lambie; Sinead C Leahy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  AcmD, a homolog of the major autolysin AcmA of Lactococcus lactis, binds to the cell wall and contributes to cell separation and autolysis.

Authors:  Ganesh Ram R Visweswaran; Anton Steen; Kees Leenhouts; Monika Szeliga; Beata Ruban; Anne Hesseling-Meinders; Bauke W Dijkstra; Oscar P Kuipers; Jan Kok; Girbe Buist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genotype-phenotype matching analysis of 38 Lactococcus lactis strains using random forest methods.

Authors:  Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Marjo J C Starrenburg; Marijke R van der Sijde; Roland J Siezen; Sacha A F T van Hijum
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Complete Genome Sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis KLDS4.0325.

Authors:  Xiaochun Yang; Yutang Wang; Guicheng Huo
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2013-11-27

Review 10.  Current taxonomy of phages infecting lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Jennifer Mahony; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.