PURPOSE: A multi-cohort phase II study of fostamatinib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, was conducted to determine the response rate in patients with advanced colorectal (CRC), thyroid, non-small cell lung, head and neck, and renal cell carcinomas, and pheochromocytomas. METHODS: Patients received 200 mg fostamatinib BID in 4-week cycles with response assessed every 2 cycles. Blood was collected for pharmacokinetic analysis and measurements of circulating tumor cells and circulating endothelial (progenitor) cells (CE(P)Cs). RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (22 CRC), median of 4 prior therapies, were enrolled. Due to toxicities in four of the first five patients, the study was amended to incorporate a dose escalation phase for each histology. The maximum-tolerated dose was established at 50 mg BID in CRC but was not established for the other cancers. Common grade 3/4 toxicities included transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, and hypertension. Pharmacokinetic profile was similar to previous reports. Seventy-three percent of CRC patients had liver involvement and 91 % had prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Patients with abnormal liver tests at baseline were more likely to experience grade ≥ 2 hepatotoxicity than those with normal tests (44 vs. 0 %). No responses were observed; disease stabilization rate was 27 % in CRC. Reduction in CECs following treatment was associated with a better disease stabilization rate (75 vs. 0 %) in CRC. CONCLUSION: Fostamatinib had limited anti-tumor activity in this first clinical trial in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors; reduction in CECs and CEPs was indicative of anti-angiogenic effects. Abnormal liver testing at baseline appeared to influence drug tolerability.
PURPOSE: A multi-cohort phase II study of fostamatinib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, was conducted to determine the response rate in patients with advanced colorectal (CRC), thyroid, non-small cell lung, head and neck, and renal cell carcinomas, and pheochromocytomas. METHODS:Patients received 200 mg fostamatinibBID in 4-week cycles with response assessed every 2 cycles. Blood was collected for pharmacokinetic analysis and measurements of circulating tumor cells and circulating endothelial (progenitor) cells (CE(P)Cs). RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (22 CRC), median of 4 prior therapies, were enrolled. Due to toxicities in four of the first five patients, the study was amended to incorporate a dose escalation phase for each histology. The maximum-tolerated dose was established at 50 mg BID in CRC but was not established for the other cancers. Common grade 3/4 toxicities included transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, and hypertension. Pharmacokinetic profile was similar to previous reports. Seventy-three percent of CRC patients had liver involvement and 91 % had prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Patients with abnormal liver tests at baseline were more likely to experience grade ≥ 2 hepatotoxicity than those with normal tests (44 vs. 0 %). No responses were observed; disease stabilization rate was 27 % in CRC. Reduction in CECs following treatment was associated with a better disease stabilization rate (75 vs. 0 %) in CRC. CONCLUSION:Fostamatinib had limited anti-tumor activity in this first clinical trial in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors; reduction in CECs and CEPs was indicative of anti-angiogenic effects. Abnormal liver testing at baseline appeared to influence drug tolerability.
Authors: S Fruchon; S Kheirallah; T Al Saati; L Ysebaert; C Laurent; L Leseux; J J Fournié; G Laurent; C Bezombes Journal: Leukemia Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: George R Clemens; Raymond E Schroeder; Steven H Magness; Elizabeth V Weaver; Joseph W Lech; Vanessa C Taylor; Esteban S Masuda; Muhammad Baluom; Elliott B Grossbard Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2009-02
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Dan G Duda; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Yves Boucher; Marek Ancukiewicz; Dushyant V Sahani; Johanna Lahdenranta; Daniel C Chung; Alan J Fischman; Gregory Y Lauwers; Paul Shellito; Brian G Czito; Terence Z Wong; Erik Paulson; Martin Poleski; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Rex Bentley; Helen X Chen; Jeffrey W Clark; Rakesh K Jain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael E Weinblatt; Arthur Kavanaugh; Ruben Burgos-Vargas; Ara H Dikranian; Gabriel Medrano-Ramirez; Jorge L Morales-Torres; Frederick T Murphy; Theresa Kane Musser; Nicholas Straniero; Angela V Vicente-Gonzales; Elliott Grossbard Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-11
Authors: R Torrisi; V Bagnardi; A Cardillo; F Bertolini; E Scarano; L Orlando; P Mancuso; A Luini; A Calleri; G Viale; A Goldhirsch; M Colleoni Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Robert Kinders; Kate Ferry-Galow; Lihua Wang; Apurva K Srivastava; Jiuping Jay Ji; Ralph E Parchment Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jung-Min Lee; Jane B Trepel; Peter Choyke; Liang Cao; Tristan Sissung; Nicole Houston; Minshu Yu; William D Figg; Ismail Baris Turkbey; Seth M Steinberg; Min-Jung Lee; S Percy Ivy; Joyce F Liu; Ursula A Matulonis; Elise C Kohn Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Stuart W J Ember; Jin-Yi Zhu; Sanne H Olesen; Mathew P Martin; Andreas Becker; Norbert Berndt; Gunda I Georg; Ernst Schönbrunn Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Juhi Kumar; Dimple Chudasama; Charlotte Roberts; Mikael Kubista; Robert Sjöback; Jayanta Chatterjee; Vladimir Anikin; Emmanouil Karteris; Marcia Hall Journal: Cells Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 6.600